RE: [WSG] Re: Setting Up Font Sizes

2005-12-21 Thread Paul Noone
ehalf Of James O'NeillSent: Thursday, 22 December 2005 1:37 AMTo: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: Re: [WSG] Re: Setting Up Font Sizes 100.01% on body and then em's for the rest This prevents scaling issues with IE and older versions of Operahttp://www.freexenon.com/2005/10/css

Re: [WSG] Re: Setting Up Font Sizes

2005-12-21 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Laura Carlson wrote: body { font-size: small; } Such a rule is saying, in effect, "the content on this page should be one size smaller than the user's comfortable reading size." Small font sizes for main body text is user-hostile. (The converse rarely seems to exist; it's unusual to find a si

Re: [WSG] Re: Setting Up Font Sizes

2005-12-21 Thread James O'Neill
100.01% on body and then em's for the rest This prevents scaling issues with IE and older versions of Operahttp://www.freexenon.com/2005/10/css-fonts-and-font-sizing.html -- __"Bugs are, by definition, necessary. Just ask Microsoft!"www.co.sauk.wi.us (Work) www.a

[WSG] Re: Setting Up Font Sizes

2005-12-21 Thread Laura Carlson
body { font-size: small; } Such a rule is saying, in effect, "the content on this page should be one size smaller than the user's comfortable reading size." Small font sizes for main body text is user-hostile. (The converse rarely seems to exist; it's unusual to find a site that is too big, a