Re: [WSG] Re: SilverLight

2007-11-05 Thread Alastair Campbell
On 10/31/07, Scott Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let me know if i can help in anyway shape or form as It's not all that bad Sorry to pick up on this so late, but have you got any information on the next version from an accessibility point of view? Version 1 appears to be a non-starter from an

[WSG] Re: SilverLight

2007-10-30 Thread Scott Barnes
Hi, It warms my dear heart to see Silverlight talked about in a forum like this! :) I'll help if I may clear up a few things around Silverlight. * Silverlight SEO/Usability - At this point it's primitive, but we are working with folks from around the globe to firm this up some more,

RE: [WSG] Re: SilverLight

2007-10-30 Thread Scott Barnes
look better in HD Silverlight hehe). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Cruickshank Sent: Wednesday, 31 October 2007 2:56 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Re: SilverLight Hi Scott, There are some patent issues our

Re: [WSG] Re: SilverLight

2007-10-30 Thread Matthew Cruickshank
Hi Scott, There are some patent issues our legal folks are working through to ensure that it’s all smoothed out and what not, but this is a big step for Microsoft in this space and so we are learning as we go via the guidance of the Moonlight team (whom are awesome). Well Microsoft have