Designer wrote:
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Designer wrote:
Incidentally, I would be interested in any browsers you know which won't
support application/xhtml+xml, apart from IE of course.
http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/media-types/results
Thanks, Lachlan. I studied the list, and the onl
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Designer
wrote:
Incidentally, I would be interested in any
browsers you know which won't support application/xhtml+xml, apart from
IE of course.
http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/media-types/results
Thanks, Lachlan. I studied the list, and the
Designer wrote:
Incidentally, I would be interested in any browsers you know which won't
support application/xhtml+xml, apart from IE of course.
http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/media-types/results
--
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/
*
Jason Turnbull wrote:
Try changing the last style too DIV#container
Yup! Works fine now. Thanks (to both) for the clarification.
http://www.rhh.myzen.co.uk/rhh/gam/altgam/standards.php
Incidentally, I would be interested in any browsers you know which won't
support application/xhtml+xml
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> > No, it will not work under XHTML at all. The DOCTYPE is irrelevant,
> > XHTML is case sensitive and uppercase element selectors will not match
> > anything in XHTML. It will only work for text/html.
Designer wrote:
> OH Dear, I'm getting confused again!
>
> When I read t
Designer wrote:
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
No, it will not work under XHTML at all. The DOCTYPE is irrelevant,
XHTML is case sensitive and uppercase element selectors will not match
anything in XHTML. It will only work for text/html.
OH Dear, I'm getting confused again!
When I read the above, I t
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
No, it will not work under XHTML at all. The DOCTYPE is irrelevant,
XHTML is case sensitive and uppercase element selectors will not match
anything in XHTML. It will only work for text/html.
OH Dear, I'm getting confused again!
When I read the above, I thought "ah - her
