Re: [WSG] Safari Beta 4

2009-03-02 Thread tee
On Mar 1, 2009, at 3:57 AM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: Without that rule, empty thumbnail box is still clickable. Not quite so easy, it seems. Note that what you see as empty thumbnail boxes in Safari (without the extra CSS rule) aren't necessarily empty. Those images are just blown up so

Re: [WSG] Safari Beta 4

2009-03-02 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
tee wrote: By the way, Google Chorme behaves as Safari does. Not during my testing, but that may be conditional. Conditional is problematic since that mean behavior may change with factors like OS and connection speed = highly unreliable. Tested Chrome, OmniWeb and Arora - all complete

Re: [WSG] Safari Beta 4

2009-03-02 Thread Luke Hoggett
You tell 'em Dyre ;) Dyre Hult wrote: Opera 10 was unveiled already last year and do pass the web standards Acid 3 test. Safari 4 was unveiled this month. Both browsers are still in the dev stage, so I reckon Mr. Andrew Lyle was misinformed.

Re: [WSG] Safari Beta 4

2009-03-01 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
tee wrote: Thanks for checking. Adding the above rule makes the thumbnail unclickable when no thumbnail shows up. If I refresh the browser to make thumbnail shows up, then it's clickable. Yeah, the various Safari versions show very different behavior for the script. - Safari 3.2.x indeed

Re: [WSG] Safari Beta 4

2009-02-28 Thread tee
Hi, I have been struggling with a Safari cache bug that I found absolutely no solution. Before I trash the gallery script once more time I thought I might take a chance by posting my question in this thread, because the bug still not getting fixed in Safari Bete 4. On this site, in

Re: [WSG] Safari Beta 4

2009-02-28 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
tee wrote: On this site, in Safari (PC and Mac) you will see that the thumbnail(s) in the gallery (jquery galleria) is either not showing up or the image gets distorted (should be 80px). You may not see it from the first visit, should this be the case, please click on other page, then come back

Re: [WSG] Safari Beta 4

2009-02-28 Thread tee
On Feb 28, 2009, at 7:17 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: I can only test so far on a snapshot, but it looks like Safari 3.2.1 and Safari 4 beta1 behaves well when image-dimensions are styled on class gallery - not just galleria. Also seem to improve transition in Firefox 3, which otherwise

Re: [WSG] Safari Beta 4

2009-02-27 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
daniel wrote: it would be much more interesting to discuss IE8's compliance again. All compliant sites that I've made render fine in Safari 3 4 and FIrefox 3 but always fail to work 100% on IE... It isn't about standard compliance for your sites, but which standard IE8 is limited to - CSS

Re: [WSG] Safari Beta 4

2009-02-27 Thread Todd Budnikas
sorry to have passed along misinformation regarding which was the first browser to pass the Acid 3 Test. It still passes the test very very well, and is a decent benchmark to address the original question. On Feb 26, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Dyre Hult wrote: Opera 10 was unveiled already last

Re: [WSG] Safari Beta 4

2009-02-27 Thread kevin_erickson
Thank you Sent from my Centro Wireless Device. -Original Message- From: Todd Budnikas to...@missiondata.com Subj: Re: [WSG] Safari Beta 4 Date: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:23 pm Size: 4K To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org according to Mr. Andrew Lyle:Safari 4 is the first web browser to pass

RE: [WSG] Safari Beta 4

2009-02-27 Thread dave turner
dude! You not on a mac? See you next week! Dave Citect Turner From: Levell Rampono lev...@pro-perspective.com Sent: 26 February 2009 15:53 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] Safari Beta 4 Handling it very, very well and I'm running

RE: [WSG] Safari Beta 4

2009-02-27 Thread Levell Rampono
Handling it very, very well and I'm running on a PC! From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Todd Budnikas Sent: Thursday, 26 February 2009 3:07 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Safari Beta 4 according to Mr. Andrew Lyle: Safari 4

Re: [WSG] Safari Beta 4

2009-02-26 Thread Dyre Hult
Opera 10 was unveiled already last year and do pass the web standards Acid 3 test. Safari 4 was unveiled this month. Both browsers are still in the dev stage, so I reckon Mr. Andrew Lyle was misinformed. http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/presto-2-2-and-opera-10-a-first-look/ Todd Budnikas

Re: [WSG] Safari Beta 4

2009-02-26 Thread daniel
Well Webkit technically passed Acid 3 around the same time as Opera - late March '08 (28th) - but whilst Opera's Presto engine renders the final animation properly it doesn't render it smoothly, thus hasn't passed the test - so I reckon Mr Todd Budnikas was misinformed (: it's really just

[WSG] Safari Beta 4

2009-02-25 Thread Kevin Erickson
Hi, Anyone know about how the new Safari Beta 4 is handling the current standards of the Web? Thanks, Kevin No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.3/1969 - Release Date: 2/24/2009 6:43 AM

Re: [WSG] Safari Beta 4

2009-02-25 Thread Todd Budnikas
according to Mr. Andrew Lyle: Safari 4 is the first web browser to pass the web standards Acid 3 test which demonstrates how well a browser adheres to CSS, javascript, XML and SVG. So, i'd say it's handling them pretty well :) http://acid3.acidtests.org/ On Feb 25, 2009, at 10:39 PM,

Re: [WSG] Safari Beta 4

2009-02-25 Thread Al Sparber
From: Todd Budnikas to...@missiondata.com according to Mr. Andrew Lyle: Safari 4 is the first web browser to pass the web standards Acid 3 test which demonstrates how well a browser adheres to CSS, javascript, XML and SVG. So, i'd say it's handling them pretty well :)