The Bo$$ wrote:
If you can, you should try switching to a bigger resolution. It's much
better, and you'll wonder how you ever survived using 800x600.
My guess is that he tested it at 800x600 res, which makes perfect sense.
And 800x600 resolution can be useful for detail work in Photoshop or
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Wong Chin Shin
Sent: 03 January 2005 04:36
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Shedding Holiday Pounds
Tested on Firefox 1.0, Windows XP SP2.
1) Anti-war site heading is really close to the last line of the previous
paragraph. Looks more like a signature.
2
The site is major better. Looks good, Loads fast, gives choice for
movie, tells size... nice. I use windows, Firefox with an 800x600
resolution and there is a scroll bar across the bottom which I can
almost get rid of using the very small text. Positives happening :-)
I am liking the group,
If you can, you should try switching to a bigger resolution. It's much
better, and you'll wonder how you ever survived using 800x600.
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 18:49:45 -0500, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The site is major better. Looks good, Loads fast, gives choice for
movie, tells size...
I know, but it is amazing how many people browse at that still, and I
kinda like it... maybe I will lol
Bruce
The Bo$$ wrote:
If you can, you should try switching to a bigger resolution. It's much
better, and you'll wonder how you ever survived using 800x600.
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 18:49:45 -0500,
Hi,
Just relaunched for the new year, could someone look under the hood
for fatty tissue, bloat, redundancy the works. It all validates.
http://ckimedia.com
CK
__
Knowing is not enough, you must apply;
willing is not enough, you must do.
I am sure it is fine, I like the layout and background, I declined
having to install quicktime, perhaps that should be a viewers choice
afterwards? Rather than required before page loads...the first thing I
got was the popup to install it, which always irritates mealso I am
on a 56k modem,
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Chris Kennon
Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 7:11 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Shedding Holiday Pounds
Hi,
Just relaunched for the new year, could someone look under the hood
for fatty tissue, bloat
@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Shedding Holiday Pounds
Hi,
Just relaunched for the new year, could someone look under the hood
for fatty tissue, bloat, redundancy the works. It all validates.
http://ckimedia.com
CK
__
Knowing is not enough, you must apply;
willing
.
Can't really tell.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chris Kennon
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 9:11 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Shedding Holiday Pounds
Hi,
Just relaunched for the new year, could someone look under
I was starting to think I was in the wrong place, a tad ignored, after
all, I took the time to go there and gave my opinion, glad to see
someone at least agrees.
Not a negative, it is just many have a slow modem, and like I said
before, a lot will close a site before bothering to download
11 matches
Mail list logo
