differ from what I am using, besides replacing Strict with
Transitional.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Isac Backlund
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 6:44 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Tentative validation
Paul
: [WSG] Tentative validation
Paul skrev:
When I am validating I always seem to only tentatively
validate ( i.e
http://www.speakupnow.ca/wu/audiovideo.php ) , is there something I
can add to my code to make it fully validate?
Paul
Hi.
Try adding at content-type
meta http-equiv
@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Tentative validation
You have a mixed doctype, the declaration says strict but the uri points
to the transitional dtd.
P
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Paul
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 11:28 PM
So what is the pure transitional doctype:
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd; ?
Go to the source:
http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/04/valid-dtd-list.html
So you need to choose:
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML
Title: Message
When I am validating
I always seem to only tentatively validate ( i.e http://www.speakupnow.ca/wu/audiovideo.php)
, is there something I can add to my code to make it fully
validate?
Paul
Paul wrote:
When I am validating I always seem to only tentatively validate ( i.e
http://www.speakupnow.ca/wu/audiovideo.php ) , is there something I can
add to my code to make it fully validate?
Well, the validator actually tells you exactly what's wrong and how to
fix it...
Paul skrev:
When I am validating I always seem to only tentatively validate ( i.e
http://www.speakupnow.ca/wu/audiovideo.php ) , is there something I
can add to my code to make it fully validate?
Paul
Hi.
Try adding at content-type
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;