Nevermind, just looked it up
myself. Optional in HTML but xHTML.
--
Michael
Turnwall
for all
your web code needs
turnwall.net
Michael Turnwall wrote:
Can you site any
documentation that states theh opening HTML tag is optional?
--
Michael
Turnwall
for all
your web code needs
Can you site any
documentation that states theh opening HTML tag is optional?
--
Michael
Turnwall
for all
your web code needs
turnwall.net
David Dorward wrote:
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 10:02 -0400, Joseph Taylor wrote:
Well for starters you're missing your opening tag...
Thank you for your answers, I did indeed forget the beginning
tag, thank you for pointing it out. Since one the pages I have live
validated in W3C without the tag, it isn't my primary concern,
but will update with our next release.
It is interesting regarding the and W3C not doing
javascript.
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 10:02 -0400, Joseph Taylor wrote:
> Well for starters you're missing your opening tag...
... which is optional.
--
David Dorward
http://dorward.me.uk/
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/
Well for starters you're missing your opening tag...
Joseph R. B. Taylor
/Designer / Developer/
--
Sites by Joe, LLC
/"Clean, Simple and Elegant Web Design"/
Phone: (609) 335-3076
Fax: (866) 301-8045
Web: http://sitesbyjoe.com
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nancy
Nancy Johnson wrote:
> I just ran the following page through the W3C validator.
> http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/ewr/instances.cfm and the only thing it
> didn't like was the way I displayed the metatags. I got 4 errors.
> These are metatags that have been there long before I came and
> integrated th
I just ran the following page through the W3C validator.
http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/ewr/instances.cfm and the only thing it
didn't like was the way I displayed the metatags. I got 4 errors.
These are metatags that have been there long before I came and
integrated them into the new style sheet. I
