RE: [WSG] WSG thoghts on XUL

2005-02-22 Thread Patrick Lauke
> Dean Jackson > XUL is a much smaller technology than XAML. [...] > I doubt you'll be using the fact that both are XML to > transform between one and the other. Fair enough. I'll admit to not really knowing too much about XAML, hence my naive generalistation (or wishful thinking really). Thanks

Re: [WSG] WSG thoghts on XUL

2005-02-22 Thread Dean Jackson
On 22 Feb 2005, at 21:07, Patrick Lauke wrote: Dean Jackson [snip] I don't think it's beyond the scope of the W3C. We're constantly looking at technologies like XUL. Do people see the need for standardisation in this area? I'd welcome some standardisation, but as John Allsopp already mentioned, MS

Re: [WSG] WSG thoghts on XUL

2005-02-22 Thread Dean Jackson
John, On 22 Feb 2005, at 15:42, John Allsopp wrote: I don't think it's beyond the scope of the W3C. We're constantly looking at technologies like XUL. Do people see the need for standardisation in this area? Sure. I think the real benefit of standardisation and standards bodies is not necessarily

RE: [WSG] WSG thoghts on XUL

2005-02-22 Thread Patrick Lauke
> Dean Jackson [snip] > I don't think it's beyond the scope of the W3C. We're > constantly looking > at technologies like XUL. Do people see the need for standardisation > in this area? I'd welcome some standardisation, but as John Allsopp already mentioned, MS went the XAML route...so once again

Re: [WSG] WSG thoghts on XUL

2005-02-21 Thread John Allsopp
Dean, I don't think it's beyond the scope of the W3C. We're constantly looking at technologies like XUL. Do people see the need for standardisation in this area? Sure. I think the real benefit of standardisation and standards bodies is not necessarily the standards they develop (in a sense, it's

Re: [WSG] WSG thoghts on XUL

2005-02-21 Thread Dean Jackson
On 22 Feb 2005, at 11:34, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: Jixor - Stephen I wrote: I have previously encountered XUL but only just started to look into it. I have found it so far (only worked with it for one day) to be really interesting. I was wondering what other wsg members thought of it and maybe if

Re: [WSG] WSG thoghts on XUL

2005-02-21 Thread Jixor - Stephen I
Patrick H. Lauke wrote: Jixor - Stephen I wrote: I have previously encountered XUL but only just started to look into it. I have found it so far (only worked with it for one day) to be really interesting. I was wondering what other wsg members thought of it and maybe if they could give me some b

Re: [WSG] WSG thoghts on XUL

2005-02-21 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Jixor - Stephen I wrote: I have previously encountered XUL but only just started to look into it. I have found it so far (only worked with it for one day) to be really interesting. I was wondering what other wsg members thought of it and maybe if they could give me some background or forecast re

[WSG] WSG thoghts on XUL

2005-02-21 Thread Jixor - Stephen I
Hi, I have previously encountered XUL but only just started to look into it. I have found it so far (only worked with it for one day) to be really interesting. I was wondering what other wsg members thought of it and maybe if they could give me some background or forecast regarding the tech, wi