t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] XHTML1.1 differences
On 12/17/05, Lachlan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
designer wrote:
> Only 3 differences? I seem to remember more than a dozen . . . What are
> your 3?
There's 3 l
On 12/17/05, Lachlan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> designer wrote:
> > Only 3 differences? I seem to remember more than a dozen . . . What are
> > your 3?
>
> There's 3 listed in the XHTML 1.1 Appendix A [1]. However, there are
> other undocumented changes too.
That's what I was remembering.
designer wrote:
Are you serving the webpages as mime-type "application/xhtml+xml" ?
Because that is the only mime-type that should be used with XHTML 1.1.
It can also use application/xml or text/xml (although it's best to avoid
text/xml completely), or other appropriate XML MIME type.
Only 3
Christian Montoya wrote:
[snip ]
Are you serving the webpages as mime-type "application/xhtml+xml" ?
Because that is the only mime-type that should be used with XHTML 1.1.
Otherwise if you are going to use "text/html" then you should use
XHTML 1.0 Strict or H
