RE: [WSG] Back to basics!

2009-07-13 Thread Foskett, Mike
[mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Adam Smith Sent: 12 July 2009 23:41 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] Back to basics! Mike, It's messages like this one which make it such a joy to be part of WSG. Impeccable information and the perfect answer with just one URL! On 7/10

RE: [WSG] Back to basics!

2009-07-13 Thread Adam Smith
. Regards Mike From:li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Adam Smith Sent: 12 July 2009 23:41 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] Back to basics! Mike, It's messages like this one which make it such a joy to be part of WSG

Re: RE: [WSG] Back to basics!

2009-07-13 Thread greg
This is an automated message from g...@siworks.co.za. Good day, I will be attending a workshop on Monday 13th and Tuesday 14th and will not be in the office. I will try and get back to you via email in the evening, however if there is anything urgent please send me an SMS Thanks // Dankie //

Re: [WSG] Back to basics!

2009-07-12 Thread Andrew Cunningham
I just use a modified keyboard layout that allows me to directly type necessary punctuation directly form the keyboard. no messing around with entities or NCRs. Andrew designer wrote: Hi all, Could anyone tell me where there is information regarding character code 'usage' that is simple.

RE: [WSG] Back to basics!

2009-07-12 Thread Adam Smith
Message- From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of designer Sent: 10 July 2009 10:08 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Back to basics! Hi all, Could anyone tell me where there is information regarding character code 'usage' that is simple

Re: [WSG] Back to basics! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2009-07-12 Thread Andrew . Remely
[snip] Yes! Using UTF-8 in your web pages means NOT having to use HTML entities for text such as #241; or ecirc;. The only HTML entities you need to use in your character data are amp; for '' ampersand, lt; fo r '' less-than, and gt; for '' greater-than so that those characters don't

Re: [WSG] Back to basics!

2009-07-12 Thread Luke Hoggett
Hi all, I like http://leftlogic.com/lounge/articles/entity-lookup/ for any entities that I can't remember, and if you're on a Mac there's a widget, and a plugin for Firefox cheers Luke 2009/7/10 designer desig...@gwelanmor-internet.co.uk Hi all, Could anyone tell me where there is

Re: [WSG] Back to basics!

2009-07-11 Thread designer
Hi Paul, - Original Message - From: Paul Novitski p...@juniperwebcraft.com To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 6:23 PM Subject: RE: [WSG] Back to basics! [snip] Yes! Using UTF-8 in your web pages means NOT having to use HTML entities for text such as #241

Re: [WSG] Back to basics!

2009-07-11 Thread Paul Novitski
At 7/11/2009 04:44 AM, designer wrote: So you are really saying that typing I have got �100 to spare is OK, instead of: #8220;I have got pound;100 to spare#8221; Absolutely. As an example, look at the HTML source for this page: http://laurietobyedison.com/WOJwords_HanashiroIkuko.asp

Re: [WSG] Back to basics!

2009-07-11 Thread Rimantas Liubertas
So you are really saying that typing I have got £100 to spare is OK, instead of: #8220;I have got pound;100 to spare#8221; (just as an example, of course). Really? Yes, really. HTML as SGML application has so called document character set, which is UCS (Universal Character Set,ISO10646).

Re: [WSG] Back to basics!

2009-07-11 Thread tee
On Jul 11, 2009, at 7:37 AM, Paul Novitski wrote: At 7/11/2009 04:44 AM, designer wrote: So you are really saying that typing I have got £100 to spare is OK, instead of: #8220;I have got pound;100 to spare#8221; Absolutely. I have recently started building WordPress sites, found WP

[WSG] Back to basics!

2009-07-10 Thread designer
Hi all, Could anyone tell me where there is information regarding character code 'usage' that is simple. I always use UTF-8 and, e.g., if I want to put a left quote in my text I can use quot; or #8220; Which is recommended? Any help, links etc most welcome. (I have googled, but . . .)

Re: [WSG] Back to basics!

2009-07-10 Thread Алексей Тен
quot; and #8220; are not the same. quot; is #34; On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 13:08, designerdesig...@gwelanmor-internet.co.uk wrote: Hi all, Could anyone tell me where there is information regarding character code 'usage' that is simple.  I always use UTF-8 and, e.g., if I want to put a left

RE: [WSG] Back to basics!

2009-07-10 Thread Foskett, Mike
http://websemantics.co.uk/resources/common_symbols/ Mike -Original Message- From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of designer Sent: 10 July 2009 10:08 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Back to basics! Hi all, Could anyone tell me

RE: [WSG] Back to basics!

2009-07-10 Thread michael.brockington
-reference.html But there are plenty of others, though not many are as comprehensive as that one. Regards, Mike -Original Message- From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of designer Sent: 10 July 2009 10:08 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Back

Re: [WSG] Back to basics!

2009-07-10 Thread David Dorward
designer wrote: Hi all, Could anyone tell me where there is information regarding character code 'usage' that is simple. I always use UTF-8 and, e.g., if I want to put a left quote in my text I can use quot; or #8220; Which is recommended? Neither. quot; will give you a straight quote

RE: [WSG] Back to basics!

2009-07-10 Thread Paul Novitski
Could anyone tell me where there is information regarding character code 'usage' that is simple. I always use UTF-8 and, e.g., if I want to put a left quote in my text I can use quot; or #8220; Which is recommended? ... One of the main points of using Unicode is that you don't need to use

Re: [WSG] back to basics

2004-05-19 Thread Rev. Bob 'Bob' Crispen
The voices are telling me that [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on 5/18/2004 8:43 PM: So, yes, apos; is a better solution than the one I posted. Except that [censored] MSIE doesn't display the apostrophe. It gets it fine (as slapping ?xml version='1.0'? onto the top and renaming it to foo.xml

Re: [WSG] back to basics

2004-05-18 Thread Rev. Bob 'Bob' Crispen
The voices are telling me that James Ellis said on 5/18/2004 6:06 AM: I have a feeling apos; won't work in IE for Windows. I've used #039; everywhere with success. Right you are. You can tell how often I fire MSIE up on this box. Slap an XML header on it, rename it foo.xml, and MSIE renders it

RE: [WSG] back to basics

2004-05-18 Thread Mike Pepper
Of Rev. Bob 'Bob' Crispen Sent: 18 May 2004 23:13 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] back to basics The voices are telling me that James Ellis said on 5/18/2004 6:06 AM: I have a feeling apos; won't work in IE for Windows. I've used #039; everywhere with success. Right you are. You can tell

Re: [WSG] back to basics

2004-05-18 Thread wsg
Excuse me for possibly subtracting from the sum of human knowledge, but I don't recall reading in the original problem statement that it had to be a *semantic* single quote, which means the entity apos; would do just fine. My apologies, I presumed that Justin had already checked the existing

[WSG] back to basics

2004-05-17 Thread Justin French
Hi all, I feel incredibly inept for even asking this question, but I can't find a solution. I have an application that widely uses single quotes for tag attributes, which is perfectly valid XHTML, eg: input type='text' name='surname' value='French' / However, I can't find a way of escaping a

Re: [WSG] back to basics

2004-05-17 Thread James Ellis
Justin French wrote: My first reaction (after years of PHP scripting) was to escape it with a slash: input type='text' name='surname' value='O\'Riley' / -- doesn't work. Adding to this - try htmlspecialchars() in PHP with ENT_QUOTES set - this will special character all the XML reserved

Re: [WSG] back to basics

2004-05-17 Thread wsg
I can't find a way of escaping a single quote inside the attribute, The simple answer seems to be use double quotes for all attributes, so that at least the nested double quotes can be replaced with a quot; entity, but I can't believe this is my only option -- am I missing something??

Re: [WSG] back to basics

2004-05-17 Thread Rev. Bob 'Bob' Crispen
The voices are telling me that [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on 5/17/2004 8:26 PM: I can't find a way of escaping a single quote inside the attribute, ... b ) declare an entity in an inline DTD declaration at the top of the document to signify a single quote. eg: ?xml version=1.0? !DOCTYPE html [