[WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)

2005-11-08 Thread Jad Madi
Hi, any idea if it's possible to create menu like this one pure css without JS ? http://dojotoolkit.org/~alex/dojo/trunk/demos/widget/Fisheye.html if yes, please shot a kickstart -- Regards Jad madi Blog http://EasyHTTP.com/jad/ Web standards Planet http://W3planet.net/

Re: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)

2005-11-08 Thread Carolyn Diaz
The closest I've seen in css can be found at http://www.cssplay.co.uk/menus/expand.html. Good luck! CarolynOn 11/8/05, Jad Madi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,any idea if it's possible to create menu like this one pure css without JS

[WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)

2005-11-08 Thread Jad Madi
Hi, any idea if it's possible to create menu like this one pure css without JS ? http://dojotoolkit.org/~alex/dojo/trunk/demos/widget/Fisheye.html if yes, please shot a kickstart -- Regards Jad madi Blog http://EasyHTTP.com/jad/ Web standards Planet http://W3planet.net/

Re: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)

2005-11-08 Thread Wayne Douglas
That has about as much to do with AJAX as my mother does. Whats wrong with using the fisheye widget? Dojo code is standards compliant, effiecientJS. Why would you try to do something like that in _pure_ CSS? If your going to do that you might as well try to do it in plain text aswell. HTH w

Re: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)

2005-11-08 Thread Marko Mihelcic - founder of mcville.net (http.//www.mcville.net)|(http://board.mcville.net)
My point exactly why not use JS ? 2005/11/8, Wayne Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED]: That has about as much to do with AJAX as my mother does. Whats wrong with using the fisheye widget? Dojo code is standards compliant, effiecient JS. Why would you try to do something like that in _pure_ CSS? If

RE: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)

2005-11-08 Thread Paul Noone
AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax) Hi, any idea if it's possible to create menu like this one pure css without JS ? http://dojotoolkit.org/~alex/dojo/trunk/demos/widget/Fisheye.html if yes, please shot a kickstart -- Regards Jad madi Blog http://EasyHTTP.com

Re: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)

2005-11-08 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Paul Noone wrote: Using a PNG you could achieve a similar effect. Did you mean SVG? -- Patrick H. Lauke __ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk |

RE: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)

2005-11-08 Thread Paul Noone
Damn these infernal acronyms. ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick H. Lauke Sent: Wednesday, 9 November 2005 9:10 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax) Paul Noone wrote: Using a PNG you could

Re: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)

2005-11-08 Thread Samuel Richardson
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jad Madi Sent: Wednesday, 9 November 2005 6:17 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax) Hi, any idea if it's possible to create menu like this one pure css without JS ? http://dojotoolkit.org/~alex

Re: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)

2005-11-08 Thread Richard Czeiger
. R :o) - Original Message - From: Marko Mihelcic - founder of mcville.net (http.//www.mcville.net)|(http://board.mcville.net) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 6:40 AM Subject: Re: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax) My point exactly why