RE: [WSG] div width: 100% with a div width 800px inside should always be > 800px right?
This appears to work, thanks! Jeroen -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Tom Livingston Verzonden: donderdag 9 maart 2006 23:29 Aan: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Onderwerp: Re: [WSG] div width: 100% with a div width 800px inside should always be > 800px right? On 3/9/06 4:47 PM, "J Verburgh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to know if there's a way to make the wrapper-div, stop > shrinking when it gets down to the inner-div -- which has a fixed width of > 800px. Maybe this? http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/pie-calc.php HTH -- Tom Livingston Senior Multimedia Artist Media Logic www.mlinc.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] div width: 100% with a div width 800px inside should always be > 800px right?
On 3/9/06 4:47 PM, "J Verburgh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to know if there's a way to make the wrapper-div, stop > shrinking when it gets down to the inner-div -- which has a fixed width of > 800px. Maybe this? http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/sidepages/pie-calc.php HTH -- Tom Livingston Senior Multimedia Artist Media Logic www.mlinc.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
RE: [WSG] div width: 100% with a div width 800px inside should always be > 800px right?
Yes I can, but then it still wont work in IE... I would really like to get it working in IE, since that's the browser most people who will be visiting the site are using. I would like to know if there's a way to make the wrapper-div, stop shrinking when it gets down to the inner-div -- which has a fixed width of 800px. I could get it to work using tables, but I'm trying to stick to XHTML 1.0 Strict, so i prefer to use divs. In frontpage HTML, it might look something like this: This will fill the screen, but will always be atleast 800px wide -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Tom Livingston Verzonden: donderdag 9 maart 2006 22:02 Aan: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Onderwerp: Re: [WSG] div width: 100% with a div width 800px inside should always be > 800px right? On 3/9/06 3:20 PM, "Joseph R. B. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Go to Al's site (projectvii.com?) and he has a nice javascript that > checks for IE and handles the non-support of min-width by adding a width > declaration at run-time. Can't you just do a conditional comment for IE, giving the element a width declaration, leaving min-width in the main style for real... er... I mean other browsers? -- Tom Livingston Senior Multimedia Artist Media Logic www.mlinc.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
RE: [WSG] div width: 100% with a div width 800px inside should always be > 800px right?
Thanks, I'll take a look. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Joseph R. B. Taylor Verzonden: donderdag 9 maart 2006 21:20 Aan: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Onderwerp: Re: [WSG] div width: 100% with a div width 800px inside should always be > 800px right? Go to Al's site (projectvii.com?) and he has a nice javascript that checks for IE and handles the non-support of min-width by adding a width declaration at run-time. Works great. Joseph R. B. Taylor Sites by Joe, LLC http://sitesbyjoe.com (609)335-3076 [EMAIL PROTECTED] J Verburgh wrote: > Hi, I just encountered a problem with IE. I want to make this website look > like it's divided in a top and a bottom half. But i want it to be atleast > 800px wide. FireFox supports min-width, but IE doesn't support this. So, > everything works great until the browser's width is less than 800px. I want > the background to span the entire width of the screen. > > The setup is as follows: > > > > > > Menu items > > > Page body/content > > > > > > > > > Info body/content > > > > > It appears like the and are being clipped to > the width of the webbrowser, if it's < 800px. Is there a way around this? > > > Here's the website: > http://www.verburgh.homeip.net/jc/ > > Here's an example of what i mean: > http://www.verburgh.homeip.net/jc/example.jpg > > > Thanks for your help. > > Sincerely yours, > Jeroen > > ** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ** > > ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] div width: 100% with a div width 800px inside should always be > 800px right?
On 3/9/06 3:20 PM, "Joseph R. B. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Go to Al's site (projectvii.com?) and he has a nice javascript that > checks for IE and handles the non-support of min-width by adding a width > declaration at run-time. Can't you just do a conditional comment for IE, giving the element a width declaration, leaving min-width in the main style for real... er... I mean other browsers? -- Tom Livingston Senior Multimedia Artist Media Logic www.mlinc.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] div width: 100% with a div width 800px inside should always be > 800px right?
Go to Al's site (projectvii.com?) and he has a nice javascript that checks for IE and handles the non-support of min-width by adding a width declaration at run-time. Works great. Joseph R. B. Taylor Sites by Joe, LLC http://sitesbyjoe.com (609)335-3076 [EMAIL PROTECTED] J Verburgh wrote: Hi, I just encountered a problem with IE. I want to make this website look like it's divided in a top and a bottom half. But i want it to be atleast 800px wide. FireFox supports min-width, but IE doesn't support this. So, everything works great until the browser's width is less than 800px. I want the background to span the entire width of the screen. The setup is as follows: Menu items Page body/content Info body/content It appears like the and are being clipped to the width of the webbrowser, if it's < 800px. Is there a way around this? Here's the website: http://www.verburgh.homeip.net/jc/ Here's an example of what i mean: http://www.verburgh.homeip.net/jc/example.jpg Thanks for your help. Sincerely yours, Jeroen ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
[WSG] div width: 100% with a div width 800px inside should always be > 800px right?
Hi, I just encountered a problem with IE. I want to make this website look like it's divided in a top and a bottom half. But i want it to be atleast 800px wide. FireFox supports min-width, but IE doesn't support this. So, everything works great until the browser's width is less than 800px. I want the background to span the entire width of the screen. The setup is as follows: Menu items Page body/content Info body/content It appears like the and are being clipped to the width of the webbrowser, if it's < 800px. Is there a way around this? Here's the website: http://www.verburgh.homeip.net/jc/ Here's an example of what i mean: http://www.verburgh.homeip.net/jc/example.jpg Thanks for your help. Sincerely yours, Jeroen ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
