] font-familly: Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif
Mike Foskett's response to another thread referred to
http://www.websemantics.co.uk/tutorials/useful_css_snippets/#leveller
that applies the equivalent of the subject rule to body of a stylesheet
designed to get rid of most UA default styles.
I'm
Bitstream Vera Sans is nice, and free.
Anthony
--
www.fonant.com - hand-crafted web sites
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list
Marilyn Langfeld wrote:
I add Lucida (forget now if it's Grande or not) which I've heard is
prevalent on Unix machines.
I don't believe any Lucida proportional font is particularly common on
recent Linux distros. I suspect most Lucidas on Linux are either
ttf shares from Windows, serif,
Mike Foskett wrote:
What would you recommend as a Verdana equivalent / replacement font on a
Linux machine?
It has to be a prevalent font with similar readability.
At the outset, I recommend against ever specifying Verdana, for the
reasons expressed at
On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 21:27:15 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
I think simply specifying sans-serif or serif or nothing at all is the
ultimate solution. Specifying anything else essentially means visitors
never see their own preference. If you can't do that, and absolutely
must impose your choice, at
Mike Foskett's response to another thread referred to
http://www.websemantics.co.uk/tutorials/useful_css_snippets/#leveller
that applies the equivalent of the subject rule to body of a stylesheet
designed to get rid of most UA default styles.
I'm wondering how many people who use this rule have
