> Which menu are you referring to? I've tried Viev > Text Size > Largest,
> but nothing happened. If you need to account for the users base font
> size, you must use something other than px.
Tools> Internet Options> Accessibility> Ignore font sizes
Cheers
Mark
--
Mark Stant
Mark Stanton wrote:
Hey Taco
The general idea that we stick to in here is that % or ems are best.
This is to work around a "bug" in IE/WIN that prevents px based fonts being
resized easily. It is still possible to resize px fonts in IE but you have
to dig around in the menu rather than using ctrl
Hey Taco
In some browsers, yes. For example on a hand held the font size will
probably be quite a bit smaller than on a normal desktop.
But in terms of the common desktop browsers its ok, there are problems with
how %'s cascade in some cases but you can usually fix this up with a bit of
tweaking
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 10 December 2003 1:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] px em pt ???
Hey Taco
The general idea that we stick to in here is that % or ems are best.
This is to work around a "bug" in IE/WIN that prevents px based fonts being
resized easily. It is still p
Hey Taco
The general idea that we stick to in here is that % or ems are best.
This is to work around a "bug" in IE/WIN that prevents px based fonts being
resized easily. It is still possible to resize px fonts in IE but you have
to dig around in the menu rather than using ctrl+scrolly mouse.
Pe
http://www.maxdesign.com.au/presentation/relative/
> (aayyy, my third post today?)
>
> I'd like to see what all of yours opinion is on what to use for sizes, I have
> always been a believer to stick to pixels, because that is the only size that
> to me sounds as something that is not platform/O
Title: px em pt ???
(aayyy, my third post today?)
I'd like to see what all of yours opinion is on what to use for sizes, I have always been a believer to stick to pixels, because that is the only size that to me sounds as something that is not platform/OS bound.
Anyway, I also found the fo
