Re: [WSG] site check/comments please

2005-05-10 Thread designer
Hi Bert, you wrote: > I can only think of two reasons: > > 1. Accessibility > > Look at the page with styles disabled and > try to make sense of the links. Does it > still "work OK"? Yep! (well, I think so, anyway) > 2. Semantics > > By your own admission, it is "a list of >

Re: [WSG] site check/comments please

2005-05-10 Thread Bert Doorn
G'day Actually, it isn't an , that just applies to the title line. The list is simply that - a list of 's. I didn't see the point of making it any more complex than it needed to be, and it all seemed to work OK. But hey - I'm learning here, and asking for advice, so if there IS a good reason why i

Re: [WSG] site check/comments please

2005-05-09 Thread designer
o if there IS a good reason why it should be a please do tell. Thanks, Bob McClelland, Cornwall (U.K.) www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk - Original Message - From: "Mary Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 1:08 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] site check/comment

Re: [WSG] site check/comments please

2005-05-09 Thread Mary Wright
Bob, Nice site. All works well in IE Mac, FF, Camino and Safari. Should the list of Contributors be a instead of ? Mary On 9 May 2005, at 12:05, designer wrote: Good day, I am upgrading a site to standards etc and would be grateful for any feedback/suggestions etc, and confirmation from MAC folk t

[WSG] site check/comments please

2005-05-09 Thread designer
Good day, I am upgrading a site to standards etc and would be grateful for any feedback/suggestions etc, and confirmation from MAC folk that it works OK. It isn't quite finished (two of the contributor links don't work yet - I'm working my way through them) but most of it is in place. The site is