://www.w3.org/International/
Publication blog:
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Trick
Sent: 15 March 2005 19:20
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] style attribute depreciated
I just found you that the style attribute is depreciated in xhtml 1.1.
Does this mean that it will eventually be obolete? If so, what do they
expect us to do for inline styles because it doesn't always make sense
to have everything in an external style sheet.
Alan Trick
Alan Trick wrote:
I just found you that the style attribute is depreciated in xhtml
1.1. Does this mean that it will eventually be obolete? If so, what
do they expect us to do for inline styles because it doesn't always
make sense to have everything in an external style sheet.
Well, unless
Hi Alan,
I just found you that the style attribute is depreciated
in xhtml 1.1. Does this mean that it will eventually be
obolete?
It depends on what you mean by obolete. Deprecated means that it's part of
the spec but the construct is outdated and its use is strongly discouraged. The
next
I'm implementing some BBtag-like things on my webste though, and it
semes to make more sense to have something like [red] create a span
style='color:#f00'/span instead of a span class='red'/span and
have a whole bunch of unnecesary styles, and if I want to allow
something like [span
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:49:00 -, Alan Trick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm implementing some BBtag-like things on my webste though, and it
semes to make more sense to have something like [red] create a span
style='color:#f00'/span instead of a span class='red'/span and
have a whole bunch
Hi Alan,
Both span class=red and span style=color:#f00 are bad. How about
BBtags this:
[important]
[highlight]
[note]
[misc]
then you use this markup:
em class=important
em class=hightlight
..
Regards,
-Vlad
http://xstandard.com
Alan Trick wrote:
I'm implementing some BBtag-like things
