Peter Firminger schrieb:
Yes it's quite legal but it's semantically poor. This is what information
architecture is all about.
h1 global section (logo, slogan, navigation, search etc.)
h1 actual content section
h1 optional section one
h1 optional section two
That is the structure I would like to
James Ellis schrieb:
Hi
My thinking is that hN delineates headings of the same semantic weight
(or groups content), be they styled by CSS like h4
class=failure/h4 or h4 class=success/h4 or not*:
I agree.
The difference being that h1 is the highest level of the headings in a
document - there
We could probably argue this back and forward, but I feel very strongly that
there should be only one h1 on a page and it should be the page title. I
used to think it should be the site name but am moving away from that stance
now.
To use your example of 2 company founders - there would always
Tonico
A website is not book. It is different, it is not something you hold
in your hands,
This very true and sometimes people with print experience still need to
grasp it (sorry guys... you know who you are). However the reverse is
also true. Programmers think in terms of modules (sections)
On 19 Mar 2004, at 01:24, Jeremy Flint wrote:
I do believe that he said officially, not really speaking for
himself,
but for the CSS community that supported that method as a whole.
It was just a turn of phrase - using the language of specs and such
like (and yes he did say those exact words),
From: Jeremy Flint [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I do believe that he said officially, not really speaking
for himself,
but for the CSS community that supported that method as a
whole.
rant
Well...I'm part of the CSS community, and I was not consulted
on this...so how presumptuous of him to
Tantek's site is not really his own design. Every few weeks he changes the
visual appearance to look like one of the top 100 blogs - to show how their
sites could look the same but have sound underlying structure.
Can't remember who's visual style he has used at present...
Russ
Russ
I
Right now he's working on Doc Searls' Weblog -- doc.weblogs.com.
Tantek doesn't have a stylesheet switcher, but the older ones are
listed as alternate stylesheets, so if you're using Firefox or
something that lets you choose you can look at his previous recodes...
Nate
On Mar 18, 2004, at
On Wednesday, March 17, 2004, at 03:35 PM, russ weakley wrote:
While using multiple h1's are valid, you
should also think about the underlying page structure - and think
about how
other devices will interpret this structure.
Russ
Your point is well taken and needs to be implemented more.
At 07:35 18/03/2004 +1100, you wrote:
I've been thinking about a post from a few days ago that has been bothering
me. The comments in this post highlight the difference between valid
markup and structurally-sound markup:
Question:
...you have the headings of these as h1s I'm not sure if you should
At 07:35 18/03/2004 +1100, you wrote:
I've been thinking about a post from a few days ago that has been bothering
me. The comments in this post highlight the difference between valid
markup and structurally-sound markup:
Some more thoughts after a chat with a friend here:
- Web pages can
Sorry OT, but Jeremy is there anywhere I can find the keynotes to this
statement. This is pretty big news, we all knew about the problems
[http://www.alistapart.com/articles/fir/]but to officially deprecate!
So which one
[http://www.mezzoblue.com/archives/2003/12/12/accessible_i/index.php]
do
There are heaps of images-for-heading options described at this page that
get around the problems associated with FIR:
http://www.mezzoblue.com/tests/revised-image-replacement/
The FIR has been on the way out since Joe Clark wrote this:
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/fir/
The big issue is
13 matches
Mail list logo
