Re: [WSG] check website -- creareconkaterina
re: check website http://www.creareconkaterina.com/ A little late on replying, sorry. This is my personal Web style sheet... True Confessions -- (or how to suceed at Web design without driving yourself nuts): -start with a robust, stable, cross-browser reliable layout -let the content be first in the source order -do not throw a horizontal scroll bar at 800 -make believe IE does not exist -code for FF/Operera/Safari -let the user determine her font-size -never use an image when you can do without one -never use br / unless there is no alternative -validate css/markup (frequently) -check page at 800, 1024, 1280 (frequently) -check that layout does not break at 200% (frequently) -ask help of the list to get it to work in the 'evil one' FWIW, this http://www.dlaakso.com/sandbox/2c.html is not intended as an answer to any of the above, but rather as an example of a possible place to start? Good luck. ~dL -- David Laakso http://www.dlaakso.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] check website
A few suggestions: 1) The site could fit at 800x600, but the fixed margins make it too large. 2) Consider using text with background images for the menu and footer, instead of images of text. This would reduce file size and make the site useable by people who can't or won't view images. If that isn't an option, at least provide alt attributes for the images that contain text. 3) I'd recommend replacing multiple br / tags with margins or padding. 4) You have more than one element with the ID cent. Use classes instead, and your site will validate. 5) Use headings such as h1 and h2 instead of symantically empty elements such as div id=header ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] check website
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, please, check this website http://www.creareconkaterina.com Hi Daniele, You have more than *140kb* of images on this page... IMHO, you should try to reduce that... Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] check website
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : A few suggestions: 1) The site could fit at 800x600, but the fixed margins make it too large. 2) Consider using text with background images for the menu and footer, instead of images of text. This would reduce file size and make the site useable by people who can't or won't view images. If that isn't an option, at least provide alt attributes for the images that contain text. 3) I'd recommend replacing multiple br / tags with margins or padding. 4) You have more than one element with the ID cent. Use classes instead, and your site will validate. 5) Use headings such as h1 and h2 instead of symantically empty elements such as div id=header Thanks a lot :)) ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Check website
thanks :))) Daniel - Original Message - From: David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 8:24 AM Subject: Re: [WSG] Check website On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 07:18:44 +0100, Gizax Studios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Check this website for a marketing company. Some section are coming soon. http://www.arcapplied.org/tempodaniele/index.php regards Daniel http://www.gizax.it Daniel, I like the color and general feel ot the site but find the nav menu and content text too small. The banner logo is not happy with it's position at 800, nor at higher screen resolutions with a sidebar in place, sliding under the outer container. Alternate text for that image might be a good idea. A couple of errors on the CSS file, including the inclusion of MS proprietary stuff, keeps it from validating. Page shift happening when going to and from pages not long enough to draw a scroll bar.The comment form is breaking right on zoom. Regards, David -- de gustibus non est disputandum http://www.dlaakso.com/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] Check website
Nice and clean looking site. A couple of issues I have noticed: You may have designed on a high resolution, but at 800x600 (still a common res) the logo disappears behind the content. I think that the white line around the top nav looks a little out of place. Cheers James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gizax Studios Sent: Monday, 21 February 2005 5:19 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Check website Hi all, Check this website for a marketing company. Some section are coming soon. http://www.arcapplied.org/tempodaniele/index.php regards Daniel http://www.gizax.it ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Check website
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 07:18:44 +0100, Gizax Studios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Check this website for a marketing company. Some section are coming soon. http://www.arcapplied.org/tempodaniele/index.php regards Daniel http://www.gizax.it Daniel, I like the color and general feel ot the site but find the nav menu and content text too small. The banner logo is not happy with it's position at 800, nor at higher screen resolutions with a sidebar in place, sliding under the outer container. Alternate text for that image might be a good idea. A couple of errors on the CSS file, including the inclusion of MS proprietary stuff, keeps it from validating. Page shift happening when going to and from pages not long enough to draw a scroll bar.The comment form is breaking right on zoom. Regards, David -- de gustibus non est disputandum http://www.dlaakso.com/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
