-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: 25/02/2004 7:22:53 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [WSG] DTDS and which to use?
On 25 Feb 2004, at 10:40, JW wrote:
> Ooo I see! Thanks Andy / Martin!
>
> Hmm any ideas in tweaking Dreamweaver to work with standards?
>
Which version? I
From: JW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 26 February 2004 3:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] DTDS and which to use?
Thank you very much Manuel. Now everything validates and converted all pages
on my site except for the favourite links as I have the
ssistance! Once again thanks all!!!
With Regards,
Jaime Wong
~~~
SODesires Design Team
http://www.sodesires.com
~~~
---Original Message---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 25/02/2004 11:51:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] DTDS and which to use?
El mié, 25-02-2004 a las 15:02, JW escribió:
>
> Line 89, column 11: there is no attribute "name" (explain...).
>form_service/dodosmail.p
Yes, in Strict there's no "name" attribute for the element, use
"id" instead. Note that "name" *IS NOT* deprecated for form elements
such as , just for
ement "input" here; missing one of "p", "h1", "h2", "h3", "h4", "h5", "h6", "div", "pre", "address", "fieldset", "ins", "del" start-tag
Webworks
http://afpwebworks.com
From: JW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 25 February 2004
10:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] DTDS and which
to use?
Using MX
04. Actually really want to tweak it the way it generates the html codes.
Like if I
Jaime Wong
~~~
SODesires Design Team
http://www.sodesires.com
~~~
---Original Message---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 25/02/2004 7:22:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] DTDS and which to use?
On 25 Feb 2004, at 10:40, JW wrote:
> O
se the majority
:)
With Regards,
Jaime Wong
~~~
SODesires Design Team
http://www.sodesires.com
~~~
---Original Message---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 25/02/2004 5:53:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] DTDS and which to use?
On 25 Feb 200
JW wrote:
As for open target in new window, if I want a new window, how can I achieve
it with strict?
Hi
This started a long thread before, so rather than start it again you
should probably check the WSG vault as there are some interesting &
valid opinions on this ranging subject from JS to
El mié, 25-02-2004 a las 11:40, JW escribió:
> Ooo I see! Thanks Andy / Martin!
>
> Hmm any ideas in tweaking Dreamweaver to work with standards?
>
> As for open target in new window, if I want a new window, how can I achieve
> it with strict?
>
>
When switching DOCTYPEs isn't an option,
~~~
SODesires Design Team
http://www.sodesires.com
~~~
---Original Message---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 25/02/2004 5:53:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] DTDS and which to use?
On 25 Feb 2004, at 09:12, JW wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have copi
Hi Jaime
On 25 Feb 2004, at 09:12, JW wrote:
Hi all
I have copied a page from my website and make the DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict
just to see the diff btwn transitional and strict. You can see it here
http://www.sodesires.com/about/strict.html
Well the xhtml validation shows error but even after
On 25 Feb 2004, at 09:12, JW wrote:
Hi all
I have copied a page from my website and make the DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict
just to see the diff btwn transitional and strict. You can see it here
http://www.sodesires.com/about/strict.html
Well the xhtml validation shows error but even after reading
Hi all
I have copied a page from my website and make the DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict just to see the diff btwn transitional and strict. You can see it here http://www.sodesires.com/about/strict.html
Well the xhtml validation shows error but even after reading the explanation of errors, I still
~~~
---Original Message---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 25/02/2004 8:12:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] DTDS and which to use?
Hi Jaime,
Slightly off the discussion but I can't help thinking that if I was you
in that chain of command...
C
Hi Jaime,
Slightly off the discussion but I can't help thinking that if I was you
in that chain of command...
Client <--- Design Firm <--- Subcontracted Freelancer <--
Sub-subcontracted You
...I'd be very wary of work that has supposedly "strict" guidelines to
follow yet the flow of project i
esign Team
http://www.sodesires.com
~~~
---Original Message---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 02/25/04 02:59:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] DTDS and which to use?
I've found for new sites without a lot of forms or pre-existing content,
building to XHTML1.0 St
]
Subject: RE: [WSG] DTDS and which to use?
I've found for new sites without a lot of forms or pre-existing content,
building to XHTML1.0 Strict makes sure I have a disciplined, well structured
site that quite easily validates and styles with CSS. I have to keep
applying discipline to rid myse
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 02/25/04 02:30:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] DTDS and which to use?
Hi Jaime, you may also find this article of some use.
Addy: http://leavesrustle.com/articles/124/
Good luck.
Regards, JG
> I have always work with XHTML 1.0 Transitional and neve
I've found for new sites without a lot of forms or pre-existing content,
building to XHTML1.0 Strict makes sure I have a disciplined, well structured
site that quite easily validates and styles with CSS. I have to keep
applying discipline to rid myself of old sloppy coding habits. Validating
to
Team
http://www.sodesires.com
~~~
---Original Message---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 02/24/04 23:11:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] DTDS and which to use?
Hi Jaime, the W3Schools is a useful page. You can learn more about the
diferences using this link
Hi Jaime, you may also find this article of some use.
Addy: http://leavesrustle.com/articles/124/
Good luck.
Regards, JG
> I have always work with XHTML 1.0 Transitional and never really bothered
> with Strict until I yesterday when someone sub a project to me saying that
> the client wanted the
Jaime, this is not a CSS list so no apology required. You are definitely
on-topic.
Unless you want to tell your client to "go all the way" I suggest you tell
them that they are clutching for buzzwords by demanding XHTML 1.0 Strict (or
anything beyond XHTML 1.0 Transitional). If they continue to de
Hi Jaime, the W3Schools is a useful page. You can learn more about the
diferences using this link:
http://www.w3schools.com/xhtml/xhtml_dtd.asp
Regards,
Gean
> I have always work with XHTML 1.0 Transitional and never really bothered
> with Strict until I yesterday when someone sub a project t
24 matches
Mail list logo