Essential, Todd and Dwain -
Thank you all for your input. Have removed the javascript language attributes as well as the errant html comment and now the Tidy message I get matches Strict/Strict Thanks again to everyone! Cole _____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Essential eBiz Solutions Ltd Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 8:11 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] DocType Given is... Document Looks Like... As far as I'm aware XHTML strict was never programmed to acknowledge attributes, this was something that was only available in the transitional format. If you remove language="javascript1.2" then you're page will validate perfectly. _____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cole Kuryakin Sent: 05 September 2008 00:40 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] DocType Given is... Document Looks Like... Hi Todd - Link is here: http://www.koisis.com/.framework/-public/index.php Yes, I have verified that it's HTML validator - which is based upon Tidy - extension that is giving me this info (it's not an error or even a warning). As mentioned, all my pages do validate (as per HTML Validator) as I always get a green check mark and "0 errors / 0 warnings" at the bottom-right-hand corner of FF. As mentioned, no where near an emergency or a problem, but I am just curious. Cole _____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Budnikas Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 7:08 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] DocType Given is... Document Looks Like... Cole, can you post a url so people can see the validator results and review the code? Everything looks on the up-and-up from what you've posted. I've never used the FF HTML Validator extension (is it the one based on HTML Tidy?), so i can't speak for that. The Web Developer extension just pushes the page to the W3C validator. Please also verify which Validator of the 2 you're running into trouble with. On Sep 4, 2008, at 12:47 AM, Cole Kuryakin wrote: Hello all - I've got the following doctype at the head of each of my pages: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en"> I take great pains to validate everything I do on every page, but, even if the page shows as valid (using FF's HTML Validator extension - or Web Developer extension. I can't remember which) when I view source on a "valid" page, I always get an info box that states: Info: Doctype given is "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" Info: Document content looks like XHTML 1.0 Transitional I don't think that this is - by any means - any reason for me to be worried about my code/structure/et. al, but I've always wondered why, if I feed a xhtml 1.0 STRICT doc type why the validator always says that my stuff looks TRANSITIONAL? Am I doing something wrong? Any insight would be appreciated. Cole ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ******************************************************************* ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ******************************************************************* ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ******************************************************************* ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ******************************************************************* ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
