On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 16:33:27 -0500, berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, but I already found this link. What I was looking for was theory.
I'd heartily recommend the O'Reilly JavaScript: The Definitive
Reference by David Flanagan -- it has a good section on HTML4 events
as well as DOM (Gecko)
Hi Berry,
Not really much out there on theory, but Gecko has a pretty compliant
DOM implementation.
The Gecko DOM Reference:
http://www.mozilla.org/docs/dom/domref/
The Mozilla Object Reference:
http://mozref.com/
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 16:33:27 -0500, berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, but I
From: berry
I would like to know if I can insert image into list ?
I have used this method by the past but in an article I read
that it was
not standard?
w3 say nothing about that ?
The best way to find out if it's standard as per W3C is to run
it through the validator
I have tried it, and it isn't standard. Try p-ing it instead.
berry wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if I can insert image into list ?
I have used this method by the past but in an article I read that it was
not standard?
w3 say nothing about that ?
And you what do you think?
Thanks in advance
Indranil Dasgupta wrote:
I have tried it, and it isn't standard. Try p-ing it instead.
Sorry, but...how did you try it? How did you arrive at the conclusion
that it isn't standard? It's perfectly valid (even up to XHTML 1.1)!
ul
liimg src=... alt=a good alt text //li
/ul
--
Patrick H. Lauke
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
It's perfectly valid (even up to XHTML 1.1)!
If you use of object instead of img, it's valid even in XHTML2.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Well, I used it in my site, and it gave errors. Maybe I'm wrong!
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Indranil Dasgupta wrote:
I have tried it, and it isn't standard. Try p-ing it instead.
Sorry, but...how did you try it? How did you arrive at the conclusion
that it isn't standard? It's perfectly valid (even
My mistake. :-[ Sorry.
Indranil Dasgupta wrote:
Well, I used it in my site, and it gave errors. Maybe I'm wrong!
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Indranil Dasgupta wrote:
I have tried it, and it isn't standard. Try p-ing it instead.
Sorry, but...how did you try it? How did you arrive at the conclusion
http://www.hwg.org/resources/faqs/ratesFAQ.html
perhaps this will be useful, maybe not.
But the discussion has been found inappropriate for the list. I apologize for
continuing it, but just wanted to share a link I had on the topic.
ByteDreams
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What you charge depends on a whole range of factors but these are the
main ones.
- The local going rate
- The type of clients you deal with
- How good you are at what you do
- Your overheads
Obviously a large agency with flash premises in the Middle of London
dealing with blue chip clients are
Call me overly cautious, but I don't think this is
a topic for discussion...
http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3Acollusion
Patrick H. Lauke
__re·dux
(adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively. [latin : re-,
While in some countries it imay be considered illegal to even discuss
prices for services, unless laws have changed in the last few years it
is not illegal in Australia or the EU. Actual price fixing may be, but
professionals discussing how to work out what to charge and what to
charge for is
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Call me overly cautious, but I don't think this is a topic for
discussion...
http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3Acollusion
You're overly cautious. There's a huge difference between discussing
what goes into setting a price or expressing opinion on what is a valid
This discussion may be OK or not in certain countries, but it doesn't
have much to with web standards.
Let's close the thread now please. Guys, feel free to discuss it with
each other offlist or in another appropriate forum.
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Call me overly cautious, but I don't think
I didn't think there would be a problem discussing this issue...
I was actually quite interested in seeing how you all charge your
clients and on what basis.
Sometimes I charge a flat fee - kind of a contract.
Say - $3000 and I set it all up from start to finish.
But two days ago I scored my
On 7/21/04 3:42 PM Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this
out:
Call me overly cautious, but I don't think this is a topic for discussion...
http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3Acollusion
I agree, FWIW.
Rick
*
The discussion list
Taco,
The company that I work for at the moment cannot afford to say 'bye bye' to 5% of web
users (let alone 2%) for the simple fact that 5% represents THOUSANDS of customers all
wanting to pay us money to provide them with web services.
BTW, You were 'web designing' in 1991...?
Taco-
I think it's more of a complex situation than that. I'm sort of sick of
all the browser hoopla as well, and I've only been into designing for 5
years. Back when I was a consumer in the browser wars, that was a good
time as well - fun to kick back and watch the dust fly :)
I doubt there
I'm not sure why the browser wars were so damn
violent
Two words
Market Share
The big companies realised, once the Internet started becoming popular
outside of Universities and large organisations, that the Browser was the
perfect conduit into people's homes (far moreso even than
19 matches
Mail list logo
