Re: [WSG] New Yorker Redesign
Does this site use some kind of image replacement/substitution technique for the headers? *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
RE: [WSG] New Yorker Redesign
I believe siFr lists them as one of their users... It's a technique to replace headers by swf text using javascript. It's quite cool if used under certain strict conditions. http://www.mikeindustries.com/sifr/ Cheers, Angela -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de kevin mcmonagle Envoyé : mercredi 28 mars 2007 14:04 À : wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Objet : Re: [WSG] New Yorker Redesign Does this site use some kind of image replacement/substitution technique for the headers? *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
RE: [WSG] New Yorker Redesign
misc:exposeBean var=platform bean=platform/ Never a good look to expose your beans in public... Apart from that it seems to be just url encoding issues - great to see more and more large sites moving to standards based code Paul *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] New Yorker Redesign
Nice site. Looks like 1204x768 is becoming the new 800x600, but it's something that is probably ahead of its time. Especially since two members of my immediate family intentionally use the smaller resolution because it's easier to see. Still, though, adoption of standards is a positive direction. Mike Cherim http://green-beast.com - Original Message - From: John Horner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 6:58 PM Subject: [WSG] New Yorker Redesign Speaking of redesigns, http://www.newyorker.com/ is looking very nice these days. Not a table in sight. It doesn't quite validate due to some (presumably back-end-error) weirdness: misc:exposeBean var=platform bean=platform/ but other than that it looks like a good standards-based website. == The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and may contain legally privileged or copyright material. It is intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are not permitted to disseminate, distribute or copy this email or any attachments. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your system. The ABC does not represent or warrant that this transmission is secure or virus free. Before opening any attachment you should check for viruses. The ABC's liability is limited to resupplying any email and attachments == *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] New Yorker Redesign
John Horner wrote: Speaking of redesigns, http://www.newyorker.com/ is looking very nice these days. Not a table in sight. but other than that it looks like a good standards-based website. Yes, well, sort of...still the need (for me) to go through the drill of ignoring their font-sizes in IE. Best, ~dL -- http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] New Yorker Redesign
Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote: Nice site. Looks like 1204x768 is becoming the new 800x600, but it's something that is probably ahead of its time. Especially since two members I work at a newspaper... we are heading that direction for our next site design iteration Content area will fall-in to the 800 wide range, but overall template size hit 1024. Most of the big dogs (NYT, IHT, Seattle times...) are going for the wider format. :) -- Wishlists: http://snipurl.com/vrs9 Switch: http://browsehappy.com/ BCC?: http://snipurl.com/w6f8 My: http://del.icio.us/mhulse *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] New Yorker Redesign
Yeah the new web design at my australian government place is also currently involved in a redesign and it is made for a 1024 screen (funny seeing the web managers still use 800) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 28/03/2007 10:43 am Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote: Nice site. Looks like 1204x768 is becoming the new 800x600, but it's something that is probably ahead of its time. Especially since two members I work at a newspaper... we are heading that direction for our next site design iteration Content area will fall-in to the 800 wide range, but overall template size hit 1024. Most of the big dogs (NYT, IHT, Seattle times...) are going for the wider format. :) -- Wishlists: http://snipurl.com/vrs9 Switch: http://browsehappy.com/ BCC?: http://snipurl.com/w6f8 My: http://del.icio.us/mhulse *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** ** The above message has been scanned and meets the Insurance Commission of Western Australia's Email security requirements for inbound transmission. ** The above message has been scanned and meets the Insurance Commission of Western Australia's Email security policy requirements for outbound transmission. This email (facsimile) and any attachments may be confidential and privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this email (facsimile) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email (facsimile) in error please contact the Insurance Commission. Web: www.icwa.wa.gov.au Phone: +61 08 9264 * *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
