Henrik,
Thank you for your feed back. I am working on those now. =)
The little globe is used to indicate links to external sites. Perhaps
another icon would indicate this better?
What would you suggest for the link colors. I prefer colors that make the
links stand our and not blend into the rest
External link icon: I'd lose the globe, also because it's jaggy. You
may find this useful:
http://programmabilities.com/xml/?id=30
Link colour: The site is very blue. Maybe choose one or two
complementary or contrasting colours, for decoration, and use a
derivative for your link
Hi Jim,
A couple of cents from downunder (in FF3, Camino, Safari / Mac).
1) The main horizontal menu bar breaks thru the blue border on the
right
2) Maybe the drop menu would look better with a matching background
image on the main category, rather than a solid blue block
3) I'd
Just a quick thank you to everyone who replied, it's been a *huge*
help. I'm carefully going over the site with your comments in mind
and making many changes based upon them.
I'm still very busy, but as soon as things slow down I'll try to
respond in detail - meanwhile I'll just say that
On 2008/02/27 18:39 (GMT+1100) John Hancock apparently typed:
Here's a screenshot of a typical moderately high resolution
environment:
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/SC/sc-alaclib1.jpg
and the setup source:
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/tmp/sc-alaclib1.html
Just a thought, but a moderately high
On 2008/02/25 10:31 (GMT-0500) Andrew Maben apparently typed:
I'm almost done with a site redesign, and the time is right to ask
for your opinions: http://beta.www.aclib.us
for comparison, the current site is: http://www.aclib.us
...
Of course accessibility is important, and this is where
Hi Felix,
Here's a screenshot of a typical moderately high resolution
environment:
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/SC/sc-alaclib1.jpg
and the setup source:
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/tmp/sc-alaclib1.html
Just a thought, but a moderately high resolution environment to me is
a setup of over
Hi Andrew,
The site looks nice. I put the address into W3C Validator and its passed the
4.01 Transitional but has 23 warnings..strange..
Maybe the other members can explain, anyway its anice site and looks fine in
FF. I am on the following:
Win XP
1680x1050
SP2
IE
Kate
Bichon Frise:
On 2/25/08, Andrew Maben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course accessibility is important, and this is where your insights and
criticisms can be especially helpful.
here's a tool to check web site accessibility:
http://www.tawdis.net/taw3/cms/en
it suggests guidelines.
dwain
--
dwain alford
I'm almost done with a site redesign, and the time is right to ask
for your opinions: http://beta.www.aclib.ushttp://beta.www.aclib.us
for comparison, the current site is: http://www.aclib.ushttp://www.aclib.us
I'm aiming for HTML 4.01 Strict compliance, and am periodically
running the W3C
No big layout issues at all but on a quick perusal there are few things
I've noticed:
The stripey background - close thin stripes get flickery and a bit
distracting when the page is scrolled
IE:
- the search area needs some cross-browser attention. font-sizes,
input widths and the submit
On Feb 25, 2008, at 10:47 AM, Robert O'Rourke wrote:
No big layout issues at all but on a quick perusal there are few
things I've noticed:
The stripey background - close thin stripes get flickery and a bit
distracting when the page is scrolled
Same here. I find the background
It looks good, but I'd agree with Tee, it needs some spacing.
Interesting use of DLs, but I would not use display:none to hide the DT
(shoot them off-screen).
Also, I'd get rid of the DIV wrappers you have around these DLs. I think you
could remove a few other DIVs from the markup.
If the large
Nice job on that one. I only thing I could find wrong was the use of
javascript: pseudo links.
*Joseph R. B. Taylor*
Sites by Joe, LLC
/Custom Web Design Development/
Phone: (609) 335-3076
www.sitesbyjoe.com http://www.sitesbyjoe.com
Snadden Tim wrote:
www.richardson.co.nz
In
www.richardson.co.nz
In Firefox 2/Opera on Windows the lightbox images show 'null' as the
caption.
All the best.
This email with any attachments is confidential and may be subject to legal
privilege.
If it is not intended for you please reply immediately, destroy it and do not
copy,
Looks good. Only comment I'd make is about your skills and their ratings:
at the moment that information is only really of value to people already
in the web dev game and not really useful to anyone who doesn't know
anything about web development but who wants a website done. If you're not
Samuel Richardson wrote:
G'day all,
I've decided to make the jump from full time web development to
freelance work. Mostly front end development, (X)HTML/CSS/JavaScript
development etc.
Anyway, to support myself, I've created a portfolio here:
www.richardson.co.nz
I just want to make sure I
risk of going OT but I would like to ask you why did you choose a one page
info page with anchor links going down to the content???
I thought multi pages would be the way to go
apart from this I do not really have any problems with it, the menu is a bit
small though
Thanks and sorry
On
Hi Sam,
It looks great but there are lots of grammar errors. I also noticed that
in your CV you seem to be missing employment details on your current
position?
When I scrolled down to where you have rated your skills there is a
scrollbar thing happening that looks ugly and obscures some of
Cool, thanks for the comments. It sounds like I still have a few cross
browser issues to work out, lucky I just bought a Mac :D
The portfolio is strictly for design agencies to get an idea of what I
can do rather then the public. I went with a one page design to get
the content across quickly, I
Hi Samuel:
Good work dude ;)
The site looks neat, cool and usable.
Still I have a couple of suggestions:
1) To make the headings bigger
2) Maybe provide with a simple form to get in touch with you
3) N i think copy needs to be reviewed
otherwise looks awesome, have a look at mine to !
Best
neways good work dude, as somebody said, just the grammer etc needs to be
reviewed.
Best -P
- Original Message -
From: Samuel Richardson
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Mon, 28 May 2007 14:04:08 +1000
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site Review (www.richardson.co.nz)
Cool, thanks for the comments
Darren,
on Monday, January 30, 2006 at 12:26 wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wrote:
http://ta.rt-ms.net/2/properties.html
http://ta.rt-ms.net/2/propertydetails.html
You've got some problems in your HTML:
1. with/height attributes of img tags don't accept units.
2. the inputs need name attributes
Title: Re: [WSG] Site Review
No title?
Using Team makes no sense to me but maybe because its early. Join Team screams for a The in middle.
Find property is above the header. I can understand accessibility options being above but Find Property?
Maybe list the items (each sale block)
Check
Hi Darren,
The markup look pretty slick! My only comment would
be around your use of the strong element. For example:
pProperty strong3/strong of
strong500/strong found/p
Have you ever heard a screen reader when it hits
strong elements? For this reason I suggest just using a span and
Thanks Nathan,I have removed the strong elements and replaced them with a class for the price, I will have a think regarding the H3 as the context is already set and their is no other monetary data on screen.
Do you have a recommended screen reader for testing?DazOn 30/01/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Martin,I have sorted all issues highlighted apart from the DL for the address as only one item will ever appear - would DL still be appropriate? and microformats leave with me.Daz
On 30/01/06, Martin Heiden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Darren,on Monday, January 30, 2006 at 12:26
Should an agent's address really be a definition list??
If you want that sort of semantic pedantry, the markup should be:
block tag
hxAcme Estate Agents/hx
dl
dtAddress/dt
dd
The...Housebr/
Lodge Roa...4DD/dd
dtTelephone/dt
dd0208
How about the list of class 'properties', should that be an un-ordered list?DazOn 30/01/06, Stephen Stagg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Should an agent's address really be a definition list??
If you want that sort of semantic pedantry, the markup should be:block taghxAcme Estate
Stephen,
on Monday, January 30, 2006 at 17:01 wsg@webstandardsgroup.org wrote:
Should an agent's address really be a definition list??
I only wrote that I would do it that way.
If you want that sort of semantic pedantry, the markup should be:
block tag
hxAcme Estate Agents/hx
dl
Thanks all for your assistance!
:-)
--ZacharyOn 10/3/05, Alan Trick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just looked at the page in a text browser (links) and there's a coupleof anoying issues.1. This is not bad, but a bit of an anoyance. There is a notice aboutnot having _javascript_. This appears at the
Nolan Winthrop wrote:
Thanks for the comments, Georg, Wybe. I've made some corrections to
it: notably shifting to percentages and ems for font-sizes; changing
to onfocus for the search form.
The use of small root-value for font-size (76% on body in your case) has
the negative side-effect of
On 3 Oct 2005, at 5:47 pm, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
I do have one question that just came up while I was chatting with a
friend: Does the hreflang attribute on links do anything, really,
or is it just a cosmetic thing that no browser does anything with?
(I'm using it on links to materials in
On http://www.hopkinsprogramming.net/products/vbdoodle/ the text in the
'VB DOODLE' box is overfollowing. This is on Firefox 1.0.7 Gentoo Linux.
My guess is that this is an issue with fonts because my default font is
not that ugly monster (:P) known as Times New Romans. Fonts tend to be
quite an
@Alan - I'm still working on the subsequent pages. The home page is all ive updated at the moment.
Thx for the heads up.
@All - Still need suggestions on the WAI conundrum.
Thanks all!
---ZacharyOn 10/3/05, Alan Trick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
Hopkins Programming wrote:
@All - Still need suggestions on the WAI conundrum.
http://www.hopkinsprogramming.net/
Well, I think you should definitely put some descriptive text in those
links, as my text-only browsers can't even see that there are links
there at the moment. Don't think that
I just looked at the page in a text browser (links) and there's a couple
of anoying issues.
1. This is not bad, but a bit of an anoyance. There is a notice about
not having javascript. This appears at the top of the page. I don't
think this is really neccisary. If you really want it, put it at
Nolan Winthrop wrote:
http://www.47words.com
Not exactly following best practices, with font-sizes _and_
line-heights defined in pixels.
You're getting the usual result: blocking font-resizing
in IE/win and causing text-overlapping in IE/win and Opera if user
overrides font-sizes.
In short:
Hi Nolan
I like it.
I was a bit surprised by the blue on hover. Surprise is good, but i
don't know about the blue.
In your search option you use some _javascript_ which isn't very stable.
If the focus is on the input field and i reload the page (in FF) the
hole thing is gone. No input field,
Hopkins Programming wrote:
http://www.hopkinsprogramming.net/
Your px sized containers aren't giving their content enough room to fit:
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/hopkinsp1.png
If you set height in em's vertical inadequacy shouldn't happen.
--
Be quick to listen, slow to speak.
I can change those. But, the backgrounds are set not to repeat
vertically. So would it be better to a) Let the text flow into
empty white space; b) set a bckgound color and let it flow into that;
or c) let the background repeat?
Also, just how far up should I assume a user may set their text?
You can't just measure it by IE's +2 and -2, because for users with widescreen displays, the default is something like +1. This is because widescreen Windows XP runs at 120 dpi rather than the standard 96 dpi, and to compensate for small text, the text is automatically set to be larger. Therefore
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm says:
use plain text email
Hopkins Programming wrote:
On 10/2/05, Felix Miata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopkins Programming wrote:
http://www.hopkinsprogramming.net/
Your px sized containers aren't giving their content
Ok guys, I've reworked some of the heights and background images to allow for extended text resizing.
I think I got all of the big stuff, does it look work ok for you now Felix?
--ZacharyOn 10/2/05, Felix Miata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm says:use
Thanks for the comments, Georg, Wybe. I've made some corrections to
it: notably shifting to percentages and ems for font-sizes; changing
to onfocus for the search form.
I do have one question that just came up while I was chatting with a
friend: Does the hreflang attribute on links do anything,
Hopkins Programming wrote:
http://www.hopkinsprogramming.net/
Ok guys, I've reworked some of the heights and background images to
allow for extended text resizing.
I think I got all of the big stuff, does it look work ok for you now
Felix?
You're still not giving several things enough
Ok, For the moment being, I am going to ignore the links in the top right corner and the fieldset in the bottom left.
What do you think about the WAI issue? Keep the p's and
add in a small span of text inside the link, or put all of the
p text into a span and use that?
--zacharyOn 10/2/05, Felix
Nolan Winthrop wrote:
http://www.47words.com
You're not providing enough width for all content to fit in the allotted
space . . .
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/47words1.png
. . . nor the content enough size to be comfortably read:
http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/auth/area76.html
(the content
Hello David,
Over site impression cool
its well structured and well designed. Especially I liked color scheme of the site.
Some Suggestions:
Somehow I am missing link to HOME Page. My observation is majority of people expect to see a Home link. It's not enough that logo is a link to
Amit,
Many thanks for your suggestions - I agree with them all!
We will definitely take action to improve the site according to your ideas.
Kind regards
David
On 8/3/05, Amit Pimpalnerkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello David,
Over site impression –cool… its well structured and
Hi David,
I would really appreciate your comments about our recently redeveloped
http://www.salmonrecipes.net/ site.
Please do not be scared to be critical. I'm keen to improve the site
in any way possible, so please let me know what you think we could do
better.
Beautiful site. Um, not
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:46 +0100, David Nicol wrote:
I would really appreciate your comments about our recently redeveloped
http://www.salmonrecipes.net/ site.
Just quickly... wow. I didn't know a site about fish could look so
good :P Except for the flickery monstrosity at the top (banner ad
Prabhath,
Thanks for your thoughts about the Advanced Search - I totally agree
that we need to improve this element. We'll experiment with some
ideas.
Regarding the banner, we will be selling this space again soon. I'm
not sure if it would be sensible to retain a 'veto' on the banner
designs
Beautiful! It's just that the banner ad is rather jarring in its
present location. Anything you can do about that? When I see
salmonrecipes.com with the ad right next to it, it's a bit confusing.
Others have given you just the input I would have given. Obviously you
put a lot of thought
David Nicol wrote:
Hello everyone,
I would really appreciate your comments about our recently redeveloped
http://www.salmonrecipes.net/ site.
David
Nice stuff(I mean Salmon), David. I had to go rather extraordinary means
to find any problem-- if, in fact, some of these browsers are even
Nicely done! I have a quick question for you (or anyone)... what is the purpose of this code?
#content-ctr:after{ display:block; visibility:hidden; content:.; clear:both; height:0; }/* \*/* html #content-ctr{height:1%}/* */
--
Thanks!
Matt Harris
www.focusontheclouds.com
On 8/2/05, David Laakso
Leslie,
Thanks for your input - we are working on the banner ad issue now. The
short term solution is to find a better advert to place on the site -
in the longer term, I think we may find an altogether better way to
use this space.
David (Laakso)
Many thanks for the BrowserCam link - I must
Initial comment, since the site is all about Salmon, probably not worth
repeating it in the navigation buttons:
Cooking Salmon - Cooking
Buy Salmon - Buy
Salmon Resources - Resources
Apart from that, initial look, looks nice. And it being lunch time and all!
Regards
Ed Henderson
Web Man
Matt,
I'm reliably informed by our in-house CSS 'guru' that you'll find your
answer here@
http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html
Hope this makes some sense.
Cheers
David
On 8/2/05, Matt Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicely done! I have a quick question for you (or
Ed
I'm inclined to agree with you about there being no need to duplicate
'salmon' so much.
We did debate this quite a lot in the office, and I suspect we'll
change this next time we do any work on the menu system.
cheers
David
On 8/2/05, Ed Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Initial
Thanks, David!On 8/2/05, David Nicol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt,I'm reliably informed by our in-house CSS 'guru' that you'll find youranswer here@http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html
Hope this makes some sense.CheersDavid
Hi,
Don't have time to nit-pick, going for Salmon. You've certainly
achieved your marketing goals!
C
On Aug 2, 2005, at 3:46 AM, David Nicol wrote:
Hello everyone,
I would really appreciate your comments about our recently redeveloped
http://www.salmonrecipes.net/ site.
Please do not be
Hi again everyone,
Thanks for your continued positive comments. FYI, we have changed the
banner ad to something more in-keeping with the rest of the site. Hope
you like it.
Felix ... thanks for the many links. I'll look at them all, and willl
discuss the matters in question with the team here.
Hi Levi,
Just looking through the list and saw that you didn't get many replies,
so I thought I'd have a shot.
You might not have got much of an answer because there's not much to
say.
My first impression is that there's not much on the site to draw me in
or make me want to come back, that may
The modular interface on top is kind of cool. To me it feels like the whole
thing should be certered with a black background.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for
Neerav wrote:
Looks nice, wish I could afford it :-)
The only 2 small problems I see are caused by the standard text size
being too small, so I choose medium size text (in Firefox 1.0 Win
2000 1024x768) and:
1. Making your African Dreams a Reality! is overlapped by Lodges
Hotels
2. Terms
Looks nice, wish I could afford it :-)
The only 2 small problems I see are caused by the standard text size
being too small, so I choose medium size text (in Firefox 1.0 Win 2000
1024x768) and:
1. Making your African Dreams a Reality! is overlapped by Lodges
Hotels
2. Terms Conditions and
Great Site
Everything works OK.
regards
---
Vision.To Design
Femi Hasani
www.vision.to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+46 736 009 555
Sweden / Suedi
www.coder24.com
www.wowdev.com
---
- Original Message -
On 22 Mar 2005, at 23:34, Tatham Oddie wrote:
All,
Without out taking up too much of your time, itd be great if you
could take a look at http://testdrive.fueladvance.com/ and let me know
anything that leaps in your face as bad.
Please be brutal.
(PS. Notice the XHTML1.1 validating ASP.NET? J)
Other than the 404 errors on some of the menu items (which I assume you
already knew about :) the only thing I can see is a couple of validation
issues:
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A//testdrive.fueladvance.com/Default.aspx
just to do with the html tag
Otherwise looking
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:34:38 +1100, Tatham Oddie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Without out taking up too much of your time, it'd be great if you could
take
a look at http://testdrive.fueladvance.com/
[...]
Nice, clean, and simple. Setting font-size 0.9em on the body is doing a
number in IE on
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Connolley
Sent: Wednesday, 23 March 2005 11:09 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site Review: testdrive.fueladvance.com
On 22 Mar 2005, at 23:34, Tatham Oddie wrote:
All,
Without out taking up too much of your
Seems to validate as XHTML 1.0 strict...maybe that was the doc type you
had in mind when coding?
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Ftestdrive.fueladvance.com
%2FDefault.aspxcharset=%28detect+automatically%29doctype=XHTML+1.0
+Strictverbose=1
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 19:28 -0500, David
using CSS.
What were the HTML errors you found?
Thanks again!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Laakso
Sent: Wednesday, 23 March 2005 11:29 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site Review: testdrive.fueladvance.com
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of diona kidd
Sent: Wednesday, 23 March 2005 11:59 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site Review: testdrive.fueladvance.com
Seems to validate as XHTML 1.0 strict...maybe that was the doc type you
had in mind when coding?
http
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:58:24 +1100, Tatham Oddie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
David,
[...]
As for the alt text - there's no image! If you take a look at the HTML
it is
just a series of H1 and H2 elements. The image replacement is done
totally
using CSS.
In FF there are two words Fuel Advance--
Tatham Oddie wrote:
I've learned that artificial intelligence is no match for natural
stupidity.
--
All,
Without out
taking up too much of your time, itd
be great if you could take a look at http://testdrive.fueladvance.com/
and let me know anything that leaps in your face
the whole thing dynamic.
Tat
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Peter J. Farrell
Sent: Wednesday, 23 March 2005
1:45 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site Review:
testdrive.fueladvance.com
Tatham Oddie
wrote:
I've learned
Thank you Peter for the quick response and heads-up!
I'm puzzled because I'm using Windows XP Home edition and checked the site
in IE 6 and FF 1.0, and the logo isn't skewed. I'm using absolute
positioning for the logo, therefore if any of the many WSG experts can
provide some advice, or solution
G'day
I'm puzzled because I'm using Windows XP Home edition and checked the site
in IE 6 and FF 1.0, and the logo isn't skewed. I'm using absolute
positioning for the logo, therefore if any of the many WSG experts can
provide some advice, or solution it would be greatly appreicated.
I'd say you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Thank you Peter for the quick response and heads-up!
I'm puzzled because I'm using Windows XP Home edition and checked the site
in IE 6 and FF 1.0, and the logo isn't skewed. I'm using absolute
positioning for the logo, therefore if any of the many WSG experts can
Ingo Chao schrieb:
And this may cause the drop of the right column-float under the content when the viewport is
sized wide enough.
Sorry, maybe this effect is not reproduceable on your font/screen/cache
settings, so here is a screenshot of the drop in IE6
Thanks Bert, but please know that I didn't make any assumptions about
screen resolution, but simply failed to checked the site in 800X600. I
always check my sites in different screen resolutions, but dropped the
ball this time.
Thanks for the reminder, and I'll fix the problem accordingly.
Kind
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning mates,
I've just completed a re-design of a customer's site using web standards.
My XHTML (strict) and CSS validate with no errors. I'm primarily
interested in feedback pertaining to my code and how closely it adheres to
proper semantic markup.
In addition,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning mates,
I've just completed a re-design of a customer's site using web standards.
My XHTML (strict) and CSS validate with no errors. I'm primarily
interested in feedback pertaining to my code and how closely it adheres to
proper semantic markup.
In addition,
Title: RE: [WSG] Site Review - CAR SELLER PORTAL
We proud to be the first car seller world wide portal to use XHTML and Webstandards
...I'd wait until AFTER your page validates before saying things like that, and check! (http://www.autotrader.co.uk)
Your fieldsets are also missing legends
Dear Mr. Mason.
I suppose that you DIDN´T understood what i wrote before.
I said X HTML Web Standards, and for me, that site, even uses HTML tags
as you can see follows...
div style=position:absolute;left:0px;top:117px;color:white;
bTo activate all search settings above pleasefont color=red
a
Title: RE: [WSG] Site Review - CAR SELLER PORTAL
Am I looking at the right site? http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1=http%3A//www.meucarronovo.com.br/ doesn't validate
-Original Message-
From: Genau Lopes Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 March 2005 13:46
To: wsg
good work, only two things :
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.meucarronovo.com.br%2F;verbose=1
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://www.meucarronovo.com.br/c/mcn.css
regards
Daniele
http://www.gizax.it
Internet Accessibility
- Original Message -
From:
Hi Daniele,
You wrote:
good work, only two things :
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.meucarronovo.com.br%2F;verbose=1
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://www.meucarronovo.com.br/c/mcn.css
Hmmm I checked:
*Can you escape an ampersand using an
entity such as #38; in JavaScript code and still
have the script work?
*Gene,
Good question. I dont know.
I will try fix that.
Thanks.
Gene Falck wrote:
Hi Daniele,
You wrote:
good work, only two things :
quote*Can you escape an ampersand using an
entity such as #38; in JavaScript code and still
have the script work?
*Gene,
Good question. I dont know.
I will try fix that.
Thanks.
Gene,
I tried switch the javascript ampersands , by ASCII code , but the js
didn´t works.
Anyone
Genau Lopes Jr. wrote:
Gene,
I tried switch the javascript ampersands , by ASCII code , but the js
didn´t works.
Anyone knows how to switch for a valid character?
Thanks,
Genau L. Jr
One solution is to move the javascript to an external file and call it
with a src attribute. The other is to
Gene Falck wrote:
Hi Erik,
Which is about what I was suspecting--its one thing
to give the user agent an entity when what you want
is a text rendering of a character and quite another
to use an entity where the program must treat it as
part of your coding. BTW, do you see any difference
in this
Erik,
You where right! My code was validated inserting spaces between the
"" and "" characters.
My doubt is know why the validators odnt understand those characters
togheter. I will try to find some documentation and DOM specifies to
discover why that happpens.
BTW, Erik, you advice was very
Hi Erik,
You wrote:
I tend to have all of my javascript in external files
which is the other way to make sure that this doesn't
happen.
Great way to stay away from the validation of code
included within an HTML file. I have one situation
in which I can't see that as a solution. The file
is a real
No replied after 13 days... yeesh. Was it that bad or that good? no
comments at all? worked perfect on everyone's computer/browsers?
here is the url again: http://ffxi.anime-madness.com
-levi
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:36:17 -0500, Levi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy, I've been coming signed up
Hi Levi,
Looks stable in Safari 1.2.4 and Mac/Firefox but the news inner containers
are missing their backgrounds in Mac/IE5.2.8. I can send screenshots offlist
if needed.
The other comments are accessibility ones so take them as you wish - they
may not be part of the mission for this site's
Standards advice is free.
But I charge for site reviews.
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 04:52:55 -0500, Levi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No replied after 13 days... yeesh. Was it that bad or that good? no
comments at all? worked perfect on everyone's computer/browsers?
here is the url again:
Looks stable in Safari 1.2.4 and Mac/Firefox but the news inner containers
are missing their backgrounds in Mac/IE5.2.8. I can send screenshots offlist
if needed.
hmm. I dont know that screenshots will be needed, since I can pretty
much assume what you are talking about and know what it looks
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
