RE: [WSG] Style part of form field

2005-03-28 Thread Sarah Peeke (XERT)
Hi Ted > I saw a reference to styling optgroup within an option list on one of the > resources. Try a google search for optgroup css. Thanks for this, but it's not exactly what I was looking for. The tag "defines a group of options in a selectable list"

Re: [WSG] Style part of form field - and Unicode

2005-03-28 Thread Juergen Auer
Hi Siggy, thanks for your informations. Mhmm ... FireFox comes with an built-in font and shows Unicode 2.1 and 3.0, the 'West Syriac Cross' and the East (#x2670 and 2671, both 3.0) are shown in FireFox correctly. The Microsoft Arial Unicode Font, which is part of Office 2000 and higher, but op

Re: [WSG] Style part of form field

2005-03-28 Thread ailingwebss
Hay, Siggy Thanks for this email . it is usefull Best regards CAI www.studiocai.com creative director & web designer - Original Message - From: "Sigurd Magnusson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 9:25 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] Style part of form

Re: [WSG] Style part of form field

2005-03-28 Thread Sigurd Magnusson
http://www.sql-und-xml.de/unicode-database/miscellaneous-symbols.html All symbols of version 2.1 are shown in standard-browsers. Actually, while when I loaded this up (in FireFox), I was happily surprised that all symbols showed, I noticed that IE6 showed WAY less than half of them... perhaps t

RE: [WSG] Style part of form field

2005-03-28 Thread Drake, Ted C.
I saw a reference to styling optgroup within an option list on one of the resources. Try a google search for optgroup css. Ted -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sarah Peeke (XERT) Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 5:17 PM To: WSG Subject: [WSG] S

Re: [WSG] Style part of form field

2005-03-28 Thread Juergen Auer
Hi Sarah, ehm ... such a specification would be private - no browser would accept this. Its possible to use the XHtml1.1-specification (or every other spec) and add own additional definitions. Reading your sentence in your first mail >I cannot seem to find any reference to whether the > fo

Re: [WSG] Style part of form field

2005-03-28 Thread Sarah Peeke (XERT)
Hi Juergen Thanks for your reply. I am not familiar with this specification. Can you point me to a link or other info on this? > you would need an own specification > > > > then this would work. But not with the official things. > > Instead you may use some unicode-characters instead of pho

Re: [WSG] Style part of form field

2005-03-28 Thread Juergen Auer
On 28 Mar 2005 at 11:16, Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote: > Hi all > > I would like to be able to give a different style to *part* of an option > field within a form. > I cannot seem to find any reference to whether the following is possible: > > > > Name (with photo) > Name (with photo) > Name (wit

Re: [WSG] Style part of form field

2005-03-28 Thread Bert Doorn
G'day I would like to be able to give a different style to *part* of an option field within a form. I cannot seem to find any reference to whether the following is possible: Name (with photo) Ideally the words within the tags would be styled differently to those outside. Can anyone shed any ligh