The problem is that the test pass in level A, and some links doesnt
work without javascript but because of a existense of a noscript the
test pass.
I think this should get a manual check or warning.
because almost noscript that i see just tell, this need flash plugin
or this site need javascrip
yes thats is my oppinion too, but the clients only gona see if pass or not.
And for many developments that's all that matter.
On 23/10/2007, Patrick Lauke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Gaspar
>
> > I think this should get a manual check or warning.
>
> You should ALWAYS do human checks of whate
> Gaspar
> I think this should get a manual check or warning.
You should ALWAYS do human checks of whatever an automated validation tools
tells you, unless it's something purely technical (e.g. does markup validate to
spec).
P
Patrick H. Lauke
Web Editor
Enterp
The problem is that the test pass in level A, and some links doesnt
work without javascript but because of a existense of a noscript the
test pass.
I think this should get a manual check or warning.
because almost noscript that i see just tell, this need flash plugin
or this site need javascript o
Hi,
CynthiaSays should only be used as a first step so passing any online
automated accessibility test by no means guarantee's that a site is
accessible so you should always do a manual check.
The search is definitely not accessible on the link you've provided as
it simply doesn't work without Ja
