Re: [WSG] turning back to the dark side...

2004-03-09 Thread Leo J. O'Campo
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 09/03/04 4:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] turning back to the dark side... Good one Ross! Nice site ... though maybe a bit more leading in the body copy would make it easy to read (sorry for being picky). And by the way ... I'm your father. Peter

Re: [WSG] turning back to the dark side...

2004-03-09 Thread Robert Moser
Paul Ross wrote: If anyone wants to see the finished version check out: http://www.books24x7.net.au - just don't view source on the New Releases page Why is there a script after the closing /html? Does that script (a statistics collector) even work in that location?

Re: [WSG] turning back to the dark side...

2004-03-08 Thread Paul Ross
As a footnote to this thread I want to add that I did in fact stick to the light and the way and the website was launched as XHTML/CSS. In my darkest hour of frustration I did try and re-do the pages with HTML tables and found that it was causing more troubles than it was worth. So, I persisted

RE: [WSG] turning back to the dark side...

2004-03-08 Thread Amit Karmakar
, Amit Karmakar www.karmakars.com -Original Message- From: Paul Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 9 March 2004 4:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] turning back to the dark side... As a footnote to this thread I want to add that I did in fact stick to the light

Re: [WSG] turning back to the dark side...

2004-03-08 Thread Universal Head
Good one Ross! Nice site ... though maybe a bit more leading in the body copy would make it easy to read (sorry for being picky). And by the way ... I'm your father. Peter ;) On 09/03/2004, at 4:00 PM, Paul Ross wrote: As a footnote to this thread I want to add that I did in fact stick to the

RE: [WSG] turning back to the dark side...

2004-03-08 Thread Brendan Smith
And by the way ... I'm your father. Am I to take it then that CSS is essentially a bunch of Jedi mind tricks? Brendan From: Universal Head [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 09/03/04 4:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] turning back to the dark

RE: [WSG] turning back to the dark side...

2004-03-08 Thread Amit Karmakar
Oops! That should have been Ross, not Paul Sorry about that. Regards, Amit Karmakar www.karmakars.com -Original Message- From: Amit Karmakar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 9 March 2004 4:09 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [WSG] turning back to the dark side

RE: [WSG] turning back to the dark side...

2004-03-08 Thread Hill, Tim
: Tuesday, 9 March 2004 4:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] turning back to the dark side... As a footnote to this thread I want to add that I did in fact stick to the light and the way and the website was launched as XHTML/CSS. In my darkest hour of frustration I did try and re-do

Re: [WSG] turning back to the dark side...

2004-03-07 Thread LC 55
Sorry for barging in here Michael. This is a bit OT, but I need to send you (Michael Donnermeyer) a PM to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]. So if you see, From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please open it, as it will be in plain text format with no attachments added. I have already tried to email you, but received no

Re: [WSG] turning back to the dark side...

2004-03-06 Thread Michael Donnermeyer
You actually expect Microsoft to create a product that works?!? G How about one that follows standards? (RIGHT!) All kidding aside, it's a royal pain in the U know what and it'll probably result in 'pattern baldness' from ripping your own hair out, but in the long run it'll be worth it.

RE: [WSG] turning back to the dark side...

2004-03-04 Thread Chris Blown
That's good advice. BTW. Using tables doesn't automatically make your markup invalid. You can happily use tables and still get 100% compliant markup. Chris Blown http://hinterlands.com.au Why not just relax a little and do a table for the part that's giving you all the heartburn, and move on