Re: [WSG] Browser Check

2007-09-08 Thread Rahul Gonsalves
On 07-Sep-07, at 10:17 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Browser check for the following site: http://www.condometropolis.com/buy_orlando_condos.php? Name=action=searchSubmit=Browse+All+Condos!first=yes I get a MySQL error: Warning: mysql_connect(): Access denied for user:

Re: Re: [WSG] Browser Check

2007-09-08 Thread nroper
Thank you for your email. I shall be away from the office between September 8th and September 17th. If your enquiry is urgent, then please call my assistant on 01749 676798 in my absence. Kind regards, Nick Roper *** List

Re: [WSG] Browser Check

2007-09-07 Thread Joseph Taylor
Jorge, The site looks good. You might want to start by fixing the 246 validation errors in your HTML just on that pageno offense intended. The other pages have similar issues too. (Firefox 2 on Mac) There are a couple nested tag closure issues, which could well be your problem with the

Re: [WSG] Browser Check

2007-09-07 Thread Christian Montoya
On 9/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Browser check for the following site: http://www.condometropolis.com/buy_orlando_condos.php?Name=action=searchSubmit=Browse+All+Condos!first=yes Sorry to be off-topic, but is that domain name set in stone? Reading it left to right can be

Re: [WSG] Browser Check

2007-09-07 Thread jcolon82
Yep, it's set in stone. They have nearly 3k unique visitors per month. I guess it's really not affecting the traffic. Jorge Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Browser check for the following site:

Re: [WSG] Browser Check with Firefox 1.5

2007-04-17 Thread Jonathan O'Donnell
Hi Samuel Just for interest, I checked it in both Firefox 1.5.0.6 and Opera 9.01 on Mac OS X 10.4.9. In both cases, the page background is a red tile pattern with orange highlights. The text area appears as a very very pale red (or deep pink) surrounding a white background for the form.

Re: [WSG] Browser Check with Firefox 1.5

2007-04-17 Thread Benedict Wyss
I have FF 2.0 and it renders fine on first and second glance. Fix up those strict validation issues and see how you go again. Rgds', Ben On 4/17/07, Jonathan O'Donnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Samuel Just for interest, I checked it in both Firefox 1.5.0.6 and Opera 9.01 on Mac OS X

Re: [WSG] Browser check Site crit please

2005-11-30 Thread Richard Stephenson
Thanks for the advice. I've never used mailing lists before. I usually just google stuff! but this one seems very helpful. On 11/30/05, Rick Faaberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/29/05 5:59 AM Richard Stephenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out: Hi everyone, I just joined this list I like

Re: [WSG] Browser check Site crit please

2005-11-30 Thread Steve Ferguson
On Nov 29, 2005, at 5:59 AM, Richard Stephenson wrote: I have been working on my blog http://www.donkeymagic.co.uk for a while and it works ok in my browsers FF an IE6 on the pc but i have no access to mac browsers and little experince of mac css bugs/filters. Any help/advice/critisism will

Re: [WSG] Browser check Site crit please

2005-11-29 Thread Jay Gilmore
Richard Stephenson wrote: Hi everyone, I just joined this list and I have just plucked up courage to ask you all to subject me to the humilitation that is my first site check! I have been working on my blog http://www.donkeymagic.co.uk Richard, Looks pretty good. Here are a couple

Re: [WSG] Browser check Site crit please

2005-11-29 Thread Rick Faaberg
On 11/29/05 5:59 AM Richard Stephenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out: Hi everyone, I just joined this list I like it when there's a site identifier in the subject of the emails. Doesn't have to be the site name (so your customer won't find it) but just some identifier like problems with Mac

Re: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!

2004-12-29 Thread designer
- Original Message - From: Lori Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 12:21 AM Subject: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies! So, before heading this way for some help, I checked out the site on many platforms.

RE: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!

2004-12-29 Thread Lori Leach
Subject: Re: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies! ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **

Re: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!

2004-12-29 Thread David Laakso
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 08:52:51 -0500, Lori Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is the page with a larger font size (done in points) for all content, and a width now added to the right float. Does it still fall under the left side? http://www.zenfulcreations.com/sites/sss/index.htm

RE: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!

2004-12-29 Thread Lori Leach
that there is nothing I can do - right? Lori Leach ZenfulCreations -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Laakso Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 9:49 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies! On Wed

Re: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!

2004-12-29 Thread David Laakso
PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Laakso Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 9:49 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies! On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 08:52:51 -0500, Lori Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is the page with a larger font size (done in points) for all

Re: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!

2004-12-29 Thread David Laakso
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 09:50:04 -0500, Lori Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David, Thanks for looking... Apparently then there is nothing that I can do to keep the menu from breaking when you zoom as I have a fixed width design and not fluid. I am in a corner of sorts, as this is the layout he

Re: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!

2004-12-29 Thread Gunlaug Srtun
Lori Leach wrote: Apparently then there is nothing that I can do to keep the menu from breaking when you zoom as I have a fixed width design and not fluid. I am in a corner of sorts, as this is the layout he wants, refuses fluid, and this is the menu he wants. So I conclude that there is

RE: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!

2004-12-29 Thread Lori Leach
Thank You Georg and everyone for your help. Georg, I will use much of what you have said to correct the pages. Again, thank you. The link for this however will no longer work, as the SEC needs to approve the content for them prior to publish, and I can't have it on my server for any length of

Re: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!

2004-12-28 Thread Kornel Lesinski
Konqueror 3.0.5 Wow, amazing it works. CSS in Konq 3.0 is sooo bug ridden. Safaried Konq 3.3 behaves much better. IE4 - PC Ignore it. IE4 is suicidcal when it comes to CSS. All Versions of Opera If in Opera 6, you can ignore it. But if it breaks in latest Opera you have a problem. Opera 7.5

Re: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!

2004-12-28 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Lori Leach wrote: http://www.zenfulcreations.com/sites/sss/ http://www.zenfulcreations.com/sites/sss/c/global.css So - can I get a double check on the ones that appear to work okay, and some possible direction on what I need to do to get it to work right in the ones that don't... I really

Re: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!

2004-12-28 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On 29 Dec 2004, at 9:21 am, Lori Leach wrote: http://www.zenfulcreations.com/sites/sss/ http://www.zenfulcreations.com/sites/sss/c/global.css Netscape 6.2 - PC IE5 - Mac (looks different at different resolutions) IE4 - PC All Versions of Opera So - can I get a double check on the ones that appear