RE: [WSG] restricting width in the body tag

2008-03-27 Thread Andrew Boyd
: [WSG] restricting width in the body tag William Donovan wrote: Hi all, I wanted to ask a question of better practice and current standards view. Is it better to have a header and footer stretch across the width of the browser window or be restricted to the width of the defined. left aligned

Re: [WSG] restricting width in the body tag

2008-03-26 Thread Chris Broadfoot
William Donovan wrote: Hi all, I wanted to ask a question of better practice and current standards view. Is it better to have a header and footer stretch across the width of the browser window or be restricted to the width of the defined. left aligned content area. Leaving lots of vacant

RE: [WSG] restricting width in the body tag

2008-03-26 Thread Paul Bennett
Hi William, It sounds like you're looking for something like a 'jello layout' (term not mine) You can find out more here: http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/jello.html Basically a jello layout will expand and shrink with the browser window but only to a defined minimum / maximum.

RE: [WSG] restricting width in the body tag

2008-03-26 Thread Andrew Boyd
Hi William my preference is to view banner elements in a 100% wide chunk that blend (hopefully) for a seamless look. I acknowledge that this is not always possible (or desirable). As a 1680 pixel wide laptop user I have to agree that fixed width is an issue, especially for totally

Re: Re: [WSG] restricting width in the body tag

2008-03-26 Thread William Donovan
A design issue, possibly, However the end basis for decisions are standards and evidence, and was wondering if there was any out there. If no real evidence is available, the it is up to those with the strongest opinion. Good note on assessing environments and user requirements, however that