Greetings
I'm building new website which will only have a photo gallery, so I
was thinking how can I accomplish it without breaking standards and
usability...
please advise
--
Web standards Planet
http://www.w3planet.info/
Personal Blogger
http://www.EasyHTTP.com/jad/
EasyHTTP Network
Greetings
I'm building new website which will only have a photo gallery, so I
was thinking how can I accomplish it without breaking standards and
usability...
please advise
Try some of these:
http://www.maxdesign.com.au/presentation/definition/dl-image-gallery.htm
Have a look too at my www.withoutgrass.com site. An original approach,
AFAIK.
Bob McClelland,
Cornwall (U.K.)
www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk
- Original Message -
From: russ - maxdesign [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Web Standards Group wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2005 1:40
Ahh, but the problem with using blockquote there is that you're
trying to differentiate between content from the site owner and
content from contributors. However, both those people are 'authors' on
the blog, the blog article and blog comments are both first-hand
content.
blockquote marks up
Hi,
Has any knowledgeable soul read: Web Standards Design Guide (Internet
Series)
[url]http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1584503874/ref%3Dpe%5Fsnp%
5F874/002-1365210-3711235[/url],
if so what is the consensus?
CK
__
Knowing is not enough, you must
Hi,
Not only a nice solution, but a vigorous workout with standards and
list.
G/L
CK
How to Create a Photographic Gallery Using CSS:
http://www.webreference.com/programming/css_gallery/index.html
On May 29, 2005, at 5:21 AM, Jad Madi wrote:
Greetings
I'm building new website which
On Sun, 29 May 2005 15:46:29 +0100, Chris Kennon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How to Create a Photographic Gallery Using CSS:
http://www.webreference.com/programming/css_gallery/index.html
I don't like it. It works only on hover and that's Bad Thing for usability
and accessiblity.
I can't use
actually i'm having a problem in my project, I have to have category
for every person, with his albums
so the site become so ugly and so huge, and the current content is
only 20% of what I have
would you mind to take a look
http://joite.org/gallery/
On 5/29/05, Kornel Lesinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 29 May 2005 16:39:51 +0100, Jad Madi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
actually i'm having a problem in my project, I have to have category
for every person, with his albums
so the site become so ugly and so huge, and the current content is
only 20% of what I have
would you mind to take a look
You've got a lot of validation issues. Over 180 errors, including XHTML
markup while using an HTML 4.01 Transitional DTD.
I think you need to decide if you want to follow that DTD or switch to
an XHTML DTD.
Leslie Riggs
actually i'm having a problem in my project, I have to have category
I'm working on new structure but what i'm trying to discuss now is
The content is huge and cant think of anyway to organize it so it
wont break usability
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
I think the problem you have there is that you're breaking the
pictures down in too many different ways on a single page. You might
find it more managable if you allow users to choose the presentation:
For example, you can separate browsing by:
* Photographer
* Major catagory
* Country (maybe,
Hi,
Sorry, I must have cooties. Didn't intend to offend.
C
On May 29, 2005, at 8:12 AM, Kornel Lesinski wrote:
On Sun, 29 May 2005 15:46:29 +0100, Chris Kennon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How to Create a Photographic Gallery Using CSS:
It is very much a legacy thing these days, since it is being solved
for XHTML 2.0, insofaras you can attach the href= attribute to
pretty much any element you like, regardless of block|inline
condition.
A navigation menu item could be 'li href=homepageHomepage/li'
without the extra a / tag.
On 29-May-05 17:06, Ben Ward wrote:
It is very much a legacy thing these days, since it is being solved
for XHTML 2.0, insofaras you can attach the href= attribute to
pretty much any element you like, regardless of block|inline
condition.
A navigation menu item could be 'li
Heh, well if the blockquote approach is considered overkill, you'll
choke on what I actually use for my comments...
ol
li
dl
dtAndrew said:/dt
ddpThis is my comment. It is the definition of 'Andrew
said' within this context./p/dd
/dl
dl class=date
dtComment
This might be off topic. I am not sure if I should create seperate CSS files
for my header and footer, embed the CSS into one file with the HTML . or
Have the css in my css main file and call the main file. I would like to
keep to web standards and a small download for dialup users. Any
I may be a little late to reply but hopefully this will help you all
as much as it helped me.
A lot of scalable programming is done using a framework of some sort
(a set of prewritten bits of code aka modules) but a lot of designers
are afraid, or confused by that pure geek way of thinking (i
It's best to stick to one CSS file (if you're thinking about
seperating CSS rules based on the section of the page).
However, it's easier to maintain CSS if you seperate positioning and
other decorative/typography styles in to seperate files (E.g.:
layout.css and main.css).
Prabhath
It's best to stick to one CSS file (if you're thinking about
seperating CSS rules based on the section of the page).
Hi Prabhath, can you explain why it's best to stick to one CSS file.
I found it easier to maintain to create separate CSS file under such
circumstance, say, the CSS rules only
G'day
http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/Articles/12/modular-css
http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/Articles/17/a-css-framework
Mike Stenhouse from contentwithstyle explains it way better than I could!
The biggest problem, and perhaps the biggest difference between
the web and program(mer)s
21 matches
Mail list logo
