I am finally to begin to stop supporting IE6 starts from 2011 as the usage has
fallen below 5%. I don't want the IE6 users to see a broken page due to no
special treatment made for the browser, rather, I would like them to see an
un-styled page as if the style sheet has switch off.
Can this
Why go that far? Why not let this browser see the CSS and fail gracefully - or
semi-gracefully as needed (as long as the content and navigation are accessible
so that the site can be navigated and read).
On 18/12/2010, at 10:20 PM, tee wrote:
I am finally to begin to stop supporting IE6
On 12/18/10 6:20 AM, tee wrote:
I am finally to begin to stop supporting IE6 starts from 2011 as the usage has
fallen below 5%. I don't want the IE6 users to see a broken page due to no
special treatment made for the browser, rather, I would like them to see an
un-styled page as if the style
Don't have any base, I just think psychologically an un-styled page is better
received than a broken page, and it makes the page loads faster too without
nice transparent background images.
I wouldn't called these two pages failed gracefully. They are semi-broken and
PNG transparent images
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 11:20 AM, tee weblis...@gmail.com wrote:
I am finally to begin to stop supporting IE6 starts from 2011 as the usage
has fallen below 5%. I don't want the IE6 users to see a broken page due to
no special treatment made for the browser, rather, I would like them to see
I am finally to begin to stop supporting IE6 starts from 2011 as the usage has
fallen below 5%. I don't want the IE6 users to see a broken page due to no
special treatment made for the browser, rather, I would like them to see an
un-styled page as if the style sheet has switch off.
Can this
Hi. I think, this example will help you:
!--[if gte IE 6]!--
link rel=stylesheet href=style.css
!--![endif]--
Best,
Anton
2010/12/18 tee weblis...@gmail.com:
I am finally to begin to stop supporting IE6 starts from 2011 as the usage
has fallen below 5%. I don't want the IE6 users to see a
Sorry :)
!--[if gt IE 6]!--
...
of course.
Best,
Anton.
2010/12/18 Anthony Gr. ant.grak...@gmail.com:
Hi. I think, this example will help you:
!--[if gte IE 6]!--
link rel=stylesheet href=style.css
!--![endif]--
Best,
Anton
2010/12/18 tee weblis...@gmail.com:
I am finally to begin
Big companies such as Google and Youtube have had to deal with the IE6
problem on a large scale. Their pages display a warning message to
advise IE6 users that the page may not display correctly, and suggest
upgrading to a more recent browser.
Personally I think it is reasonable to take this
Personally I think it is reasonable to take this approach, given the
age
of IE6 and its declining market share. However I would be interested in
the attitude of other developers.
Imho, we should take care of any layout issue, but not try to get fancy
effects via extra markup, images, filters,
Imho, we should take care of any layout issue, but not try to get fancy
effects via extra markup, images, filters, and other hacks. In short, IE6
should get layout fixes and miss on properties like border-radius,
opacity, etc.
So no need for a specific styles sheet imo.
The reason for
Is there a js file somewhere that would allow me to just insert the following
into my pages:
!--[if lte IE 6]!--
script type=text/javascript src=http://cdn.domain.com/ie6.js;/script
!--![endif]--
It would then pop up a warning to the user (but only once per session) that
their browser was out
The reason for this is twofold though: firstly, you want to coax people off
of IE6.
I don't think that's our job...
--
Regards,
Thierry
www.tjkdesign.com | www.ez-css.org | @thierrykoblentz
***
List Guidelines:
Good points James. When I think about cross-browser compatibility, I try to
keep the following points in mind:
1 - Websites don't have to look the same in each browser. This doesn't mean
that you can ignore how pages render in browsers you don't care about; it means
that if Chrome displays
Also, I forgot to mention - If you are looking to get people to move to a newer
browser, simple implement a small banner, maybe static header or footer, that
recommends some newer browsers.
This can be added into your override CSS file for the outdated browser(s).
Eric Taylor
Elements Aside /
On 2010/12/18 20:33 (GMT-0800) Thierry Koblentz composed:
The reason for this is twofold though: firstly, you want to coax people off of
IE6.
I don't think that's our job...
Who better? Wouldn't you rather IE6/7 disappear sooner than later? You enjoy
the extra effort the too many years
Agreed. Our job is to provide the best web experience the user can have. To do
this, the user will optimally have the most up-to-date browser, as to
experience the latest web technology available.
Eric Taylor
Elements Aside /
http://www.elementsaside.com
On Dec 18, 2010, at 11:49 PM, Felix
On 18 December 2010 22:20, tee weblis...@gmail.com wrote:
I am finally to begin to stop supporting IE6 starts from 2011 as the usage
has fallen below 5%. I don't want the IE6 users to see a broken page due to
no special treatment made for the browser, rather, I would like them to see
an
On 15 December 2010 13:31, Michal Miksik mmik...@gmail.com wrote:
I was advised by an SEO company that : The Title tag should be the first
tag in the HEAD area of the web pages, otherwise search engines may
overlook it which will significantly damage the rankings.
What is the best
The reason for this is twofold though: firstly, you want to coax
people off of IE6.
I don't think that's our job...
Who better? Wouldn't you rather IE6/7 disappear sooner than later? You
enjoy
the extra effort the too many years of its massive non-conformity
causes?
Most people who
Hi Mods can you possibly drop emails from list and digest with subject
containing out of office or autoreply?? 20-50% (at times) of
emails I get from this list are a digest wholly consisting of ringing
out of office responses. Pretty standard list filter to apply.
And for the people doing this
21 matches
Mail list logo
