Re: WSG promoting standards via teaching? Re: [WSG] Positioning was Extra white line on the top of my list

2008-08-05 Thread kevin erickson
I have an idea. Let's let go this for now and let the mediator tell us when we are off the web standards fuzzy line. No? Peace to all! On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:55:13 -0400, David Fuller - magickweb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I spend my development time actually working on client sites...

Re: WSG promoting standards via teaching? Re: [WSG] Positioning was Extra white line on the top of my list

2008-08-05 Thread kevin erickson
You know the saying, 'If you don't like something, ignore it and it will go away'? Let's try that here :D On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:48:57 -0400, Andrew Maben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 5, 2008, at 12:17 PM, Joseph Ortenzi wrote: Would I be considered rude if I asked you to continue this

Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Accessibility coming very soon???

2008-09-03 Thread kevin erickson
I have a huge concern about accessibility here. Apparently Jaws and other screen readers don't work on Google Chrome at all. Can others please confirm? kevin *** List Guidelines:

Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Accessibility coming very soon???

2008-09-03 Thread kevin erickson
at some point, ideally before it comes out of beta. Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kevin erickson Sent: 03 September 2008 16:07 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Google chrome... Accessibility coming very soon??? I

Re: [WSG] Accesbility Help

2008-09-04 Thread kevin erickson
It seems the best alternative might be to have the ability to call you or contact you in some way for verification for handicapped individuals. regards, kevin This is a mixed question, I have a contact form that I'm building. I want to add a human verifier to the forms but not a

Re: [WSG] Accesbility Help

2008-09-04 Thread kevin erickson
reCAPTCHA sounds good. I tried it out and the audio for vision impaired visitors worked fine. The service seems to be free and is set up to digitize old books that cannot be scanned, literally, one word at a time. Pretty amazing! kevin Hi, I've seen this captcha service and, according to

[WSG] Safari Beta 4

2009-02-25 Thread Kevin Erickson
Hi, Anyone know about how the new Safari Beta 4 is handling the current standards of the Web? Thanks, Kevin No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.3/1969 - Release Date: 2/24/2009 6:43 AM

[WSG] E-commerce

2009-02-27 Thread Kevin Erickson
Hi, Does anyone have input on what is a good Web standards e-commerce solution? Thanks, Kevin No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.3/1969 - Release Date: 2/24/2009 6:43 AM

[WSG] Help with mobile MIME type always fails test

2010-04-16 Thread Kevin Erickson
Hello all, I am hoping someone can help me with a MIME for mobile sites problem I am having. I have a page, http://devel.virginiainteractive.org/demo/portalredesign2010/mobile/mobile_p ages/, that will not pass the test for mobile MIME type using the http://mobiready.com/launch.jsp mobile site

[WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

2010-06-15 Thread Kevin Erickson
Hello All, If anyone can help me understand why my mobile page passes all accept the MIME type. Page code: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8? !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//WAPFORUM//DTD XHTML Mobile 1.0//EN http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/xhtml-mobile10.dtd; html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;

Re: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

2010-06-15 Thread Kevin Erickson
, so you may decide just to leave things as they are ;-) Presumably you got this warning from the mobi Ready tool? This uses the same core code as the W3C mobileOK checker http://validator.w3.org/mobile/ (although we've added a lot of extra UI stuff over the last year or so). HTH Phil. Kevin

RE: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

2010-06-15 Thread Kevin Erickson
://validator.w3.org/mobile/ (although we've added a lot of extra UI stuff over the last year or so). HTH Phil. Kevin Erickson wrote: Hello All, If anyone can help me understand why my mobile page passes all accept the MIME type. Page code: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8? !DOCTYPE

RE: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

2010-06-16 Thread Kevin Erickson
for XHTML Basic 1.1 is: !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML Basic 1.1//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-basic/xhtml-basic11.dtd; HTH Phil. Kevin Erickson wrote: Question: For the line, !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//WAPFORUM//DTD XHTML Mobile 1.0//EN http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/xhtml-mobile10

RE: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

2010-06-16 Thread Kevin Erickson
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails The Doctype for XHTML Basic 1.1 is: !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML Basic 1.1//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-basic/xhtml-basic11.dtd; HTH Phil. Kevin Erickson wrote: Question: For the line

Re: [WSG] jQuery courses or training

2011-01-13 Thread Kevin Erickson
Penny, I am using www.Lynda.com. It has a four course on jQuery Essentials. Best luck, Kevin Sent from my BlackBerry® -Original Message- From: Penny Haslop penny.has...@gmail.com Sender: lists@webstandardsgroup.orgDate: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:15:00 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Reply-to:

Re: [WSG] jQuery courses or training

2011-01-13 Thread Kevin Erickson
I meant to say four HOUR course :) Cheers! Sent from my BlackBerry® -Original Message- From: Kevin Erickson kevin_erick...@comcast.net Sender: lists@webstandardsgroup.orgDate: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 03:00:13 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG

[WSG] cross-browser or vendor-specific CSS

2012-06-29 Thread Kevin Erickson
Hi, I am asking if anyone uses http://ecsstender.org/ to write CSS cross-browser code or, if not, what are you using to write CSS cross-browser or vendor-specific code? Many thanks! Kevin *** List Guidelines: