Have you tried to right float the .formContainer? It looks like the
menu left bit is contained by the right side, if you float thr right
side it should be okay, but I can't be sure.
--
Cheers,
Rob.
» http://www.zooibaai.nl/b/
**
The discussion
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:54:15 -0800, Chris Kennon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While browsing the w3.org border properties section, I began to wonder
can borders have background images?
Sorry, not yet. I believe it's in the works for CSS3.
--
Cheers,
Rob.
» http://www.zooibaai.nl/b/
em: the 'font-size' of the relevant font
Not totally. An em is the width of (no shit!) an 'M' glyph. But the
rest is allright for me.
--
Cheers,
Rob.
» http://www.zooibaai.nl/b/
**
The discussion list for
I find the description of font-size a bit dodgy, so I wanted to make
clear that all units have a meaning.
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 11:14:21 +, Iain Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sunday, November 14, 2004, 11:02:43 AM, Rob wrote:
em: the 'font-size' of the relevant font
Not
I find the description of font-size a bit dodgy,
I agree. Defining a font size in terms of a unit that is based on a
font size seems pretty stupid to me too, but that's how it is. There
are lots of stupidities around.
Well, in the print business, it's much more strict, which I prefer.
Creative _Commons_ is the best you can do. Another thing you might
want to add is a link or even generator meta to WordPress. It's
published under the same CC you're referring to.
On the concept: well, someone had to do it.
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 19:44:13 -, Mark Harwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Flump to the rescue: http://flumpcakes.co.uk/css/optimiser/
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 19:34:35 +, john [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that ultimately doing it yourself is the best solution...but it
would be really helpful if I could see an optimised version of my CSS,
for comparison. That's
You can't render a part of a page as HTML, but it is possible to let
PHP parse all pages with some variable or something like that as HTML
instead of XHTML.
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 19:51:21 -0500, Jonathan T. Sage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
good evening -
I've set up my site to serve as XHTML
This has been discussed in the legendary SimpleBits:
http://www.simplebits.com/notebook/2004/08/04/sq.html
Quite some discussion...
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:55:45 +1100, Nick Lo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm curious if and how you are all using the address tag. The HTML 4
spec has this to say:
Because it shouldn't. IE is the one who does it wrong. There is an
extension though, if you're that silly :/
http://www.gadgetopia.com/2004/11/09/FirefoxALTTagsAndTooltips.html
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 10:11:36 +, Joey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am curious as to why Firefox only understands
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:19:19 -, Phil Baines
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Folks,
This is my first message to the list, but I have been watching for a little
while. Weldon to the Administrators for maintaining a good list, and to the
posters for keeping the list so busy!
snip /
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:13:16 -, Phil Baines
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Clean code, except for two silly things I checked in Teifi's site: a
name=content class=skipTonbsp;/a The attribute name should be
replaced by id, and the link may have some content to keep in logical
for screen
How about display:blocking the anchors and then floating them to the right?
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:26:53 +1100, Joshua Leung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Morning people.
I'm having problems justifying some text in a simple manner, could anyone
help?
I want to change.
this:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:02:25 +0930, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a class .pmi in my page and I want style the first line of
differently so that the first line is smaller than the second line. The
code below doesn't seem to work and I was wondering if it was because of
the
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:46:56 +0100, Mathias Bynens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a person, you can of course say fuck you to IE, but as a web
professional I find it impossible to ignore it. [ Ben de Groot -
http://mathibus.com/archives/2004/10/02/phpss/#comment-3 ]
It's totally true. IE is a
On Sat, 1 Jan 2005 14:15:19 -0600, Mani Sheriar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have any suggestions for getting rid of the horizontal scroll? I
see it in FF too and I don't like it but can't quite figure out how to
make it disappear.
Looks great! But on the horizontal scrollbar, I get the
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 05:17:37 +0800, Wong Chin Shin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a list of songs, so ol is the gut reaction. But what about the
information within each song listing? table within a li?
Best for me is an ol with in that per song a dl.
--
Cheers,
Rob.
» http://zooibaai.nl
IE has some sort of auto-clearing, so yeah, it does that. I'm not sure
about the fix though.
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:55:23 +0800, Lyn Patterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
www.westernwebdesign.com.au/host.html
Have a floated box that I want to sit inside and overhang another box.
This
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:01:57 +, David R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
designer wrote:
Hi Robin,
dtTitle/dt
dd link /dd
dd link2 /dd
dd link3 /dd
/dl
I thought that the dt and dd elements had to come in pairs?
Nope. You can have multiple definitions
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 05:06:15 -0800 (PST), dotcompals
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear friends,
Can any one help me with the extension used these days in
some we pages. For example .gne (flickr.com) .pyra .do
(blogger.com). How can these extensions be created what
are its advantages?
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:04:52 -0500, Bruce Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*html li {padding:0;margin:0;}
It's the 'star html' hack, which is only parsed by IE. IE thinks
there's another element 'above' html. There isn't, but hey.
also, I noticed this doesn't validate by w3c, but I see it a
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:19:43 +, David R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments?
I try not to use extraneous DIVs, and the star html selector hack has
been a loyal servant to that.
p { min-width: 620px; }
* html p { width: 620px; } /* IE thinks there's a containing element
around HTML */
--
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:18:18 +1100, Peter Ottery
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so I've designed myself a nice looking navigation scheme that displays
visually whereabouts you are within a site.
That's pretty. Pretty smart stuff.
Now I just need to work out how to sort out the css :)
I've some
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 08:04:46 +1100, Peter Ottery
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you can see, the vertical lines are the catch am trying to think
'outside the square' to solve the prob but I cant see how you could do it
without an id on every and li. I made Archive active in the first list to
Pardon me for continuing this off-topicness, but this just caught my
attention BIG TIME.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 23:12:54 +, Patrick H. Lauke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, thank you for the usual Chewbacca defense...when a discussion on
standards doesn't go the way you like, just point the
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 05:45:43 +, Kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see a lot of high traffic sites that only use the @import method that
would not work well unstyled. Is this acceptable yet?
Well, if you mean that using @import excludes some browsers: it is
acceptable. If you consider
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:26:47 -0500, Alan Trick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Consider the following lines of fake poetry:
Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent,
per conubia nostra per inceptos hymenaeos.
Now consider making a xml document out of it, where you had some
On Apr 5, 2005 6:57 PM, Phil Baines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been finding that the amount of styling a legend will take is rather
limited since the browser applies a certain level of style to it by itself.
I was wondering if any of you guys might know a good resource regarding
styling
On 5/5/05, Julián Landerreche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just curiosity:
Will it be possible (in CSS3) to change the dimension (width, height) of
a background image directly from the stylesheet?
There's work on 'stretch'. Read the draft to know more.
So, you can use a tiny image to create a
On 5/5/05, Jan Brasna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SVG ;)
Jan, I thought we try to pursue a goal here: working stuff in IE too ;)
But seriously, I have no idea what the use _can_ be.
--
Cheers,
Rob.
http://zooibaai.nl | http://digital-proof.org | http://chancecube.com
On 6/17/05, Cole Kuryakin - x7m [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So...will *{margin: 0 padding:0} in the HTML or Body declaration block zero
the margin and padding properties for all child elements in one go? I've
never seen the * used before.
Something you may also want to remember is the immense
On 9/28/05, Reeka Jean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But doesn't that depend on what you're using the bold tag for? There are
times, for instance - when you might want something to appear bold
visually, but it wouldn't need to be spoken louder/emphasized for a
screen reader, which - if I'm not
On 9/29/05, Irina Ahrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've found this to be an interesting idea and wondering what other members
think about it:
When bugs become patterns - A look at CSS Hacks:
http://spaces.msn.com/members/siteexperts/Blog/cns!1pNcL8JwTfkkjv4gg6LkVCpw!1805.entry#comment
On 10/5/05, Drake, Ted C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a[hreflang=sp]:after, a[hreflang=sp-*]:after {content:\A0(In Spanish);
font-size:90%; color:#666;}
Is there a way to use the wildcard inside a selector like this?
a[hreflang*=sp]::after { ... }
See:
On 10/5/05, Rob Mientjes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a[hreflang*=sp]::after { ... }
See: http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/CR-css3-selectors-2003/#selectors
Or a[hreflang^=sp]::after { ... } just to make sure it only selects
attributes starting with sp and nothing else.
On 10/5/05, Sarah Peeke (XERT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently stumbled across a site (sorry lost the reference now) that
made reference to the fact that an asterisk should be used inside an ALT
attribute (eg alt=*) when the image is only used for presentation
purposes.
Maybe it was
On 11/11/05, Tim Burgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In CSS, if I style my visited links so they are purple, as so...
a:visited { color: purple; }
...once the user has visited a particular link, from then on the color for
that link will not be purple.
Once the content for that visited
On 12/2/05, Jad Madi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have alpha launched itoot.net yesterday, please give me your
opinion, feedback, criticism
Looks good, no issues. That is to say, no issues with design and
performance. The about page could use some revisions. The quotation
marks aren't pretty (in
On 15/01/06, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The simplebits is very interesting. But it seems angled images in a list
that change aren't do-able using CSS without tables and some kind of image
replacement technique. A pic is worth a thousand words so I have made a link
to the mockup with a menu
On 10/02/06, liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And, and please do something similar for posting ettiquette. Just
looking at replies to this post there's two top posts which quote
your entire message without any trimming...
To stay off-topic here, that's the mail app's preference, probably.
On 09/02/06, Conyers, Dwayne, Mr [C] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I believe accessibility is an important design issue, is there legal
precedent for suing someone for poor design? It seems a bit like suing
Mickey Dees for spilling hot coffee in the lap...
Yes, but spilling hot coffee in the
On 02/03/06, Rob Mientjes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks good, everything works. Just not sure about the logo and left
chunk of site. Why is that below the header bar? Is that just Safari
or was it a conscious decision? Please do explain.
Of course it was conscious, but I still don't get
On 02/03/06, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was decided by the designer and management that they wanted the logo
on the homepage to be slightly larger and more prominent as a branding
exercise, but to then move it up to the header, out of the way for all
the sub pages.
Okay, fair
On 02/03/06, Kevin Futter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it should be *who* will grin gleefully for a start.
My apologies for that typo, but it shouldn't detract from the matter at hand.
-Rob.
N���.�Ȩ�X���+��i�� n�Z�֫v�+��h��y�m�쵩�j�l��.f���.�ץ�w�q(��b��(��,�)උazX����)��
On 03/03/06, Steve Olive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following coding errors:
Line 13 - Empty span tags
Intentional. It's a design decision, but the result isn't there yet. I
might even take it out when I'm done, but for now it's okay.
Line 60 - Unclosed img tag
Line 89 - Unclosed img tag
I
On 11/03/06, Jay Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anyone on this list knows of or has a clean and simple PHP/MySQL
image gallery script that is not full of nested tables and is easy to
modify with a basic php knowledge I need it for a project. Preferably
one that uses GD and not Imagemagik
46 matches
Mail list logo
