Re: [WSG] Nested Links?

I actually replied to this before with something along the lines of that James said, but I got an error so I'm just testing. On 4/24/05, Rowan Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I actually replied to this before with something along the lines of that James said, but I got an error so I'm just

Re: [WSG] BIIIIIIIG white space in Firefox not IE6

://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- Rowan Lewis (AKA. The Wolf

Re: [WSG] CSS Hack?

** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- Rowan Lewis (AKA. The Wolf

Re: [WSG] CSS Dropdown menu

** -- Rowan Lewis (AKA. The Wolf) ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **

Re: [WSG] CSS Dropdown menu

I'm just saying that its silly to reinvent things like :hover with javascript and DOM but its perfectly fine to write javascript to fix browser incompatability (IE doesn't support :hover on all elements). On 5/25/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rowan Lewis wrote: Nothing wrong

Re: [WSG] the mysteries of float - i seek enlightenment too

** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- Rowan Lewis (AKA. The Wolf

Re: [WSG] 100% table in 775px div w/overflow:auto

://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- Rowan Lewis (AKA. The Wolf) ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org

Re: [WSG] the mysteries of float - i seek enlightenment too

). Prabhath http://nidahas.com On 5/26/05, Rowan Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Interesting, Confirmed on Windows 2000, FFN 20050521. I'll have a play with your example and see if I can't work out the details. On 5/26/05, Ingo Chao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While I was zooming

Re: [WSG] Definition lists for comments in blogs

** -- Rowan Lewis (AKA. The Wolf) ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list

Re: [WSG] best way to approach markup of an address

** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- Rowan Lewis (AKA. The Wolf

Re: [WSG] 100% table in 775px div w/overflow:auto

** -- Rowan Lewis (AKA. The Wolf) ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **

Re: [WSG] Definition lists for comments in blogs

I think its one case of taking things a little too far... On 5/26/05, Lea de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 26 May 2005 19:16:48 +0930, Rowan Lewis wrote: Is the blockquote really needed? I mean, your not quoting from another source, your just displaying content from your website

Re: [WSG] Definition lists for comments in blogs

** -- Rowan Lewis (AKA. The Wolf) ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **

Re: [WSG] clearfixing

** -- Rowan Lewis (AKA. The Wolf) ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting

Re: [WSG] clearfixing

Well, you could use something like 'zoom : 1;' instead, even though it doesn't validate. Anyhow, if all else fails, I feel that the hack Dwain linked it is far worse than adding a little bit of markup and using 'clear : both;'. On 7/16/05, Ingo Chao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rowan Lewis schrieb

Re: [WSG] Reason for leaving

/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- Rowan Lewis (AKA. The Wolf) ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http

Re: [WSG] CSS 3 color module and deprecation of system colors

So they are wrong?Sure no browsers support the appearance property, or most of CSS3 for that matter, but thats fine as its not even complete yet. There really is no point in keeping the system colours if when CSS3 is ready all browsers will support the appearance property. On 9/4/05, Robin Berjon

[WSG] IE floating bug

to what caused this, can anyone confirm? Rowan Lewis (AKA. The Wolf) ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **

[WSG] Inline link padding in IE6

the inline link layout, but that doesn't work either. Any thoughts? -- Rowan Lewis (AKA. The Wolf) ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting

Re: [WSG] Inline link padding in IE6

Thanks George, for helping me give it layout. But the top/bottom padding was an important part of the desired effect :/ Any idea how to do it? On 11/18/05, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rowan Lewis wrote: I've come accross an interesting (and painful) bug in IE6, when you have