with IE 6
Regards
Dave...
- Original Message -
From: Lynette Smith
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 9:00 AM
Subject: [WSG] Client cannot view website
I hope this post is allowed. Just had a call from a client to say he cannot
see all of his
Hi , You might want to try this.
http://www.quidascript.com/index.php?main_page=product_infocPath=59products_id=125
I got this package it's cheap as chips and has hundreds of javascripts...
Regards Dave
- Original Message -
From: Laert Jansen
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
For Added Exposure For Your Site Please Visit The Links Below
http://www.inwithamillion.com
http://www.rankwithamillion.com
- Original Message -
From: Nick Tomczek
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Extra white line on the
Yes it's your image images/button.png that has the white line
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Nick Tomczek
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Extra white line on the top of my list
Michael,
Your image has the line
If you mean tab menu then look at these:
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/slidingdoors/
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/slidingdoors2/
I have used these and they are really cool
dave rayner
freshweb
www.freshweb.com.au
m. 0409 037 250
p. +61 2 89202344
f. +61 2 89203008
This message
I would really recommend going through the two articles, we were able to
customise the 'effect' a lot on a recent project, then use .NET to build
and add ids on the fly.
Instant flexible, dynamic CMSable tab menu
dave rayner
freshweb
www.freshweb.com.au
m. 0409 037 250
p. +61 2 89202344
f
I have yet to crack 10K for a css
Average around 6-8K (and we use CSS for nearly everything)
So unless I'm missing something, 30K seems really big.
dave rayner
freshweb
www.freshweb.com.au
m. 0409 037 250
p. +61 2 89202344
f. +61 2 89203008
? i didnt know i submitted a site, lol
do u mind if i ask which 1 it gave u?
thanks
dave
-- Original Message --
From: Chris Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:37:04 +0100
Dan,
Nice clean design, I like
oops, sorry, i didnt see where that signed me up for a discussion group
lol
-- Original Message --
From: Dave Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 03:49:00 -0400
? i didnt know i submitted a site, lol
do u mind if i
-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:14:52 -
From: Dave Lyons
then ur on some SERIOUS crack
i mean serious crack
no need for that...
dhtml will never be flash, never be supported like flash and
will never have the ease of use as flash, never have the
portability as flash
: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 23:39:52 +1100
Hi Dave,
From my experience Flash v's this/that arguments have been dragged up
the hill and down again so many times that most participants could
recite them backwards, plus they are likely to send people to their
unsubscribe button.
The point of my posting
a look at this site in ie5 for
mac and tell me/take a screenshot so I can see how horrid it looks?
The URL is http://www.wallpaper.com
Thanks for your help!
~Dave
http://www.edave.net
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
o show how disappointed i was. That'll teach
'em.
dave
rayner
freshwebwww.freshweb.com.aum. 0409 037
250
p. +61 2
89202344f. +61 2 89203008 This message is confidential, and may
contain proprietary or legally privileged information. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender
You have to edit your httpd.conf file to process files of the .html suffix.
Look for the line:
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php
make it:
AddType application/x-httpd-php .html .php
Easy!!
~Dave
Paul wrote:
I have a template that I have created and am creating all my pages from
that. I have
Its part of the spec I believe. An element is absolutly positioned
within it's containing element ( which I think has to be block level
for obvious reasons ). A basic example is that a single absolutly
positioned element ( say a div#example ) within the body tag is
positioned to the body tag which
off it and a protosite there for testing and
content. I also now have the stylesheet set so I can adjust the values
for future use and the client was impressed. I think in future I will
sketch out the wireframes separately and then apply it to the
XHTML/CSS to use as a protosite.
Dave O'Brien
On Mon
The navigation looks pretty good; started laying out a concept, still
a fair bit to do however and will have a go finishing off when I can
over the next few days.
Am shattered so enough said.
Dave
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:18:18 +1100, Peter Ottery
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so I've designed
it repaired by
a mechanic anyway, but at least with the later, maybe you've learnt
something.
In the end I gave up trying to teach every client and became a CMS
developer. :P
~Dave
Bert Doorn wrote:
I design sites to be standards compliant (usually XHTML1.0 Strict).
This is ~supposed~ to make
are defaulting to 'smaller' text in MSIE
rather than the default of 'medium'.
we have been able to resolve the issue for some of these users.
If anyone could offer any help or suggestions it would be greatly
appreciated.
- James Caller / Dave Barnett
//-
David
: propertyValue
}
White space is a very personal thing, I feel.
What you can read easiest depends entirely on what you're used to.
~Dave
Hugues Brunelle wrote:
Hi Charlie,
I know what you mean, I did many redesign stuff and find out that I wasn't
able to understand my own css file
specific division eg:
div#top h1 {
}
div#top p {
}
div#top ul {
}
div#top li {
}
It's a neat order, keeps the cascade flowing and easy to change the
visual layout of the page relatively quickly
--
Dave O'Brien
Venting my spleen at:
http://www.ventingspleen.co.uk
Also, regarding multiple stylesheets, I tend to put all the rules
relating to the homepage and structure of pages on the one main or
global stylesheet. I would then use a secondary stylesheet to hold any
page specific rules ( such as form styling, section specfic
navigations ), this helps reduce
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
--
Dave Lane == Egressive Ltd == [EMAIL PROTECTED] == +64 21 229 8147
+64 3 963 3733 = Linux: it just tastes better = no software patents
http://egressive.com we only use open standards: http://w3.org
Effusion
with it and rate it as very good), so I recommend a
test drive before committing - but then that's true of any of the
CMS/E-Commerce suggestions.
Cheers,
Dave
Paul Bennett wrote:
Hi all,
I just have to pitch in here. My dealings with Drupal have been less than
wonderful. I find it vague
, they put me right off (and,
needless to say, I don't go back).
Dave
Joyce Evans wrote:
I always thought it was a good idea to open links to other websites in a
separate window, so you don't lose the visitor. If the visitor clicks on a
link on your website and it does not open into a separate
Wow, that's very well said, especially your clarification of the
relationship dynamics between the website and the visitor.
Thanks,
Dave
Andrew Maben wrote:
If you go to the mall, would you be happier if every store you entered
assigned a staff member to accompany you so you don't forget
the form and position it as you require.
Hope that helps
Cheers
Dave
On 26/09/2007, Tom Livingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
OK, I hate form styling. It's my least favorite thing. I have started
using Eric Meyer's Reset style sheet. Does anyone have a favorite
resource for dealing
the form.
It won't always be necessary but is certainly useful if the label and
input can't be styled as you require without the extra markup.
Cheers
Dave
On 26/09/2007, Tom Livingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
Thanks a lot for this. It's really simple and I don't mind the extra
span
Mike, This is exactly the reason why I include the br at the end of
the labels so that the form still displays nicely without the styles
applied.
I suppose a better case could be made for removing the display: block;
from the labels in this situation but would be needed if for example
you wanted
Alternatively you could introduce and extra div and apply padding/margin
to create the effect you need. If the background outside the container is a
plain colour you could always apply a border-top or 120px to make it appear
as you want.
The first will definitely work for your situation whilst
Hi,
Are these what you're after?
http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/
http://www.section508.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContentID=12
Thanks
Dave
On 03/10/2007, Tom Livingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi listers,
Does anyone have a reference (link) to a site that actually spells out
what
attributes, using semantic HTML, ensuring that JavaScript
isn't used for critical functionality etc shouldn't be nice to have's
for the client, they should be built in as standard by any reputable
web designer.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dave Woods
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk
of development that
they now need to consider accessibility.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dave Woods
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 08/10/2007, Steve Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The cost of adding accessibility should really be zero.
Statements like
.
Hope that helps.
Dave
- - - - - - - - - -
Dave Woods
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk
On 23/10/2007, Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
iam trying to understand how a page that have 1 or 2 javascript in
href could pass in level A of WCAG 1.
it have a noscript but that doesnt prove
Hi Dean,
Not sure what these two styles are actually doing but it looks like
they're the cause within your menu.css
#p7TBMsub03 { padding: 0 0 0 150px; }
#p7TBMsub04 { padding: 0 0 0 210px; }
Removing them seems to fix the problem with no adverse effect.
Cheers
Dave
- - - - - - - - - -
Dave
altogether.
Hope that helps.
- - - - - - - - - -
Dave Woods
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk
On 24/10/2007, Dave Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dean,
Not sure what these two styles are actually doing but it looks like
they're the cause within your menu.css
#p7TBMsub03 { padding: 0 0 0 150px
Hi Simon,
If you have an image for purely presentational purposes then you can
use a blank alt attribute
alt=
However, if it's purely for presentational purposes then you should
really apply it using CSS as a background image ;o)
Thanks
Dave
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk
On 26/10/2007, Simon
would suggest running it through http://validator.w3.org as you've got
a few errors (you're using an XHTML doctype so don't forget to close
img tags as well as escaping ampersands). ;o)
Hope that helps.
Dave
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk
On 26/10/2007, Simon Cockayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again
are much more important once you've
performed these initial tests.
Hope they help though.
Dave
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk
On 26/10/2007, Simon Cockayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am on a mission to get the microsite that I built for my wife
http://phd.london.edu/ygrushkacockayne
problems but once the page is online I
tend to find it works alright.
On 26/10/2007, Simon Cockayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dave,
First off, thanks for the feedback.
I do have the Firefox Web Developer tool bar...for some reason the
toolsvalidate local accessibility seems to hang
not neccesarily
bad for search engines but can be bad for accessibility as screen
readers will ignore it so you'd be better off using negative text
indent or negative absolute positioning.
It depends on what situation you're using it for but yes it can be bad
if used wrongly.
Thanks
Dave
to be breaking their terms of use.
If display: none; is being used for a legitimate purpose then I
wouldn't worry about it but as I mentioned earlier, it can have a
negative impact on accessibility so as with most things, it depends
how and why you're using this method.
Thanks
Dave
be applied to
container div :o)
Thanks
Dave
- - - - - - - - - -
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk
On 31/10/2007, Mike at Green-Beast.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can offer this simple method:
http://mikecherim.com/experiments/css_smart_corners.php
I prefer spans over divs because divs do have
of using a text browser read this content?
Hope that helps.
Dave
- - - - - - - - - -
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk
On 01/11/2007, Likely, James A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am pretty new to this group but have been seeing all of the useful emails
that have been sent over the past
sizes
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/?p=79
Other than that though, it's a relatively simple layout so should only
really need a few div containers and then the relevant heading's
applied along with paragraphs of text.
Hope that helps.
Cheers
Dave
- - - - - - - - - -
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk
Vanilla is definitely the most standards compliant forum software I've seen.
If you wanted to go down the social networking/bookmarking site route then
there's some software called pligg which I believe the likes of digg and
sphinn use.
http://www.pligg.com/
On 09/11/2007, Rahul Gonsalves
and
bad practice tutorials online.
http://www.sitepoint.com/books/javascript1/?SID=8a6e5ef267535b16d9b4f5c5b54a008d
Hope that helps.
Dave
- - - - - - - - - -
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk
On 13/11/2007, Kevin Lennon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob Mason wrote:
Hi guys,
Am comfortable with HTML/CSS
content that is wider than the left column.
Hope that helps.
Dave
- - - - - - - - - -
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk
On 14/11/2007, Simon Cockayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am not the owner of http://www.shield.on.ca/Blog/index.php ...
But...I am puzzled as to why the navigation sidebar
/
There's also plenty of colour combination websites about, only have this one
in my bookmarks though...
http://www.colorcombos.com/
Hope that helps.
Dave
- - - - -
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk
On 14/12/2007, Michael Horowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know a good online resource or book
Hi,
Personally, I'd use heading's for the questions and paragraphs for the
answers but that's down to my own preference and have seen it done a variety
of ways.
Cheers
Dave
- - - - - - - -
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk
On 17/01/2008, Mike at Green-Beast.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I completely agree with most of the comments so far. Why create
functionality that is simply replicating the functionality of a browser?
There was an article on text resizing a while ago that I'm sure most people
are already aware of by Roger Johansson...
The first question I'd ask is why not just use check boxes instead of trying
to replicate them? If you mark them up correctly then there's really no
better accessible method than using the correct element as it was meant.
If you go down this route then you're likely to create all kinds of
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Dave Woods
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 23, 2008 8:59 AM
*To:* wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
*Subject:* Re: [WSG] Background images versus image
The first question I'd ask is why not just use check boxes instead of
trying to replicate them? If you mark
I just like to ask if it might be possible to turn off this version
freezing thing in IE8, maybe with some markup or something. I agree
with Drew Mclellan when he said in his blog that old browsers must die.
Using an HTML5 doctype will remove the need to include the meta tag. Using
edge within
A better approach would be to switch to a more standards compliant browser
like Firefox/Opera or Safari ;o)
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/
http://www.opera.com/
http://www.apple.com/safari/ (still appears to be in beta for windows
though).
If you're a web developer/designer, you should
Also, think about the important factors first when creating a website. Build
something that satisfies the requirements, provides the function/content
required, is accessible, usable and uses the latest web standards and if the
site falls into the web2.0 category then so be it, if not then really
: 216px; on the anchor will do the same job as the zoom) but
there's various methods of solving the haslayout issue.
Cheers
Dave
- - - - -
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk
On 14/02/2008, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Behalf Of Andrew WC Brown
Here's an image to the problem
http
...
I know there's a lot of people that don't like conditional comments,
but it can save A LOT of time.
Best Regards,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Dave Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Andrew,
As Thierry has pointed out, Zoom will fix this issue but you may want to
have a read
Looks like the double margin bug.
Try changing this...
#navMain ul li a
{ margin:43px 35px 0 0;
border:1px solid black;
float:right; display:block;
}
to this
#navMain ul li a
{ margin:43px 35px 0 0;
border:1px solid black;
float:right; display:inline;
}
Hope that helps.
On 15/02/2008, kevin
I'm sure John won't mind me posting a link to his article on the subject...
http://www.tyssendesign.com.au/articles/css/legends-of-style/
Hope that helps.
2008/2/28 Cole Kuryakin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello All -
I've already spent a lot of time researching this and - from the threads
I've
nested elements and named
classes/ID's sensibly then you shouldn't really need to use comments anyway.
Cheers
Dave
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk
On 03/04/2008, Rob Enslin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've recently built a website trying to move towards more
standards-compliant code. After the delight
Go for the first option...
h2section title/h2
ul
liapage name 1/a/li
liapage name 2/a/li
...
/ul
Google won't give anymore weight as it'll simply dilute the weight of all
your h3 tags so only use them where they're relavant and where they are
actually heading up contnet.
I'd always advise
Personally, I'd use overflow on the container to clear the float's and then
add width: 100%; to apply layout for IE7 and below.
div#innerContainer ul{margin: 0; padding: 0;* width: 100%; overflow: hidden;
*}
Hope that helps.
Dave
- - - - -
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk
2008/4/17 Frederick
it again
when the final release of IE8 is made available.
If you're already getting a significant number of IE8 users (which is
probably unlikely) then do as Rahul suggests and use the meta tag to force
IE7 rendering mode.
Hope that helps?
Dave
--
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk
2008/4/29 Rahul
and reporting bugs back to Microsoft but it
shouldn't be used for the production of websites just yet.
Thanks
Dave
- - - - -
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk
2008/4/29 James Jeffery [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ha Ha, i like name inferior explorer. Maybe someone should set up the
domain name and allow people
I've downloaded Firebug 1.1 Beta and it seems to work fine with Firefox 3
http://getfirebug.com/releases/
Hope that helps.
- - - - -
http://www.dave-woods.co.uk
2008/6/18 kate [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I hear about so many goodies on my lists I tried to dl Firebug (if our
people like it its got
unnecessary - sort of like a www on the front of a web URL is
(or should be).
Dave
Rob Enslin wrote:
Hi peeps,
I recently started noticing that our CMS system generated .htm pages
where previously the system produced .html pages. I questioned the
support staff and was told that the W3C deemed
I'm assuming most of the hacks are for IE? Why not just conditionally
include them, i.e. unless the validator obeys IE policies, it won't even
see the IE-specifi CSS.
Dave
Fuji kusaka wrote:
Hi anyone can help me out with validating my css?...
I cant pass validation because of some css
Hello fellow members of the web standards group:
I'm a faculty member at Kent State University in Kent, Ohio in the US.
My colleague, Sanda Katila, and I are conducting research on the extent to
which web standards are being adopted into the design and development of web
sites, and we would very
.
Hope that helps you.
Kind regards,
Dave
James O'Neill wrote:
Susan,
That give me an idea. I am just starting to learn PHP and Drupal so
making changes on my own will be fun. I am looking forward to tacking some.
Thanks,
Jim
I am currently working on a large Drupal project
be wrapped into the
next release. That way, you don't have to maintain the code yourself,
and you won't have problems with upgrades.
It's cool how open source works.
Cheers,
Dave
Susan Grossman wrote:
Our core business is building sites with Drupal. We focus on XHTML 1.0
strict
be wrapped into the
next release. That way, you don't have to maintain the code yourself,
and you won't have problems with upgrades.
It's cool how open source works.
Cheers,
Dave
Susan Grossman wrote:
Our core business is building sites with Drupal. We focus on XHTML 1.0
strict
indespensible for learning the drupal way of doing things.
Cheers,
Dave
Susan Grossman wrote:
Our core business is building sites with Drupal. We focus on XHTML 1.0
strict compliance and are striving towards full adherence of the New
Zealand e-government web guidelines which cover
Hello Diego,
I recommend you check out S5:
http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2004/10/18/ssup5sup-10/
I've used them on quite a few occasions and they work very well so long
as you're happy playing with HTML markup.
Cheers,
Dave
PS I suggest turning off email receipts on emails to mailing
when you want to start a new discussion.
Cheers
Dave
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 16:32 +1100, Rae Buerckner wrote:
PDF is an ISO standard and has been for some months,
snip /
Whoops missed that bit of news - thanks for the update
***
List Guidelines:
of technologies rather
than yours, my advice is to get a new customer. That sort of customer
will make your life miserable and cost you money in the long run.
Cheers,
Dave
Mark Harris wrote:
Joe Ortenzi wrote:
Contribute is not about content management as much as it is about
allowing an in-house
Hello Mark,
Mark Harris wrote:
Dave, the business decision is not that of the web designer. While web
design may be his business, it's not the business of his client.
If it's not the decision of the web developer, then I don't expect that
web developer to be around for long.
As a web
mail systems.
Regards,
Dave
Joe Ortenzi wrote:
this would be a useful and important addition to the mailing guidelines
I would have to say, yes.
Joe
On 06/11/2008, at 8:47 AM, Brett Patterson wrote:
Oh. I have always just set mine up to not send out for specific e-mail
addresses
-underwear-showing/
I don't know if anyone else picked this up, but link #1 has the problem
described in link #2. I wonder if the positioning in the list was
intentional :)
Cheers
Dave
***
List Guidelines: http
for the service so if they get booted they are the ones
liable for any charges.
If your client doesn't understand the implications of the request, then
you are probably best off without them.
Cheers
Dave
Luke
Graphics Web Designing, LLC wrote:
I am sorry to ask this question but I am very curious
validate, and they all have their underwear showing
[1], so I suspect you are looking in the wrong place for partners.
In future please keep your spam to yourself.
Cheers
Dave
[1]
http://www.zeldman.com/2008/11/07/is-your-websites-underwear-showing
to list them? Styles or Scripts
first?
Yahoo's performance best practice guide recommends styles in the head
and scripts as the last thing before the /body in a document. See
http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#css_top for more info.
Cheers
Dave
-apps (wrapped in suitable HTML navigation, etc.) and some nice
branding-related effects... but generally, Flash is overused when HTML +
CSS with a sprinkling of Javascript could do the job better and in
accordance with web standards.
Regards,
Dave
Elizabeth Spiegel wrote:
Hi Kate
You
as a teaching tool, is dead. Yep, poked it
with a stick. Dead. :)
Cheers,
Dave
Bruce wrote:
Andrew November 24, 2008 10:59 AM
On Nov 24, 2008, at 10:47 AM, Kate wrote:
Wow! You hand code
For now, and I think, the foreseeable future, this is still the only
way available if you want to get
or are a really
slow typist (although I can't recommend enough taking the time to learn
how to touch type - you'll never regret it)... :)
Dave
--
Dave Lane = Egressive Ltd = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = m: +64 21 229 8147
p: +64 3 9633733 = Linux: it just tastes better = nosoftwarepatents
http://egressive.com
you can make your views
known. Keep in mind, only emailing the minister and signing an online
opinion will register to marks in the against column.
Cheers
Dave who should finish his letter writing campaign
Nedlud.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 9:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am hoping
Dave
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 23:11 -0600, Brett Patterson wrote:
What Dave?
I was simply illustrating how to make text blink in a standards
compliant way. You never know someone might find such information
useful one day. The example I provided would allow them to avoid using
the ugly non standard
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 13:07 +, Stuart Foulstone wrote:
Blinking text is against standards in itself, so how can you do it in a
standards compliant way?
Using the sample I posted - see below. That validates.
Cheers
Dave
On Fri, November 28, 2008 10:45 am, Dave Hall wrote
).
Cheers
Dave
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
Hi all,
Just got my latest project to validate XHTML Strict, and just wanted any
helpful criticism and also to see if any problems with any Browsers and
Operating Systems .
http://www.clock-this.co.uk/
Thanks in advance..
Dave
Thanks, I will try to impliment your suggestions I am just getting out of
the MSFrontpage stage and working with divs instead of tables. so I fully
respect your views.
BTW the flash animation is only supposed to load then stop... as requested
by client..
- Original Message -
From:
are not very representative of the
general intarwebs user base.
Cheers
Dave
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh
I found problems with your [IF] End Tags I.E Should be:
!--[if gte mso 9]
![endif]--
Not:
!--[if gte mso 9]
!--[endif]--
This was making your whole page hidden from Internet Explorer
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Kristine Cummins
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent
Just to clarify some of your IF comments closed incorrectly but your las one
closed correctly, so Internet Explorer will Hide the content.
So just find the closing if comments and correct them.
- Original Message -
From: Dave Westell
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Friday
dude!
You not on a mac? See you next week!
Dave Citect Turner
From: Levell Rampono lev...@pro-perspective.com
Sent: 26 February 2009 15:53
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Safari Beta 4
Handling it very, very well and I'm
running
Hi Marvin,
You have missing image files,
http://startrekcafe.alacorncomputer.com/images/fruit_banana.jpg
http://startrekcafe.alacorncomputer.com/images/m_a_essam_1114164_16526150.jpg
Also cannot see any rollover effects
Regards...
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Marvin Hunkin
Hi Marvin,
OK I now see you are using mouseover () mouseOut() effects...
Your .js script is missing .
http://www.alacorncomputer.com/javascript/fruit.js
Also your page does not validate, you have one too many closing divides
/div after #nav1
Dave...
- Original Message -
From
the idea of
composing content in the actual TinyMCE interface totally absurd, which
doesn't make much sense to me...)./rant
Regards,
Dave
On 27/02/10 07:32, Kepler Gelotte wrote:
Just spent a day with FCKEditor only to find that there appears to be
no way to have site CSS appear in the Style
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
