However a point to note is that this also activates the opera small
screen rendering mode which does mean that this view is really only
useful for simulating opera browser. Really any simulator you get will
just be an apporximation... perhaps the best way would be to try and
find people with va
I gotta say that with the tools available these days anyone who prefers
to use a plain text editor must be somewhat masochistic...
;-) of course that is just my wee opinion.
I use dreamweaver MX 2004 for my front end coding and it is great. The
days of dreamweaver mangling the code you had carefu
It is probably worth mentioning that not all user agents will represent
your title in the same way (if at all), safari f'rinstance puts the
title text in the status bar rather than a tooltip...
I do like patrick's visual indicator idea, that dotted line is fast
becoming an accepted method for ma
ok, my bad...
I'm outa the office at the mo' . My version of safari is 1.0 and I
remember that effect, I'll have to test later
s
Sage Olson wrote:
On Jul 14, 2004, at 4:46 PM, scott parsons wrote:
It is probably worth mentioning that not all user agents will
represent your title
personally I think you should use an embed tag as provided by macromedia
when you publish the .swf...
but since you seem to be using hixie's conditionals...
here is the original article from hixie
http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1081798064&count=1
Gavin Cooney wrote:
Hi All,
I have a page with a flash
ooops, hit send too soon...
I was going to go on to say that the only obvious differences were your
lack of width and height attributes... you could try putting them back in...
s
scott parsons wrote:
personally I think you should use an embed tag as provided by
macromedia when you publish the
27;t really changed since the days of Aftershock - pg
175 of the Flash 3 manual! (thems were the days).
Cheers
James
scott parsons wrote:
personally I think you should use an embed tag as provided by
macromedia when you publish the .swf...
but since you seem to be using hixie's condit
While in some countries it imay be considered illegal to even discuss
prices for services, unless laws have changed in the last few years it
is not illegal in Australia or the EU. Actual price fixing may be, but
professionals discussing how to work out what to charge and what to
charge for is n
We've got a site going live next tuesday, or possibly wednesday if copy
doesn't get approved.
This site we have been working on for a massive 4 days, including
intergration with reasonably complex .net backend, and several flash
components.
Out of some 25 pages there are maybe 9 unique templates
While I think this approach has a real basis for fairly simple sites,
once you start getting into more complex sites, and web applications the
time taken to step back and plan is usually well worthwhile.
This is where I like to have good clear wireframes which have been
thought out clearly to c
you can but only in IE due to IE having some weirdness occuring in the
way they layout the page.
BUT
if you style the columns using the IE method, and style the third td
(td+td+td etc) which will be understood by most modern browsers you
should be able to get the column styled for everybody.
pe
Hey there, so...
does anyone have any experience with chtml and in particular imode?
We are currently looking into what we need to do to make a site we have
made work well on imode...
The site is valid xhtml 1.0 and I am wondering what will happen if we
just let the imoders use that site. Which w
Hi there...
We have recently put out a new site, it was built by my junior so is a
little rougher than I'd like in places. But I think she did a great job
all in all. Especially since the client was a pain and the time was oh
so tight!
anyway, tell us what you think
http://www.rachelandjen.telst
I would also add
D. Longevity of design - if the site is only going to be live for 9
weeks you can be pretty sure that future browsers will not have time to
choke on any hacks.
E. Tight design timelines - If your boss comes to you on wednesday
telling you that this new site needs to be delivere
there is provision for this in css 2
but I don't know if it is supported anywhere, except maybe opera
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/generate.html
s
Amit Karmakar wrote:
People, any good pointers on legal numbering using 's in xhtml
I am looking for 3 levels of nesting
as in:
1.0
1.1
1.1.1
TIA
Maybe I'm misunderstanding you but I think it is a terrible idea to have
multiple content streams. This can and often does lead to multiple
headaches...
Personally I favour having one content stream, but possibly multiple
style/display streams. These could be assigned via server controls, or
by
um, lindsay you must be half asleep today...
put the hover on an a tag
a:hover {
color: #00;
background: #66;
}
and it works fine in the pita browser, else v cute
s
Lindsay Evans wrote:
Only tested in FB 0.6.1, IE 6 on XP (I'm lazy today).
Suggestions welcome.
Oh, a
tis a float issue, put
clear:both;
in the h2 definition, or add some other device to clear the dl
however there is also some other interesting stuff going on with the
collapsing top margin of the h2, and also where the border of the dl
would seem to indicate it is.
s
Mark Stanton wrote:
Hey ev
Well to me those css errors just look like the kind of last minute thing
that we all know can easily sneak through
As for the html... well some of that stuff will make it easier for legacy
browsers to understand and not feck up the site. But if this was the reason
for their inclusion it rather beg
which OS?
your request makes sense...
but most OSs have different defaults for form elements
s
Taco Fleur wrote:
What I meant was, how to recreate the default look of the input field. For example take a input field and do not apply any CSS to it, that it the look I want to recreate exactly the sa
too many divs!
text text text ...
a p{width:200px;margin-left:120px;}
a img{float:left}
just keep it simple, and add a descendent selector if this is just for
one section of your page