*I have started a new thread for this discussion, as not to hijack the
thread on skip links.*
Thanks for the reply Steve. As I said, it is another school of thought (not
necessarily my own). I wouldn’t use content first source ordering for
commercial implementations as the overhead of relocating
An interesting discussion...
Back in 2006, Roger Hudson, Lisa Miller and I conducted testing on three
aspects associated with screen reader use (skip links, source order and
structural lables).
The findings regarding source order:
t appears that when visiting a web page, most, if not all,
...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Russ Weakley
Sent: 05 June 2012 23:53
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Source order of content / navigation
An interesting discussion...
Back in 2006, Roger Hudson, Lisa Miller and I conducted testing on three
aspects associated with screen
ooops. Reference:
http://usability.com.au/resources/source-order.cfm#conclusion
t appears that when visiting a web page, most, if not all, screen reader
users expect at least the main site navigation to be presented before the
content of the page. There appears to be little evidence to