RE: [WSG] Problem Validating CSS

2004-02-10 Thread Peter Firminger
Hi Chris, You need to escape any with amp;(even in URL query strings). Links to the relevant files/validator results would help so we could see the code. P From: Chris Stratford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 1:01 PMTo: Web Standards

RE: [WSG] Problem Validating CSS

2004-02-10 Thread Peter Firminger
The other suggestion is to validate the CSS file(s) separately at http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator-uri.htmlrather than parsing the xhtml for the linked files. P I have an interesting problem here...i try and validate the CSS of my XHTML website...and the CSS page says i

RE: [WSG] Problem Validating CSS

2004-02-10 Thread Peter Firminger
It's good practice to do it for (amp;) and (quot;) in the text all the time (HTML or XHTML). Also be aware of em-dashes, en-dashes, epsilons (...) and the curly varieties of and ' (which I hate and always strip back to the plain text version). If it's your own blog software, make sure to

RE: [WSG] Problem Validating CSS

2004-02-10 Thread Taco Fleur
me and I will learn -Original Message- From: Peter Firminger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2004 1:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [WSG] Problem Validating CSS It's good practice to do it for (amp;) and (quot;) in the text all the time (HTML or XHTML

Re: [WSG] Problem Validating CSS

2004-02-10 Thread James Ellis
Peter Firminger wrote: Sorry, I don't do PHP. Someone else may have a PHP solution for you. P I think I did a pretty long post a while back on this subject - probably good to search for it in the archive. Anyway, the PHP way to do the CF in Peter's example is: $newString =

Re: [WSG] Problem Validating CSS

2004-02-10 Thread Universal Head
I beg of you, don't discard the 'curly varieties' - they are the typographical correct apostrophes. The non-curly versions are an ugly pox on mankind and should only be used to delineate feet and inches. Peter On 11/02/2004, at 2:30 PM, Peter Firminger wrote: Also be aware of em-dashes,

Re: [WSG] Problem Validating CSS

2004-02-10 Thread Chris Stratford
Thats great thanks! :) There are a whole bunch of PHP tags available to use... Thanks for that tho :) Your advice has helped me a lot :D cheers Pete! Chris Stratford [EMAIL PROTECTED] Http://www.neester.com Peter Firminger wrote: It's good practice to do it for (amp;) and " (quot;)

Re: [WSG] Problem Validating CSS

2004-02-10 Thread Justin French
On Wednesday, February 11, 2004, at 02:30 PM, Peter Firminger wrote: Also be aware of em-dashes, en-dashes, epsilons (...) and the curly varieties of and ' (which I hate and always strip back to the plain text version). I've found that the entities mdash; and ndash; don't work in older

RE: [WSG] Problem Validating CSS

2004-02-10 Thread Peter Firminger
I've found that the entities mdash; and ndash; don't work in older browsers (like NN4), so best use the numeric entities: em-dash = #8212; en-dash = #8211; I agree entirely Justin. Sorry I didn't point that out. elispes (not epsilons) = #8230; Oops,

Re: [WSG] Problem Validating CSS

2004-02-10 Thread Universal Head
Naw, I can live with the three dot thing ;) P But I'd rather stick with 3 dots (...) as I have seen this one break badly in a search result or text browser or something, can't remember where now. May just be a stubborn bad habit. Sorry if that worries Peter (UH) as well. x-tad-bigger