RE: [WSG] a better tsolution than oveflow:auto for Mozilla?

2005-09-27 Thread Drake, Ted C.
Hi Bruce Try floating the content div instead. I've often found this to be the easiest fix. A floated parent will contain its floated children. I've been writing a document for my fellow programmers about nested lists and if write parent/child one more time I think I'm going to change

Re: [WSG] a better tsolution than oveflow:auto for Mozilla?

2005-09-27 Thread Bruce Gilbert
Thanks Ted, not sure I am understanding you correctly, though. Say you have a parent div you would to extend the length of your content, and within that parent div you have a div at the top that you want to not float, but fit the width of the parent, and below the top child div, you have two more

RE: [WSG] a better tsolution than oveflow:auto for Mozilla?

2005-09-27 Thread Drake, Ted C.
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Gilbert Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 1:55 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] a better tsolution than oveflow:auto for Mozilla? Thanks Ted, not sure I am understanding you correctly, though. Say you have a parent di

Re: [WSG] a better tsolution than oveflow:auto for Mozilla?

2005-09-27 Thread Bruce Gilbert
Of Bruce GilbertSent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 1:55 PMTo: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: Re: [WSG] a better tsolution than oveflow:auto for Mozilla? Thanks Ted, not sure I am understanding you correctly, though. Say you have a parent div you would to extend the length of your content

RE: [WSG] a better tsolution than oveflow:auto for Mozilla?

2005-09-27 Thread Drake, Ted C.
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Gilbert Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 2:40 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] a better tsolution than oveflow:auto for Mozilla? that's more or less what I am doing, but take a look at this page in FF http