http://www.csszengarden.com/
http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/complexspiral/demo.html
http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/index.html
--
Neerav Bhatt
http://www.bhatt.id.au
Web Development IT consultancy
Mobile: +61 (0)403 8000 27
http://www.bhatt.id.au/blog/ - Ramblings Thoughts
: Re: [WSG] ultimate noob question is table-less layout meaning literally?
http://www.csszengarden.com/
http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/complexspiral/demo.html
http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/index.html
--
Neerav Bhatt
http://www.bhatt.id.au
Web Development IT consultancy
Hi, Duncan.
All the sites I design are based on CSS-driven layouts; however, I still use
tables for presenting tabulated data (naturally). Even the most hardcore CSS
junkie will admit that there are some table-based layouts that cannot be
replicated using just CSS. The usual way to get around
Duncan,
You do need to get your head around this or you remain trapped in the
old mindset, which mixes content and appearance.
A table, unless it holds tabular data, has no semantic meaning.
Especially if you are using nested components. You are including it in
your HTML only for the purpose
At 21:24 16/08/2004 +1000, you wrote:
http://www.csszengarden.com/
much inspiration here. thanks Neerav. It's exactly what i needed.
and thanks to everyone elses comments. Feel a lot more confident about it now.
Duncan
**
The discussion list
What about http://www.sitepoint.com ?
That's as complicated a structure as any I've seen, and almost
completely table-less.
That's a particularly good example, because it uses no tables to lay
out the page, but right at the bottom where they've got a list of
data, best displayed using rows and
Table-less just means tables aren't used for layout. When used to
contain tabular data, that's not layout, that's containing data that
SHOULD be in a table.
JMHO.
Leslie Riggs
What about http://www.sitepoint.com ?
That's as complicated a structure as any I've seen, and almost
completely
