Re: [WSG] Duplicate buttons

2004-08-29 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Unfortunately browser like lynx ignore tabindices, and some older 
versions of Mozilla get it wrong and make it impossible to tab to 
anything which doesn't have a tabindex as soon as you use elements with 
tabindex.
Moreover, especially on long forms, even if you could rely on tabindex, 
you'd start pulling your hairs out having to add tabindices to every 
single form element (as otherwise the browser will still cycle through 
the ones with a tabindex, no matter how high/low you set it, before 
tabbing through the non-tabindexed elements).
So overall, I still don't think that's a viable solution.  Why not go 
for skip to the end of the form type links (they can even be graphical 
for sighted users)? Seems to me these would be the least bothersome, and 
not about to break even in older browsers...

Patrick
Mordechai Peller wrote:
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
well, imagine the user has a screenreader or braille display and is 
tabbing through the form . they end up on the first submit button, and 
have no way of knowing that there's more after that button, so they 
submit it at the first intermediate step...not good.

That's not a problem. All you need to do is make sure the tab indexes 
are higher than than the last element. Also, iirc, setting the tab index 
to -1 will make it unaccessible by tabbing; just make sure you don't do 
that to the last one.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


--
_
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Duplicate buttons

2004-08-29 Thread Steven . Faulkner

I have found that having multiple submit buttons can cause problems for
screen reader users.
A possible  solution is to place the both submit buttons at the bottom of
the form (within the code) and use CSS to position one of the buttons in
the middle/or wherever (visually)  of the form. As screenreaders read the
page as it is written in the code (ignoring css positioning) a screen
reader user will not encounter the submit button(s) until the end of the
form.





with regards

Steven Faulkner
Web Accessibility Consultant
National Information  Library Service (NILS)
454 Glenferrie Road
Kooyong Victoria 3144
Phone: (613) 9864 9281
Fax: (613) 9864 9210
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

National Information Library Service
A subsidiary of RBS.RVIB.VAF Ltd.


   
 
  Taco Fleur 
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
  
  net.au  cc: 
 
  Sent by: Subject:  [WSG] Duplicate buttons   
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  group.org
 
   
 
   
 
  27/08/2004 08:31 
 
  PM   
 
  Please respond to
 
  wsg  
 
   
 
   
 




I have been putting duplicate buttons on one form when its a long form, so
the user does not have to scroll.
I have been told its not good for accessibility, what's the go?

Taco Fleur

Tell me and I will forget
Show me and I will remember
Teach me and I will learn





**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Duplicate buttons

2004-08-28 Thread Mordechai Peller
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
well, imagine the user has a screenreader or braille display and is 
tabbing through the form . they end up on the first submit button, and 
have no way of knowing that there's more after that button, so they 
submit it at the first intermediate step...not good.
That's not a problem. All you need to do is make sure the tab indexes 
are higher than than the last element. Also, iirc, setting the tab index 
to -1 will make it unaccessible by tabbing; just make sure you don't do 
that to the last one.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Duplicate buttons

2004-08-27 Thread Mordechai Peller
Taco Fleur wrote:
I have been putting duplicate buttons on one form when its a long 
form, so the user does not have to scroll.
I have been told its not good for accessibility, what's the go?
While the duplication does reduce accessibility/usability in some ways, 
but it also adds in others. IMO, there is a net gain.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Duplicate buttons

2004-08-27 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
well, imagine the user has a screenreader or braille display and is 
tabbing through the form . they end up on the first submit button, and 
have no way of knowing that there's more after that button, so they 
submit it at the first intermediate step...not good.
why not split up the form over multiple screens instead (or even better, 
offer two options: multi-page or one single long form - with only one 
submit button at the end). additionally, you could provide an access key 
for the submit button, enabling keyboard users to quickly skip to the 
end and submit. and another thought: skip links to go to the end of the 
form (which benefit all users, and do pretty much what you're aiming to do).
but i'd definitely recommend not having intermediate buttons...

Patrick H. Lauke
Taco Fleur wrote:
I have been putting duplicate buttons on one form when its a long form, 
so the user does not have to scroll.
I have been told its not good for accessibility, what's the go?
 
*Taco Fleur*

Tell me and I will forget
Show me and I will remember
Teach me and I will learn
 
--
_
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**