Re: [WSG] Keeping a table ordered

[Patrick H. Lauke]

Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote:

CANBERRA        ABC Company
                Email
                
SYDNEY          XYZ Company
                Address
                Ph
                Email


<table>

<thead>
<tr>
<th>Location</th>
<th>Company details</th>
</tr>
</thead>

<tbody>

<tr>
<td scope="row">Canberra</td>
<td>ABC Company<br />Email</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td scope="row">Sydney</td>
<td>XYZ Company<br />Address<br />Ph<br />Email</td>
</tr>

...

</tbody>

<table>



I guess, at first glance this is best designed using a table. However,
in order to keep the locations in alphabetical order as new locations
are added, it gets a bit messy having to moving all the <td>s around.

Not that messy if you keep the above simple structure (and no, I'm not 
getting into an argument as to whether or not <br /> is appropriate in 
an address context).

P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
__________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__________________________________________________________
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__________________________________________________________
******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************