Re: [WSG] Safari problems

2005-11-09 Thread Adam Morris
Here are the screen shots of the weirdness that is Safari 1. On
mouseover too, the flower persists in displaying...
http://www.janelehrer.co.uk/safarishots.html
http://www.megustalatelevision.com/uwish

Any ideas would be greatly appreciated
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Safari problems

2005-11-08 Thread Adam Morris
Thanks, Jan. I am going to take a screen shot today of the problem and
I'll post a link to it later. It's the image of the flower that is
misaligned on the nav list.

On 07/11/05, Jan Brasna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On my version of Safari (1.3)

 The 1.3 branch is fairly OK, it implemented all the bugfixes and
 features that are present in 2.x, but the odler one misbehave seriously.

 My EUR 0.02 - try to play with

 #navigation li {
   background-position: 0.5em;
 }

 a bit, like: 5px 5px or 20% 20% to see whether it works or not. I'd say
 it'd be enough to use something like 0.5em 0 or similar.

 --
 Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Safari problems

2005-11-07 Thread Tom Livingston
I'm having trouble recalling the what-version-of-Safari-runs-on what- 
version-of-Mac OS X listing, but is it possible to have them upgrade  
Safari to the highest possible that they can run (if they all ready  
haven't, that is)? I just know that Safari 1 was buggy as all get  
out. Few people at the time cared about it because of that, and I am  
sure many still ignore it.


Just a thought. I have never tried to code for it.

On Nov 5, 2005, at 2:05 AM, Adam Morris wrote:

The guys who I've done the site for, use this browser so it would be
nice for it to behave.
This is the flowered list:
http://www.megustalatelevision.com/uwish/



-
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Safari problems

2005-11-07 Thread Adam Morris
Ah, that's brilliant to know, Tom, that it's a dodgy browser and not
my ignorance!
They seem to be running the first incarnation of OSX so I imagine it's
the first Safari release too.
It would be nice to know exactly what bug is causing the problem though...



On 07/11/05, Tom Livingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm having trouble recalling the what-version-of-Safari-runs-on what-
 version-of-Mac OS X listing, but is it possible to have them upgrade
 Safari to the highest possible that they can run (if they all ready
 haven't, that is)? I just know that Safari 1 was buggy as all get
 out. Few people at the time cared about it because of that, and I am
 sure many still ignore it.

 Just a thought. I have never tried to code for it.

 On Nov 5, 2005, at 2:05 AM, Adam Morris wrote:
  The guys who I've done the site for, use this browser so it would be
  nice for it to behave.
  This is the flowered list:
  http://www.megustalatelevision.com/uwish/


 -
 Tom Livingston
 Senior Multimedia Artist
 Media Logic
 www.mlinc.com



 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Safari problems

2005-11-07 Thread Jan Brasna

On my version of Safari (1.3)


The 1.3 branch is fairly OK, it implemented all the bugfixes and 
features that are present in 2.x, but the odler one misbehave seriously.


My EUR 0.02 - try to play with

#navigation li {
 background-position: 0.5em;
}

a bit, like: 5px 5px or 20% 20% to see whether it works or not. I'd say 
it'd be enough to use something like 0.5em 0 or similar.


--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**