Re: [WSG] clearfixing

Or how about the much simpler more correct method? http://www.quirksmode.org/css/clearing.html On 7/16/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sam sherlock wrote: intention is to put a minimal size block below a container and have other containers flow below that without a great

Re: [WSG] clearfixing

Rowan Lewis schrieb: Or how about the much simpler more correct method? http://www.quirksmode.org/css/clearing.html the problems the OP had in IE5.5 can get worse when the overflow: hidden of the simple clearing meets the Holly hack in other bugfixes needed in this browser:

Re: [WSG] clearfixing

Well, you could use something like 'zoom : 1;' instead, even though it doesn't validate. Anyhow, if all else fails, I feel that the hack Dwain linked it is far worse than adding a little bit of markup and using 'clear : both;'. On 7/16/05, Ingo Chao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rowan Lewis schrieb:

Re: [WSG] clearfixing

Rowan Lewis wrote: Or how about the much simpler more correct method? http://www.quirksmode.org/css/clearing.html is there something wrong with standards mode? dwain -- Dwain Alford [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.alforddesigngroup.com The artist may use any form which his expression

Re: [WSG] clearfixing

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rowan Lewis wrote: Or how about the much simpler more correct method? http://www.quirksmode.org/css/clearing.html is there something wrong with standards mode? dwain thanks to all you sugestions on this 1 - great help atb Sam

Re: [WSG] clearfixing

sam sherlock wrote: intention is to put a minimal size block below a container and have other containers flow below that without a great deal of space or bumping have you read this? http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html hth, dwain -- Dwain Alford [EMAIL PROTECTED]