Or how about the much simpler more correct method?
http://www.quirksmode.org/css/clearing.html
On 7/16/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sam sherlock wrote:
intention is to put a minimal size block below a container and have
other containers flow below that without a great
Rowan Lewis schrieb:
Or how about the much simpler more correct method?
http://www.quirksmode.org/css/clearing.html
the problems the OP had in IE5.5 can get worse when the overflow: hidden
of the simple clearing meets the Holly hack in other bugfixes needed
in this browser:
Well, you could use something like 'zoom : 1;' instead, even though it
doesn't validate.
Anyhow, if all else fails, I feel that the hack Dwain linked it is far
worse than adding a little bit of markup and using 'clear : both;'.
On 7/16/05, Ingo Chao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rowan Lewis schrieb:
Rowan Lewis wrote:
Or how about the much simpler more correct method?
http://www.quirksmode.org/css/clearing.html
is there something wrong with standards mode?
dwain
--
Dwain Alford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.alforddesigngroup.com
The artist may use any form which his expression
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rowan Lewis wrote:
Or how about the much simpler more correct method?
http://www.quirksmode.org/css/clearing.html
is there something wrong with standards mode?
dwain
thanks to all you sugestions on this 1 - great help
atb Sam
sam sherlock wrote:
intention is to put a minimal size block below a container and have
other containers flow below that without a great deal of space
or bumping
have you read this?
http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html
hth,
dwain
--
Dwain Alford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]