Hi Bill,
>> Except we don't have a program called jt9. Guess you mean wsjt? The
>> full suite (in order of their birth years) is WSJT, MAP65, WSPR, WSJT-X,
>> and WSPR-X.
> We do in terms of Linux packaging. Technically any executable that is
> bundled into a package should have a man page and t
This message is only to see if I have write privilege.
73
John
TI4/N0URE
--
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
applications. Writt
On 19/04/2014 17:20, Richard Shaw wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Bill Somerville
mailto:g4...@classdesign.com>> wrote:
On 19/04/2014 14:12, Richard Shaw wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Bill Somerville
mailto:g4...@classdesign.com>> wrote
On 19/04/2014 17:23, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Joe,
> Hi all,
>
>>> If we need one for each executable, would should probably take inventory
>>> of all aps and maybe make one Manpage or set of pages for all ? as allot
>>> of it overlaps
>> I agree. I thought, a single man page that covered everything an
Hi all,
>> If we need one for each executable, would should probably take inventory
>> of all aps and maybe make one Manpage or set of pages for all ? as allot
>> of it overlaps
> I agree. I thought, a single man page that covered everything and have
> other pages shadow that one, so for example f
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 19/04/2014 14:12, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Bill Somerville
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> as most Linux distros are starting to include Qt 5 in their stable
>> official repos and because we a
On 19/04/2014 16:59, KI7MT wrote:
Hi Greg,
> On 04/19/2014 04:56 AM, Bill Somerville wrote:
>> One of the requirements for a Linux package is a man page for each
>> executable distributed. This can be reduced to a single man page that is
>> shared by each program (for example wsjtx and jt9 could b
On 04/19/2014 04:56 AM, Bill Somerville wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> as most Linux distros are starting to include Qt 5 in their stable
> official repos and because we are statically linking the Hamlib we are
> using at present it is possible for us to generate packages that could
> be submitted to those
On 19/04/2014 14:12, Richard Shaw wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Bill Somerville
mailto:g4...@classdesign.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
as most Linux distros are starting to include Qt 5 in their stable
official repos and because we are statically linking the Hamlib we
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Bill Somerville wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> as most Linux distros are starting to include Qt 5 in their stable
> official repos and because we are statically linking the Hamlib we are
> using at present it is possible for us to generate packages that could
> be submitted
Hi All,
as most Linux distros are starting to include Qt 5 in their stable
official repos and because we are statically linking the Hamlib we are
using at present it is possible for us to generate packages that could
be submitted to those repositories without falling foul of their strict
entry
11 matches
Mail list logo
