Hi all,
Does anyone have last-minute must do commits for the WSJT-X code?
Are we converging toward tagging revision 4363 as release candidate 1
for version 1.4.0 ?
-- Joe, K1JT
--
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance
On 25/09/2014 15:13, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Joe,
Does anyone have last-minute must do commits for the WSJT-X code?
Are we converging toward tagging revision 4363 as release candidate 1
for version 1.4.0 ?
I am still working through the consequences of adding in the local user
guide.
On 25/09/2014 15:39, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Joe,
RR Bill, thanks for the update.
OK, I think I'm done.
The Linux package building is still short of making compliant packages
but at least some sort of package (DEB and RPM) can be generated which
will at least install and run from in system
On 25/09/2014 17:50, KI7MT wrote:
Hi Bill,
Hi Greg,
On 9/25/2014 16:28, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 25/09/2014 15:39, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Joe,
RR Bill, thanks for the update.
OK, I think I'm done.
The Linux package building is still short of making compliant packages
but at least some
Hi all,
OK, I think I'm done.
Full marks, indeed -- to all who have contributed so much! Bill, would
you like to create a tag of .../branches/wsjtx at r4370? Packages for
WSJT-X-1.4.0-rc1 would then be built from that revision, for all
supported platforms.
-- Joe
On 25/09/2014 18:14, KI7MT wrote:
HI Bill,
Hi Greg,
On 9/25/2014 17:07, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 25/09/2014 17:50, KI7MT wrote:
Hi Bill,
Hi Greg,
On 9/25/2014 16:28, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 25/09/2014 15:39, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Joe,
RR Bill, thanks for the update.
OK, I think I'm
Hi Bill,
On 9/25/2014 17:20, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 25/09/2014 18:14, KI7MT wrote:
HI Bill,
Hi Greg,
On 9/25/2014 17:07, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 25/09/2014 17:50, KI7MT wrote:
Hi Bill,
Hi Greg,
On 9/25/2014 16:28, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 25/09/2014 15:39, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi
Hi All,
the first cut of v1.4.0 has been made. The tag tags/wsjtx-1.4.0-rc1 has
been recorded.
Anyone making a distribution kit for the upcoming Beta release of v1.4.0
must checkout this tag and ensure you have a clean source tree before
building it. Do not commit any changes to the tag as it
Mike --
Credits mismatch between About window and the manual
Thanks for catching this discrepancy. The online manual has been fixed;
we'll need to correct the list in About in rc2.
-- Joe, K1JT
--
Meet PCI
Hi Joe and all.i have just done an update of WSJT-X using a script i
put together from the origional lines for cmake sent out by Bill
im now showing WSJT-X v1.5.0-c1 r4375
looks goodwill check it all out and report any problems
Bill...im still using your origonal hamlib 3 files you sent
Hi Billyep im on Linux...ok will try and follow your instructions
for the update of Hamlib3
Just worked Pierre F5LMI with about 30 watts so the new update of WSJT-X
is working well
73 David VK4BDJ
On 26/09/14 06:25, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 25/09/2014 21:02, David wrote:
Hi David,
On 25/09/2014 21:57, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Bill,
Hi Joe,
Thanks for posting a clear statement of correct repository procedures
going forward.
All seems OK to me, except possibly for your parenthetical statement
one day we really need to move this to trunk.
We can't do this unless we give up
Hi Joe, Bill,
I just want to make sure I understand all this now. If we use the
standard branch head for WSJTX, that is now being called wsjtx v1.5?
And to pull WSJTX-1.4.0-RC1, we use:
svn co https://svn.code.sf.net/p/wsjt/wsjt/tags/wsjtx-1.4.0-rc1
or
svn co
On 26/09/2014 00:03, KI7MT wrote:
Hi Joe, Bill,
Hi Greg,
I just want to make sure I understand all this now. If we use the
standard branch head for WSJTX, that is now being called wsjtx v1.5?
Yes, actually wsjtx-1.5.0-rc1.
And to pull WSJTX-1.4.0-RC1, we use:
svn co
Hi Bill,
Joe:
All seems OK to me, except possibly for your parenthetical statement
one day we really need to move this to trunk.
We can't do this unless we give up the notion that WSJT, MAP65, WSPR,
WSPR-X, and WSJT-X are all part of the same project. Historically,
the trunk: of the project
Hi All,
branching and merging in source control is often a source of confusion
and seems daunting at first so here is an example that covers the
Release branch situation we are currently in.
Greg (KI7MT) has checked out the WSJT-X v1.4 branch branches/wsjtx-1.4
and made a change that needs to
On 26/09/2014 01:57, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Bill,
Hi Joe,
Greg (KI7MT) has checked out the WSJT-X v1.4 branch branches/wsjtx-1.4
and made a change that needs to go into the next release candidate
wsjtx-1.4.0-rc2. At the time of writing he has committed the change to
the branch but not yet
:-) I glad that's sorted out, as I don't think I've ever made any
commits to WSJT-X branches .. If I did, it was minor, and a long time ago.
You had me thinking something was seriously amiss :-)
73's
Greg, KI7MT
On 9/26/2014 01:00, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 26/09/2014 01:57, Joe Taylor wrote:
:-) I glad that's sorted out, as I don't think I've ever made any
commits to WSJT-X branches .. If I did, it was minor, and a long time ago.
You had me thinking something was seriously amiss :-)
73's
Greg, KI7MT
On 9/26/2014 01:00, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 26/09/2014 01:57, Joe Taylor wrote:
19 matches
Mail list logo
