Hi Igor, Sandro and all,
I’m at a loss as to why or how the same revision would give such different
decoding results on different machines. So far, I am not able to reproduce that
here.
In r6058 I’ve committed another change that is designed to reduce the number of
false syncs. I implemented
Hi Steven and All other,
I testing the version 6056 compared to 6052 under windows.
(JTSDK-QT 5.5 ) C:\tmp)timerx "jt65-r6056 -n 1
c:\\test\\151019_*.wav > deco6056.txt"
Command = "jt65-r6056 -n 1 c:\\test\\151019_*.wav > deco6056.txt"
Command took 94.130 seconds to run.
(JTSDK-QT 5.5
Hi Mike, Steve,
I have done the tests with r6056. Both both computers now run r6056 with the
same settings: Random erasure patterns = 6, two-pass decoding, Agressive
decoding level = 5.
Slow WinXP computer has Intel Core 2 Duo CPU T7500 2.2GHz/2.19GHz processor.
Fast Windows 7 computer has AMD
