Re: [wsjt-devel] Gravitational Waves

2016-02-15 Thread Dave AA6YQ
>>>AA6YQ comments below -Original Message- From: Chase Turner [mailto:ke4...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 10:31 PM To: WSJT software development Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Gravitational Waves You are a little late to this party, as usual. A lot of the discussion about this

Re: [wsjt-devel] Gravitational Waves

2016-02-15 Thread Chase Turner
Joe, You are a little late to this party, as usual. A lot of the discussion about this phenomena, which doesn't have anything to do with WSJT (other than your ego that this is in fact your mailing list) has been happening all over so many mailing lists that your response is cluttering, off topic a

Re: [wsjt-devel] Watchdog

2016-02-15 Thread George J Molnar
W9MDB makes a good suggestion. Perhaps it is time to revamp the watchdog even more, with different HF and VHF settings based not on attempts, but on time? With the inclusion of the "fast" modes and the differing needs for MS/EME over HF, it seems more flexibility is needed. A five minute watch

Re: [wsjt-devel] Watchdog

2016-02-15 Thread Guy G4DWV/4X1LT
Michael Black writes: > File/Settings General tab/Behavior Runaway Tx watchdog. > If enabled and you start a transmission and leave it running it will stop after 7 attempts right now.  Without it enabled the transmission will run forever until you manually stop it. > There was an earlier request

[wsjt-devel] Gravitational Waves

2016-02-15 Thread Joe Taylor
Hi all, After spending a most enjoyable week on the sunny Caribbean island of St. Lucia, I'm home again. Returning was quite a shock -- the temperature here on arrival was 6 F. Probably you heard last Thursday's announcement about the detection of gravitational waves originating from a pair o

Re: [wsjt-devel] Watchdog

2016-02-15 Thread Chris Sullivan
If you decide to implement the video solution I’d like to be able to control the program with hand signals and facial expressions :) If there were greater control over the runaway Tx watchdog I’d set it to 1 for responding to CQ & 73, 6+ for CQ, and 3 for everything else. That would be my i