Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass

The worse part  is when you think they actually call you. HI I got fooled on one instance, the call sign was  correct so I tried replying. The locator seems right too but it's 160 and I am on a city lot so not likely.  I'll try enabling WAV recording in the future. 73 Relu NJ9R Original

Re: [wsjt-devel] Min Window Size

Didn't mean to post that link to the listsorry guys. de Mike W9MDB On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Black Michael wrote: > You want to test it? > > This one has a few patches I'm waiting to hear on. > > #1 Min window size -- use CTRL-M to toggle the menu and several

Re: [wsjt-devel] Min Window Size

You want to test it? This one has a few patches I'm waiting to hear on. #1 Min window size -- use CTRL-M to toggle the menu and several other items (it's on the View menu).  Only the Menu gets turned back on when toggled until you restart the program.  It doesn't remember the setting or window

Re: [wsjt-devel] Min Window Size

Hello Mike, Great Idea. As I have a FLEX-6700 and 8 instances of WSJT-X running, I would be very pleased to save space on my screen. Please Joe/Bill... 73, Cedric HB9HFN I've been playing around with making WSJT-X smaller. At this point I have attached CTRL-M to toggling a few items like

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass

Hi Jim, On 12/15/2016 1:36 PM, Jim Brown wrote: > Thanks. Do you WANT these files? If so, I'll send them. Otherwise I > won't bother. No need to send files. -- Joe -- Check out the vibrant tech community on

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass

Thanks. Do you WANT these files? If so, I'll send them. Otherwise I won't bother. 73, Jim On Thu,12/15/2016 10:22 AM, Joe Taylor wrote: > Hi Jim, > > On 12/15/2016 12:18 PM, Jim Brown wrote: > >> If you can tell me where to find the .wav, I can send it, but I'm not >> sure if you would want

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass

Hi Jim, On 12/15/2016 12:18 PM, Jim Brown wrote: > If you can tell me where to find the .wav, I can send it, but I'm not > sure if you would want it. I can't even find the file corresponding to > the left display of decodes. :) If you have checked *Save all* or *Save decoded*, .wav files are

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass

Hi Joe, My post is not a complaint, simply a beta report on the software. The number of false decodes I'm seeing is much fewer than 1%, and their printed content corresponds to your description. I agree that's quite acceptable if it also provides additional good decodes. It might, however, be

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass

Hi Jim, Without specifics and saved .wav files it's impossible to comment in any detail on your false decodes. When developing the two-pass decoder, we analyzed over a thousand .wav files in crowded band conditions. The probability of false decodes was higher for second-pass decodes than for

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass

Hello Jim- I have been running my receiver overnight on 160M for a few years now. I use to see the kind of decodes you mention but they went away for a while. Recently thought they have returned but infrequently. I notice them because they are in impossible propagation zones for the time. IE

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes

Hi all, a lot of 'ghost' signals on 20m JT9 - wonder where they came from. 1004 -14 0.8 515 @ F6AVP G3PXT -22 1004 -17 0.0 888 @ CQ DL2BQV JO73 ~Germany 20m 1006 -5 0.9 515 @ F6AVP G3PXT -22 1006 -21 0.0 888 @ CQ DL2BQV JO73 ~Germany

Re: [wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass

I also have been using WSJT-X RC3 overnight monitoring 630 m WSPR with no problems detected. No phantoms so far. 73, John de VK2XGJ I hear there's a new restaurant on the Moon, great view but no atmosphere! -Original Message- From: Jim Brown Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 7:04

[wsjt-devel] Bad Decodes On Second Pass

Hi Team, For several weeks, I've been letting WSJT-X rc3 run overnight on 160M while I sleep, and tabulating the decodes the next day. I've been quite pleasantly surprised by the activity -- in less than a month, I've decoded about 450 different stations running JT65 or JT9. More than a dozen