I have experienced several crashes on our Windows 7 PC after installing RC5
(64bit). Usually it happens in connection with resizing windows, but sometimes
it is totally unprovoked. I have tried to search the list archive for this, but
find nothing. Is this only us at OH2K, or have others reporte
Ray Rocker kirjoitti 9.5.2019 klo 6.44:
Oh, he didn't get my RR73, let's double click him to keep going...
--> W1ABC WQ5L 559 MS
Argh! Double-click restarts the QSO and I wind up logging it again, if
he plays along. What I want is to just re-send the RR73 when I
Hi!
I was not on FT4 contest (
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 10:21 PM Gary - K7EK via wsjt-devel
wrote:
> On multiple occasions the other station failed to receive my RR73 and kept
> sending his exchange over and over. Unfortunately there was no timely method
> to requeue an exchange with RR73. This lost more contacts and appeared t
In my case, I answered many CQ's of very strong stations, only to have no more
decodes from them. The result was dozens of incomplete contacts. Also, logging
appeared to work only some of the time, resulting in more lost contacts.
Logging complained about invalid information. The only thing I co
Pretty slick. Auto logging worked as expected. Made 22 qsos. When cqing
(with hold tx freq and call 1st activated), I missed replying to several
callers because of the following. After "auto logging" took place, "call
1st" became deactivated and in the confusion, I missed callers. I then
reacti
For me it was pretty much a less than expected experience. I started out
on the suggested frequency and when it got so crowded and I had very little
success, I moved up 2 as suggested. Clearer but no better. I believe I
followed the instructions to the letter and was expecting much better
result
Only managed 6 Q’s in ~30min. Not the best propagation time in my area - well
before dusk. Still, lots of traffic though.
I do not remember the RU settings using a serial number, only State/Province or
DX. That part of WSJT-X worked fine here. Also saw many DT’s that were more
than 0.5s off my
Did a few. Seemed to work but not as much activity as I was expecting to
see. Some of the QSO logging didn't have all fields filled out
automatically but allowed me to type in. Some QSOs logged fine
automatically. I may also be suffering some audio issues mentioned with
Win10. It's working but
Hi Richard:
Keep present clock diff have to be < .5. FT4 is more strict regarding time.
73'
Edfel
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 9:02 PM Richard Lamont wrote:
> On 06/05/2019 15:45, Joe Taylor wrote:
>
> > One-hour "practice contest" sessions will be held this week and next
> > week using the FT4 mo
Same problem here. I filled in some blanks and managed to save some of
those.
FUN
MUCH FUN
LOTSA FUN
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 9:02 PM Richard Lamont wrote:
> On 06/05/2019 15:45, Joe Taylor wrote:
>
> > One-hour "practice contest" sessions will be held this week and next
> > week using the FT4 m
On 06/05/2019 15:45, Joe Taylor wrote:
> One-hour "practice contest" sessions will be held this week and next
> week using the FT4 mode and the ARRL RTTY Roundup rules.
>
> Thursday, May 9, -0100 UTC (Wednesday evening, May 8, NA time)
Using Ubuntu MATE 18.04.
Well I tried but didn't get ve
Whatever you want. Nothing special about this mode.
de Mike W9MDB
On Wednesday, May 8, 2019, 5:15:25 PM CDT, Steve Schowiak
wrote:
What power output is recommended?
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 1:37 PM Joe Taylor wrote:
Reminder to all:
FT4 Practice Contest session this evening (NA t
On 09/05/2019 00:37, Al Reeves wrote:
I have about 55,000 .wav files stored in my WSJTX/Save folder. Can
these be deleted without affecting WSJT-X operation?
TNX Al
W1JHU
HI Al,
yes. "Menu->File->Delete all *.wav & *.c2 files in SaveDir".
You might also check that you have not selected "M
I have about 55,000 .wav files stored in my WSJTX/Save folder. Can
these be deleted without affecting WSJT-X operation?
TNX Al
W1JHU
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
What power output is recommended?
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 1:37 PM Joe Taylor wrote:
> Reminder to all:
>
> FT4 Practice Contest session this evening (NA time), May 9 to 0100
> UTC.
>
> Details and instructions can be found here:
>
> http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/FT4_Practice_Conte
Is there a working Mac release (or workaround) that I missed?
On Wed, 8 May 2019, Joe Taylor wrote:
Reminder to all:
FT4 Practice Contest session this evening (NA time), May 9 to 0100 UTC.
Details and instructions can be found here:
http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/FT4_Practice_
From the linked instructions:
"Our apologies to macOS users; the next candidate release will support
macOS as well as Windows and Linux."
On 5/8/2019 1:43 PM, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
Is there a working Mac release (or workaround) that I missed?
On Wed, 8 May 2019, Joe Taylor wrote:
Reminde
Reminder to all:
FT4 Practice Contest session this evening (NA time), May 9 to 0100
UTC.
Details and instructions can be found here:
http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/FT4_Practice_Contest.txt
-- 73, Joe, K1JT (for the WSJT Development Group)
On 08/05/2019 09:18, Игорь Ч via wsjt-devel wrote:
We should also take in account overlapping spectra as spreading
information between symbols under GFSK will affect decoding of the
overlapped signals mostly if we are using frequency criterion for
candidate ranking and probably due to the inacc
Hi Bill,
.
We should also take in account overlapping spectra as spreading information
between symbols under GFSK will affect decoding of the overlapped signals
mostly if we are using frequency criterion for candidate ranking and probably
due to the inaccurate signal subtraction, assuming all si
20 matches
Mail list logo
