>After installing WSJT-X ver 2.3.0 I have a cursor frequency readout box
displayed every time my mouse cursor is over the Widegraph window even when
no WSJT-X window has focus. How can I disable this?
Andy,
I have found it to be a useful feature, when I have multiple windows
partially over
> On Feb 16, 2021, at 12:00, Adrian wrote:
>
> The problem I am having with v2.3.0 is the auto log popup sometimes not
> working on the RR73 or 73, and a need to rework the station to get the
> logging popup. The effect is random and not often.
I started to notice mine doing the same, three
Hi Reino,
I completely understand – which is why I wonder why people expect WSJT-X to
work for WFD, when it obviously cannot unless the protocol is, in fact, changed.
Larry / W1DYJ
From: Reino Talarmo
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2021 15:56
To: 'WSJT software development'
Subject: Re:
I don't believe a 'macro' is used for this.
Neil, KN3ILZ
On 2/19/2021 2:39 PM, Jim Record wrote:
Have you considered adding a downloadable macro capability to let a
user program the capability for other contests. Maybe in Python?
Jim
AD0YO
--
Jim Record
/Firgenholt Joyner/
(Old English (sort
You can't ...
Neil, KN3ILZ
On 2/19/2021 4:30 PM, Andy Durbin wrote:
After installing WSJT-X ver 2.3.0 I have a cursor frequency readout
box displayed every time my mouse cursor is over the Widegraph window
even when no WSJT-X window has focus. How can I disable this?
73,
Andy, k3wyc
On 2/19/21 at 3:14 PM, wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net (Larry
B. via wsjt-devel) wrote:
I could be wrong, but I thought Joe’s analysis showed that
the Winter FD exchange would not fit into the 77 bit package
that FT8/4 used. Perhaps if WFD changed its exchange to fit
the already available
Hello WSJTX devs,
First, thanks for all the wonderful work you do on WSJT-X.
I run 3 instances of WSJT-X v2.4.0-rc1 on a dedicated Linux Mint 20.1
computer using an IC-7600 (HF), IC-7300 (6M) and IC-9700 (VHF through
microwave) all connected via USB.
For the serial CAT control, I use the
After installing WSJT-X ver 2.3.0 I have a cursor frequency readout box
displayed every time my mouse cursor is over the Widegraph window even when no
WSJT-X window has focus. How can I disable this?
73,
Andy, k3wyc
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
Hi Jim,
I don't know if this exactly what you are looking for, by I wrote a program
(Windows Only) for theblind hams that uses a working default configuration as a
basis for all the other contest modes. It allows them to select which contents
they wish to participates in and what are the
Hi Larry,
It is really a question of principle. Protocol must be capable of sending long
free text that is not allowed to be source coded. Perhaps Q-codes are still
allowed, hi! FT8 13 character free text is about ok for sending the required
exchange, but…
Extract of reasoning:
Also, its
Have you considered adding a downloadable macro capability to let a user
program the capability for other contests. Maybe in Python?
Jim
AD0YO
--
Jim Record
*Firgenholt Joyner*
(Old English (sort of) for Mountain Wood Joiner)
___
wsjt-devel mailing
I could be wrong, but I thought Joe’s analysis showed that the Winter FD
exchange would not fit into the 77 bit package that FT8/4 used. Perhaps if WFD
changed its exchange to fit the already available rules, it would work well.
73 -- Larry -- W1DYJ
From: Dave Slotter, W3DJS
Sent: Friday,
Program version: V2.4.0-rc1Operating System: Windows 10 PROProblem: popup error concerning “STACK ERROR” and “orphaned JT9 process” plus “fatal error”Sequence: this has occurred 3 times after the transmit cycle has completed and switching back to receive. The only fix is to reboot. It seems to run
Considering the 'sponsor' of "Winter" Field Day had this to say below,
I'm not sure its worth it to add this 'contest'. Not to mention that
the sponsor doesn't use the same types of codes that the ARRL Field Day
uses. The codes in WFD would not properly fit in a 77 bit package, so
its not an
Hi Dave,
Thanks for your continued interest.
Yes, WFD has significant participation -- a bit less than 1/10 of that
in the other non-contest that has a formatted exchange built into the
WSJT-X 77-bit structured messages.
I'm sorry if I misled you into thinking this was simply a matter of
Hi Dave,
the EU VHF Contest Mode is already used in several contests, not
specifically data mode ones. Several EU VHF contests are not mode
specific and allow entrants to boost their scores in quiet periods using
terrestrial digital modes over any path not assisted by third-party
repesters
Joe:
I took your message as a challenge to look up where the activity is
definitively. From the notes below which I just compiled, it seems that
there is a "low" of *151* logs received by the 2020 FT8 VHF-UHF EU contest
up to a high of *2,349* logs received by the ARRL 2021 RTTY Roundup. By
Hi Reino,
Thanks for the information -- I'm delighted to hear it!
We have received very little feedback about use of EU VHF Contest mode,
so we are somewhat in the dark.
-- Joe, k1JT
On 2/19/2021 11:24 AM, Reino Talarmo wrote:
As it turns out, supporting EU VHF contests has not
>As it turns out, supporting EU VHF contests has not been very fruitful.
I believe it's not much used.
Hi Joe,
I am a happy EU VHF contest user at least once a month, but I am interested
only 6m band contests and there are many more e.g. in the Nordic Activity
Contest NAC. It is used in
Hi Dave,
The simple answer is that when designing our 77-bit message payload we
chose to implement support for a few contests particularly relevant to
the WSJT-X modes.
WSJT and its sister programs were motivated for VHF/UHF weak-signal work
and have had a strong VHF+ influence from the
Bill:
I decided to review the mailing list for prior discussions of Winter Field
Day (WFD) before writing this message.
I was wondering why WFD was not supported by WSJT-X and it appears from a
message you apparently wrote on November 20, 2018 that:
the field day class is packed into 3 bits so
It doesn't work that way, Follow the URL at the bottom of the message to
unsubscribe
Hasan
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 5:39 PM Adam Gilmore wrote:
>
>
>
> ___
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>
I have the same issue with my TS-590SG driving my TRV... but I'm not a
MAP65 user.
Hamlib errors when using the virtual shared COM port.
In previous versions all was OK. Other HAM software workes flawless on
that setup.
best 73!
Andy SO3Z
pt., 19 lut 2021 o 04:27 Alex Artieda, HB9DRI
23 matches
Mail list logo
